Women Leaders as Containers: Systems Psychodynamic Insights into their Unconscious Roles
https://doi.org/10.17583/generos.2018.3217
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to explore the self-defined roles of women leaders working in higher education institutions (HEIs) in South Africa. The aim is to explore women leadership roles in the context of systems psychodynamics to increase the understanding of unconscious dynamics in HEIs from the perspective of women leaders. The article reports on a qualitative study based on the research paradigm of Dilthey's modern hermeneutics. Interviews were conducted with 23 women leaders from the HERS-SA (Higher Education Research Services) network across eight institutions. Observations were made in one organization to support the data analysis and interpretation. Data was analysed through content analysis. Women leaders are containers of anxieties in South African HEIs, while they also act out defense mechanisms, such as splitting, projection, projective identification, introjection, idealization, simplification and rationalization. Splitting seems to be one important defense mechanism in terms of mother/professional, mother/daughter, women/men leaders and White/Black women leaders. Women leaders further seem to have introjected the roles of their mothers and female family members from their past and childhood. They do not seem to embrace the full authority and agency of their leadership positions, and they explore their own difficulties and negative emotions in others through projective identification. The findings create awareness of the roles of women leaders, strengthen women leadership and emphasise the need for leadership training taking the systems psychodynamic perspective into account.
Downloads
References
Adisa, T.A., Gbadamosi, G. and Osabutey, E.L.C. (2016). Work-family balance: a case analysis of coping strategies adopted by Nigerian and British working mothers, Gender in Management: An International Journal 31(7), 414-433.
Google Scholar CrossrefAlden, C. and Schoeman, M. (2013). South Africa in the company of giants: the search for leadership in a transforming global order. International Affairs,
Google Scholar CrossrefAram, E., Baxter, R., and Nutkevitch, A. (Eds.). (2015). Group Relations Work: Exploring the Impact and Relevance Within and Beyond Its Network. Karnac Books.
Google Scholar CrossrefArmstrong, D. (2005). Organisation in the mind: Psychoanalysis, group relations and organisational consultancy. London: Karnac Books.
Google Scholar CrossrefArmstrong, D., and Rustin, M. (2014). Introduction: Revisiting the paradigm.
Google Scholar CrossrefBayly, S. (2015). We can't go on meeting like this: Notes on affect and post-democratic organization. Performance Research 20(4), 39-48.
Google Scholar CrossrefBeck, U.C. and Visholm, S. (2014). Authority Relations in Group Relations Conferences and in “Real Life” Group Relations Conferences, Danish Design I 14(2), 227–237.
Google Scholar CrossrefBezuidenhout, A. and Cilliers, F.V.N. (2010). Burnout, work engagement and sense of coherence in female academics in higher-education institutions in South Africa, SA Journal of Industrial Psychology 36(1) 1–10. http://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v36i1.872.
Google Scholar CrossrefBion, W.R. (1961), Experiences in groups, London, Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefBlackman, J.S. (2004). 101 Defences. How the mind shields itself. New York: Brunner-Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefBrunner, L.D., Nutkevitch, A., and Sher, M. (2006). Group relations conferences. Reviewing and exploring theory, design, role–taking and application. London: Karnac.
Google Scholar CrossrefCharmaz, K. (2011). A constructivist grounded theory analysis, In F. J. Wertz, K. Charmaz, L. M. McMullen, R. Josselson, R. Anderson, and E. McSpadden (Eds), Five ways of doing qualitative analysis, pp. 165–204, New York, The Guilford Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefCilliers, F. and Koortzen, P. (2005). Working with conflict in teams - the CIBART model, HR Future October, 51-52.
Google Scholar CrossrefCilliers, F., and May, M. (2010). The popularisation of Positive Psychology as a defence against
Google Scholar Crossrefbehavioural complexity in research and organisations. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology/SA. Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde, 36(2), Art. #917, 10 pages. DOI: 10.4102/sajip.v36i2.917.
Google Scholar CrossrefCilliers, F., and Terblanche, L. (2010). The systems psychodynamic leadership coaching experiences of nursing managers. Health SA Gesondheid 15(1), Art #457, 9 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v15i1.457
Google Scholar CrossrefCilliers, F. and Werner, A. (2013). Group behaviour and other social processes in organisations, In Ziel Bergh and Dirk Geldenhuys (Ed.) Psychology in the work context, 239-269, Oxford, Cape Town.
Google Scholar CrossrefCilliers, F., Greyvenstein, H., and Africa, S. (2012). The impact of silo mentality on team identity: An organisational case study, SA Journal of Industrial Psychology 1-9. doi:10.4102/sajip.v38i2.993.
Google Scholar CrossrefCope, C. M. (2003). Occupational stress, strain and coping in a professional accounting organisation. Pretoria: University of South Africa.
Google Scholar CrossrefCreswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.), Sage Publications, London.
Google Scholar CrossrefCytrynbaum, S., and Noumair, A. (2004). Group dynamics, organisational irrationality and social complexity: Group relations reader 3. Jupiter: A.K. Rice.
