Tools of State: Using Research to Inform Policy Decisions in Higher Education
https://doi.org/10.4471/rimcis.2013.17
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
For many decades, states and the federal government have used both qualitative and quantitative studies to inform policy decisions, yet there have been longstanding concerns among qualitative researchers that their work is treated as second class. This paper examines an alternative construction of the problem. Policymakers in states and federal agencies treat policy research as tools of state—instruments to be used by policy makers—a practice in conflict with the moral stance of many qualitative researchers. Recognizing this problem, I provide guidance for constructing quantitative and qualitative research to inform decisions on policies on equity in preparation for, access to, and academic success in higher education without undermining the researchers’ quest for truth.
Downloads
References
Advanced Technology, Inc., & Westat, Inc. (1983). Quality control study: Final report. Reston, VA: Author.
Google Scholar CrossrefBecker, W. E. (2004). Omitted variables and sample selection in studies of college-going decisions. In E. P. St. John (Ed.), Public policy and college access: Investigating the federal and state roles in equalizing postsecondary opportunity, Readings on equal education Vol. 19 (pp. 65-86). New York: AMS Press, Inc.
Google Scholar CrossrefCarnes, B. M. (1987). The campus cost explosion: College tuitions are unnecessarily high. Policy Review, 40, 68-71.
Google Scholar CrossrefDaun-Barnett N., Fisher, A. S., & Williams, K. L. (2009). Inquiry in action in the Indiana Project on Academic Success: A formative evaluation of action inquiry in a multicampus context. In Hossler, D., Gross, J., & Ziskin, M. (Eds.), Enhancing institutional and state initiatives to increase student success: Studies of the Indiana Project on Academic Success, Readings on equal education, Vol. 24 pp. 141-168. New York: AMS Press Inc.
Google Scholar CrossrefFinn, C. E., Jr. (1988, July/August). Judgment time for higher education in the court of public opinion. Change, 20(4), 35-38.
Google Scholar CrossrefHabermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Vols. 1 & 2. Cambridge, UK :Polity Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefHabermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 2. Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reasoning (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefHabermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefHarris III, F., Bensimon, B. M., & Bishop, R. (2010). The Equity Scorecard: A New Way to Help Colleges and Universities Educate Young Men of Color. In C. Edley, Jr. and J. Ruiz de Velasco (Eds.), Changing Places: How Communities Will Improve the Health of Boys of Color. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefHearn, J. C. (1993). The paradox of growth in federal aid for college students, 1965-1990. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, Vol. 9 (pp. 94-153). New York: Agathon Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefHearn, J. C., & Holdsworth, J. M. (2004). Federal student aid: The shift from grants to loans. In E. P. St. John & M. D. Parsons (Eds.), Public funding of higher education: Changing contexts and new rationales (pp. 40-59). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefHeller, D. E. (2004). The changing nature of financial aid. Academe, 90(4), 36-39.
Google Scholar CrossrefHossler, D., Ziskin, M., & Gross, J. (2009). Getting serious about institutional performance in students retention: Research-based lessons on effective policies and practice. About Campus. 13(6): 2-11.
Google Scholar CrossrefKirshstein, R. J., Tikoff, V. K., Masten, C., & St. John, E. P. (1990). Trends in institutional costs. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Education Office of Planning, Budget and Evaluation. Washington, DC: Pelavin Associates.
Google Scholar CrossrefMacey, D. (2000). The Penguin dictionary of critical theory. New York: Penguin.
Google Scholar CrossrefManset, G., St. John, E. P., Hu, S., & Gordon, D. (2002). Early literacy practices as predictors of reading related outcomes: Tests scores, test passing rates, retention, and special education referral. Exceptionality, 10, 11-28.
Google Scholar CrossrefPublic Policy Institute of California. (2008). A. Alan Post Donates California Landscape Paintings to PPIC. Press Release. Retrieved 2/16/11 at: http://www.ppic.org/main/pressrelease.asp?i=829
Google Scholar CrossrefRawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefRawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar Crossref(Rutsberg, Richburg-Hays, etc [add], 2011 MDRC report
Google Scholar CrossrefSt. John, E. P. (1980). Management systems development: An intervention model for developing colleges and universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 5(3), 285-300.
Google Scholar CrossrefSt. John, E. P. (1981). Public policy and college management: Title III of the Higher Education Act. New York: Praeger Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefSt. John, E. P. (1991). The transformation of liberal arts colleges: An analysis of selected case studies. Review of Higher Education, 15(1), 83-108.
