How Must a Polygon Be According to Hard of Hearing Students? An Investigation with a Semiotic Approach
https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.6097
Downloads
Abstract
Downloads
References
Ansell, E., & Pagliaro, C. M. (2006). The relative difficulty of signed arithmetic story problems for primary level deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enj030
Google Scholar CrossrefArgün, Z., Arıkan, A., Bulut S., & Halıcıoğlu, S. (2014). Temel matematik kavramların künyesi [The tag of basic mathematical concepts], Pegema Akademia.
Google Scholar CrossrefArzarello, F. (2006). Semiosis as a multimodal process. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, 9(1 extraordinario), 267–299.
Google Scholar CrossrefArzarello, F., Paola, D. Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2009). Gestures as semiotic resources in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9163-z
Google Scholar CrossrefArzarello F., & Robutti, O. (2008). Framing the embodied mind approach within a multimodal paradigm. L. English et al (Eds.), Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 720-749). Taylor & Francis.
Google Scholar CrossrefBattista, M. T. (1990). Spatial visualization and gender differences in high school geometry. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.21.1.0047
Google Scholar CrossrefBavelier, D., Dye, M. W., & Hauser, P. C. (2006). Do deaf individuals see better?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(11), 512–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.006
Google Scholar CrossrefCook, S. W., & Goldin-Meadow S. (2006). The role of gesture in learning: Do children use their hands to change their minds? Journal of Cognition & Development, 7(2), 211–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327647jcd0702_4
Google Scholar CrossrefDe Villiers, M. (1998). To teach definitions in geometry or teach to define? In A. Oliver & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (vol. 2, pp. 248-255). IGPME.
Google Scholar CrossrefEdwards, L. D. (2009). Gestures and conceptual integration in mathematical talk. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 127-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9124-6
Google Scholar CrossrefFujita, T., & Jones, K. (2006). Primary trainee teachers’ understanding of basic geometrical figures in Scotland. Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 3, pp. 14-21). IGPME.
Google Scholar CrossrefGoldin, G. (1998). Representational systems, learning, and problem solving in mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 137-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80056-1
Google Scholar CrossrefGoldin-Meadow, S., & Singer, M.A. (2003). From children’s hands to adults’ ears: Gesture’s role in teaching and learning. Developmental Psychology, 39(3), 509-520. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.3.509
Google Scholar CrossrefGürefe, N. (2015). İşitme engelli öğrencilerin bazı geometrik kavramları tanımlamalarında semiyotik kaynakların kullanımı [The use of semiotic resources on description process some geometric concepts of deaf students]. Doctoral dissertation, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkey. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
Google Scholar CrossrefHall, M. & Bavelier D. (2010). Working memory, deafness and sign language . In Marschark M. & Spencer P. E. (Eds.), The Handbook of Deaf Studies, Language and Education (pp. 458-472). Oxford Library of Psychology.
Google Scholar CrossrefKelly, R. R., & Gaustad, M. G. (2007). Deaf college students’ mathematical skills relative to morphological knowledge, reading level, and language proficiency. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enl012
Google Scholar CrossrefKendon, A. (1988). Sign languaages of Aboriginal Australia: Culturel, semiotic, and communicative perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefKritzer, K. L. (2012). Building foundations for numeracy: A qualitative analysis of the basic concept knowledge demonstrated by young deaf children. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 37(2), 106-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911203700214
Google Scholar CrossrefLee, C. (2010). Middle school deaf students’ problem-solving behaviors and strategy use. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Ohio State University.
Google Scholar CrossrefMcNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago.
Google Scholar CrossrefMcNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and Thought. University of Chicago.
Google Scholar CrossrefMousley, K., & Kurz, C. (2015). Pre-college deaf students’ understanding of fractional concepts: What we know and what we do not know. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities, 18(1), 38-60. https://doi.org/10.14448/jsesd.07.0004
Google Scholar CrossrefNemirovsky, R., & Tierney, C. (2001). Children creating ways to represent changing situations: on the development of homogenous spaces. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 45(1-3), 67-102. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013806228763
Google Scholar CrossrefNunes, T., & Moreno, C. (2002). An intervention program for promoting deaf pupils’ achievement in mathematics. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7(2), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/7.2.120
Google Scholar CrossrefPagliaro, C. M. (2015). Developing numeracy in individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing. H. Knoors & M. Marschark (Eds.), Educating deaf learners: Creating a global evidence base içinde (pp. 173–195). Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefPagliaro, C.M. & Kritzer, K.L. (2013). The math gap: A description of the mathematics performance of preschool-aged deaf/hard-of-hearing children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 18(2), 139-160. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/ens070
Google Scholar CrossrefParrill, F., & Sweetser, E. (2004). What we mean by meaning. Gesture, 4(2), 197-219. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.4.2.05par
Google Scholar CrossrefPresmeg, N. (2006). Semiotics and the “connections” standard: Significance of semiotics for teachers of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1-2), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-3365-z
Google Scholar CrossrefSteward, D. & Kluwin, T.N. (2001). Teaching deaf and hard of hearing students: Content, strategies and curriculum. Allyn & Bacon.
Google Scholar CrossrefStewart, R., N. Leeson, and R. J. Wright. (1997). Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. In F. Biddulph and K. Carr (Eds.), Links between Early Arithmetical Knowledge and Early Space and Measure Knowledge: An Exploratory Study (pp. 477–84). MERGA.
Google Scholar CrossrefTall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305619
Google Scholar CrossrefTurkish Sign Language Dictionary (TSL). (2014, 10 August). Retrieved from http://tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=264.
Google Scholar CrossrefTürnüklü, E. & Ergin, S. (2016). 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin cisimleri görsel tanıma ve tanımlamaları: cisim imgeleri [8th year students’ definitions and figural recognitions of solids: Concept images]. İlköğretim Online, 15(1), 40-52.
Google Scholar CrossrefTürnüklü, E., Gündoğdu-Alaylı, F. & Akkaş, E. N. (2013). Investigation of prospective primary mathematics teachers’ perceptions and images for quadrilaterals. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(2), 1225-1232.
Google Scholar CrossrefVan De Walle, J. A. (2004). Elemantary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (5. Press). Pearson Education.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Nejla Gürefe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication but allow anyone to share: (unload, , reprint, distribute and/or copy) and adapt (remix, transform reuse, modify,) for any proposition, even commercial, always quoting the original source.