Google Scholar CrossrefDavey, K.M. (2008). Women’s accounts of organisational politics as a gendering process, Gender, Work and Organisation 15(6), 650–671.
Google Scholar CrossrefDezso, C.L., Ross, D.G. and Uribe, J.N. (2013). Why are there so few women top managers? A large-sample empirical study of the antecedents of female participation in top management, Social Science Research Network 11(1), doi:org/10.2139/ssrn.2200579.
Google Scholar CrossrefDilthey, W. (2002, [1910]). The formation of the historical world in the human sciences. In Wilhelm Dilthey selected works, Volume III, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefEagly, A.H. and Carli, L.L. (2007). Women and the labyrinth of leadership. Harvard Business review, 85(9)62, 1-9.
Google Scholar CrossrefEckersley, R. M. (2016). Is the West really the best? Modernisation and psychosocial dynamics of human progress and development. Oxford Development Studies 44(3), 349-365.
Google Scholar CrossrefEmployment Equity Act, No 55 (1998). Pretoria: Government Printer.
Google Scholar CrossrefFraher, A. L. (2004). Systems psychodynamics: the formative years of an interdisciplinary field at the Tavistock Institute. History of Psychology 7(1), 65–84. http://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.7.1.65
Google Scholar CrossrefFromm, E. (1955). The sane society. New Work: Fawcett Premier Books.
Google Scholar CrossrefGemmill, G. and Oakley, J. (1992). Leadership: an alientating social myth? Human relations 45(2), 113-129.
Google Scholar CrossrefGreyvenstein, H., and Cilliers, F. (2012). Followership’s experiences of organisational leadership: A systems psychodynamic perspective. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology/SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde, 38(2), Art. #1001, 10 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v38i2.100.
Google Scholar CrossrefHawarden, R. (2013). Glass networks: How networks shape the careers of women directors on corporate boards, In S. Vinnicombe, R.J. Burke,S. Blake-Beard, and L.L. Moore, (Eds.), Handbook of research on promoting women’s careers, pp. 212-234, Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Google Scholar CrossrefKaplan, O. and Lipinsky-Kella, K. (2015). Virtual teams and group relations in the WEB 2.0 era: insights from an MBA experiential distance learning course, In Aran E., Baxter, R and Nutkevitch, A, (Ed.), Group Relations Work Exploring the impact and relevance within and beyond its network Volume IV, Karnac, London.
Google Scholar CrossrefKelly, J.R. and Barsade, S. (2001). Emotions in small groups and work teams. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 86, 99-130.
Google Scholar CrossrefKets De Vries, M.F.R. (2007). Coach and couch. London: Palgrave.
Google Scholar CrossrefKinnear, L. (2014). A critical analysis of the emerging models of power amongst South African women business leaders, Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Google Scholar CrossrefKlein, M. (1988). Envy and gratitude and other works 1946–1963. London: Hogarth.
Google Scholar CrossrefKlein, M. (1997). Envy and gratitude and other works 1946-1963. London: Vintage.
Google Scholar CrossrefKlein, L. (2005). Working across the gap. The practice of social science in organisations. London: Karnac
Google Scholar CrossrefLong, S. (2008). The perverse organisation and its deadly sins. Karnac Books.
Google Scholar CrossrefLouw, L. and Mayer, C.H. (2008). Internationalisation at a selected university, South African Journal of Higher Education 22(3), 615-628.
Google Scholar CrossrefLyth, I.M. (1989). The dynamics of the social: Selected essays, Volume 2. London: Free Association Books.
Google Scholar CrossrefMayer, C.-H. (2016). "I find that what I do is at total odds..." Holistic wellness in a woman leader working in a male-dominated engineering profession. Géneros - Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies, 5(3), 1098-1124. doi: 10.17583/generos.2016.1806.
Google Scholar CrossrefMayer, C.H. and Barnard, A. (2015). Balancing the scales of gender and culture in contemporary South Africa, In S. Safdar and N. Kosakowska (Eds), The Psychology of Gender through the Lens of Culture, pp. 327-353, New York, Springer.
Google Scholar CrossrefMayer, C.H., & Surtee, S. (2015). The leadership preferences of women leaders working in Higher Education. Generos, Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies, 4(1), 612-636. doi: 10.4471/generos.2015.49
Google Scholar CrossrefMayer, C.H., Surtee, S. and Barnard, A. (2015). Women leaders in higher education: a psycho-spiritual perspective, South African Journal of Psychology 45(1), 102-115.
Google Scholar CrossrefMayer, C.H., Surtee, S. and May, M.S. (2015). The meaningfulness of work for a diverse group of women working in higher education institutions, South African Journal of Higher Education 29(6), 182-205.
Google Scholar CrossrefMdlongwa, S. (2014). An exploration of the work-family experiences of black professional women in South Africa, (Unpublished master’s thesis), Cape Town, University of Cape Town.