Google Scholar CrossrefSt. John, E. P. (1992). Changes in pricing behavior in the 1980s: An analysis of selected case studies. The Journal of Higher Education, 63(2), 165-187.
Google Scholar CrossrefSt. John, E. P. (1994). Prices, productivity and investment: Assessing financial strategies in higher education. ASHE/ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 3. Washington, DC: George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
Google Scholar CrossrefSt. John, E. P. (Ed.) (2007). Confronting educational inequality: Reframing, building understanding, and making change, Readings on equal education, Vol. 22. New York: AMS Press, Inc.
Google Scholar CrossrefSt. John, E. P. (2009a). Action, reflection and social justice: Integrating moral reasoning into professional education. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefSt. John, E. P. (2009b) College organization and professional development: Integrating moral reasoning and reflective practice. NY: Routledge-Taylor.
Google Scholar CrossrefSt. John, E. P. (in press-a). Research, Actionable Knowledge, and Social Change. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Google Scholar CrossrefSt. John, E. P. (in press-b). Responses to the call for public accountability: Using student data systems to facilitate improvement in degree attainment, In D. E. Heller (Ed.), The states and public higher education policy: Affordability, access, and accountability (2nd edition). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefSt. John, E. P., & Hossler, D. (1998). Higher education desegregation in the post-Fordice legal environment: A critical-empirical perspective. In R. E. Fossey (Ed.), Race, the courts, and equal education: The limits of the law, Readings on equal education, Vol. 15 (pp.123-156). New York: AMS Press, Inc.
Google Scholar CrossrefSt. John, E. P., Hu, S., & Fisher, A. S. (2010). Breaking through the access barrier: Academic capital formation informing public policy. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefSt. John, E. P., Loescher, S. A., & Bardzell, J. S. (2003). Improving reading and literacy in grades 1-5: A resource guide to research-based programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Google Scholar CrossrefSt. John, E. P., Manset-Williamson, G. M., Chung, C. G., & Michael, R. (2005, August). Assessing the rationales for educational reforms: An examination of policy claims about professional development, comprehensive reform, and direct instruction. Education Administration Quarterly, 41(3), 480-519.
Google Scholar CrossrefSt. John, E. P., & Musoba, G. D. (2010). Pathways to academic success: Expanding opportunity for underrepresented students. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefSt. John, E. P., & Noell, J. (1987). Policy issues and data bases: What do we want to do and can we? Background Paper 1 for the OPBE Conference on Student Aid Cost Models. Washington, DC: Pelavin Associates.
Google Scholar CrossrefSt. John, E. P., & Robinson, L. A. (1985). Redesign of the delivery systems for federal student aid programs. Cause/Effect, 8(5), 46-48.
Google Scholar CrossrefSt. John, E. P., & Sepanik, R. (1982). A framework for improving management of financial aid offices. In M. Kramer (Ed.), Meeting student aid needs in a period of retrenchment. New Directions for Higher Education, No. 40 (pp. 57-68). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar CrossrefSt. John, E. P. & Wilkerson, M. (Eds.), (2006). Reframing persistence research to support academic success. New Directions for Institutional Research No. 130. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar CrossrefSen, A. (2009). The idea of justice, Cambridge: Belknap.
Google Scholar CrossrefTierney, W. G. (2006). Trust and the Public Good. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
Google Scholar CrossrefTheobald, N. (2003). The need for issues-driven school funding reform in urban schools. In L. F. Mirón & E. P. St. John (Eds.), Reinterpreting urban school reform: Have urban schools failed, or has the reform movement failed urban schools? (pp. 33-52). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefWeathersby, G. B., & Balderston, F. E. (1972). PPBS in higher education planning and management: Part I, an overview. Higher Education, 1, 191-206.
Google Scholar CrossrefWeathersby, G. B., Jacobs, F., Jackson, G. A., St. John, E. P., & Tyler, T. (1977). The development of institutions of higher education: Theory and assessment of four possible areas of federal intervention. In M. Guttentage (Ed.), The evaluation studies review annual, Vol. 2 (pp. 488-546). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefWildavsky, A. (1969). Rescuing policy analysis from PPBS. Public Administration Review, Vol. 29, No. 2 (Mar. - Apr., 1969), pp. 189-202. http://www.jstor.org/stable/973700.
Google Scholar CrossrefWildavsky, A. (1979). Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.