Google Scholar CrossrefMiller, E.J. (1993). From dependency to autonomy: Studies in organization and change. London: Free Association.
Google Scholar CrossrefMorley, L. (2014). Lost leaders: women in the global academy. Higher Education Research and Development, 33, 114-128.
Google Scholar CrossrefMotsoaledi, L and Cillers, F. (2012). Executive coaching in diversity from the systems psychodynamic perspective. South African Journal of Industrial and Organisational Psychology, 38(2),
Google Scholar CrossrefMudzumi, P.T. (2013), Work stress, work-home interference and organisational culture of insurance employees in Zimbabwe, Unpublished Master’s Dissertation, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
Google Scholar CrossrefMyburg, H. (2009). The experience of organisational development consultants working in the systems psychodynamic stance. Retrieved from http://uir.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/1473.
Google Scholar CrossrefNaik, B. (2014). The systems psychodynamics underlying the work-family interface amongst managerial women in the public sector (Doctoral dissertation). University of South Africa: Pretoria.
Google Scholar CrossrefNewman, K.S. and DeLannoy, A. (2014). After Freedom: The rise of the post-apartheid generation in democratic South Africa. Beacon Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefNewton, J., Long, S., and Siever, B. (2006). Coaching in depth: The organisational role analysis method. London: Karnac.
Google Scholar CrossrefNIOSH. (2009). Publications and products. Stress at Work, 99.
Google Scholar CrossrefNohria, N. and Khurana, R. (2010). Handbook of leadership theory and practice. Boston Harvard Business Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefPapadopoulos, N. (2015). Reconceptualing social defence theory for the purpose of organisational-level change: Causes, consequences and the contribution of grid - group Cultural theory. Doctoral Thesis. http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/2438/13447/1/FulltextThesis.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefRamgoolam, S. (2005). Experiences of employment equity in the coal mining industry, Unpublished Master’s Dissertation, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
Google Scholar CrossrefRatner, C. (2002). Subjectivity and objectivity in qualitative methodology, Forum: Qualitative Social Research 3(3), Retrieved from: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/829/1800.
Google Scholar CrossrefRyan, M.K. and Haslam, A. (2005). The glass cliff: Evidence that women are overrepresented in precarious leadership positins. British Journal of Management 16, 81-90.
Google Scholar CrossrefSchruijer, S.G.L. and Curseu, P.L. (2014). Looking at the gap between psychological and psychodynamic perspectives on group dynamics historically. Journal of Organizational Change Management 27(2), 232-245.
Google Scholar CrossrefShemla, M., Meyer, B., Greer, L., and Jehna, K.A. (2014). Review of perceived diversity in teams: Does how members perceive their team's composition affect team processes and outcomes? Journal of Organizational Behaviour 37(1), 89–106.
Google Scholar CrossrefShongwe, M. (2014). Systems psychodynamic experiences of professionals in acting positions in a South African organisation. Retrieved from http://uir.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/14616.
Google Scholar CrossrefSiddique, A. A., Hassan D., Khan, M. and Fatima, U. (2011). Impact of academic leadership on faculty's motivation, and organizational effectiveness in higher education system, International Journal of Academic Research, 3(3), 730-737.
Google Scholar CrossrefSievers, B. (2009). Psychoanalytic studies of organizations: Contributions from the International Society for the Psychoanalytic Study of Organizations. London, England: Karnac.
Google Scholar CrossrefStapley, L. (2006). Individuals, groups, and organizations beneath the surface: An introduction. Karnac Books.
Google Scholar CrossrefSteyn, M., and Cilliers, F. (2016). The systems psychodynamic experiences of organisational transformation amongst support staff. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology/SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde, 42(1), a1367. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v42i1.1367
Google Scholar CrossrefTerre Blanche, M., Durrheim, K. and Kelly, K. (2006). First steps in qualitative data analysis, In M. Terre Blanche, K. Durrheim and D. Painter (Eds.), Research in practice. Applied methods for the social sciences, pp. 321-344, Cape Town, University of Cape Town.
Google Scholar CrossrefTonder, V. (2012). Group-as-a-whole as a context for studying individual behaviour : A group diagnostic intervention, 1–12. http://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v38i2.1011
Google Scholar CrossrefTownley, B. (2008). Reasons' neglect: Rationality and organising. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefTracy, S.J. (2010). Qualitative Quality: Eight "Big-Tent" Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research, Qualitative Inquiry 16(10), 837-851.
Google Scholar CrossrefVan Wyk, M. (2012). Women leaders, personal leadership and challenges, (Unpublished master’s thesis), Johannesburg, University of Johannesburg.
Google Scholar CrossrefVikkelso, S. (2012). The fragility of a robust therapeutic technique: the case of BionÄs experience group. Theory and Psychology, 22, 213-233.
Google Scholar CrossrefYin, R. K. (2009), Case study research: Design and methods, 4th edition, London, Sage Publications.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.