The Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing: The Matthew Effect in Online Education

Amany Saleh, Heath Sanders

Abstract


In our globally and technologically connected world, many universities raced to offer online, college degrees to populations who otherwise would not have access to higher education. They promised high quality, rigorous, flexible, accessible, and affordable programs. Colleges and universities pledged to support these students to ensure theirsuccess within an online environment. However, Canchola (2011) argued that online students rarely receive the support they were promised. Sandeen and Barr (2006) argued many online programs increase students’ dissatisfaction with higher education and increase their drop-out rate. As a result, such programs rather than help students achieve their goals; they set them back academically and financially. This serves only to intensify The Matthew Effect for students. The authors offer recommendations for alleviating TheMatthew Effect and share guidelines for maintaining high quality, responsive online education.

Keywords


The Matthew Effect; online education; Higher education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aborisade, P. (2013). Investigating African 'digital-immigrant' students' reactions to moodle resources. Higher Education of Social Science, 4(3), 68-77.

Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Class differences: Online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group..

Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Ouahog Research Group.

Bolliger, D.U., & Erichsen, E.A. (2013) Student satisfaction with blended and online based on personality types. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39(1), 1-23. Retrieved from: http://cjlt.csj.ualberta.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/655

Bourdieu, P. (2002). The forms of capital, in Nicole Woolsey Biggart, (Ed.), Readings in economic sociology, (p. 280-291). Malden, MA: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/9780470755679.ch15

Browne, K.J. (2011). The Free Education Matthew Effect. Unfaculty. Retrieved from http://www.unfaculty.org/2011/09/free-education- matthew-effect.html

Saleh & Sanders – Online Higher Education

Canchola, Y. N. (2011, April). How for-profit colleges fail their students. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/How-For-Profit-Colleges-Fail/129619/

Chang, S. H., & Smith, R. A. (2008). Effectiveness of personal interaction in a learner-centered paradigm distance education class based on student satisfaction. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4), 407-426.

Cho, M.H. (2012). Online student orientation in higher education: a developmental study. Education Technology Research Development, 60, 1051-1069. doi: 10.1007/s11423-012-9271-4

Cook, D.A. (2007). Web-Based Learning: Pros, Cons, and Controversies. Education for Primary Care, 18, 417-441. doi: 10.1017/S146342360700045X

Cunningham, J. (2010). Self-Direction: A Critical Tool in Distance Education. Common Ground Journal, 7 (2): 89-100.

Dierkmann, F. J. (2001). Everything you wanted to know about e-learning (but didn’t know where to log on to ask). Credit Union Journal, 5(30), 6-7.

Dillon, S. (2007). Troubles grow for a university built on profits. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/11/education/11phonenix.html?ei=5 124&en=dee1fea9c7

Dillon, C.L. & Cintron, R. (1997). Distance Education and the Community College: From Convention to Vision. New Directions for Community Colleges, 1997(99), 93-103. doi: 10.1002/cc.9910

DiPrete, T.A. & Eirich, G.M. (2005). Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments. Retrieved from http://www.columbia.edu/~tad61/CA_AR112205.pdf

Dzakiria, H. (2008). Students’ Account of the Need for Continuous Support in a Distance Learning Program. Open Learning, 23, 103-111. doi: 10.1080/02680510802051913

EduPunk and the Matthew Effect. (2010). Retrieved from http://highered.blogspot.com/11/edupunk-andmatthew-effect.html

RISE – International Journal of Sociology of Education, 3(1) 47

Ekici, F., Kara, I.A., & Ekici, E. (2012), The primary student teachers’ views about a blended learning application in a basic physics course. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13 (2), 291-310.

Endres, M. L., Chowdhury, S., Frye, C., & Hurtubis, C. A. (2009). The multifaceted nature of online MBA student satisfaction and impacts on behavioral intentions. Journal of Education for Business, 84(5), 304-312. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.84.5.304-312

Free Education Matthew Effect. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.unfaculty.org/2011/09/free-education-matthew-effect.html

Gedviliene, G. (2010). Adult Distance Learning Quality in University Studies. Bridges, 51, 133-143.

Grady, J. R. (2013). Improving student satisfaction with large-scale, compressed timeline online graduate education courses. Paper presented at E-Learn2013 World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Education, October, Las Vegas, NV.

Grill, J. (1999). Access to Learning: Rethinking the Promise of Distance Education. Adult Learning, 10(4): 32-39.

Hempenstall, K. (1996). The gulf between educational research and policy: The example of Direct Instruction and Whole Language. Behavior Change, 13, 33-46.

Huh, J., & Atsusi, H. (2004). Reading assessment strategies for online learners. A paper presented at Association for Educational Communication and Technology, Chicago, IL, April.

Jefferson, R.N., & Arnold, L.W. (2009). Effects of virtual education on academic cultures: Perceived advantages and disadvantages. US- China Education Review, 6 (3), 61-66.

Jones. C. H., & Slate, J. R. (2009). Online courses, Instructional quality, and Economics: A conceptual analysis. Retrieved from http://cnx.org/content/m29669/1.1/

Koba, M. (2011, March 7). Are ivyleague diplomas still worth the price? USA Today, Retrieved

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/perfi/college/2011-03-05- cnbc-ivy-league_N.htm

Saleh & Sanders – Online Higher Education

McCloughlin, C. & Marshall, L. (2000). Scaffolding: A Model for Learner Support in an Online Teaching Environment. Open Learning, 7, 78- 85.

McGuire, L., & Muffo, A. (2003). For-Profit Higher Education: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly? Retrieved from filebox.vt.edu/users/lmcguire/For%20Profit%20Education.doc

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009).

Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning:

A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Available from the U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based- practices/finalreport.pdf

Merton, R.K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810): 56-63. Retrieved from

http://www.unc.edu/~fbaum/teaching/PLSC541_Fall06/Merton_Scien

ce_1968.pdf

Mominóand, J. M., Sigalés, C., & Meneses, J. (2008). La escuela en la

sociedad red. Internet en la educación primaria y secundaria.

Barcelona: Ariel.

Mooneyhan, A. (2012). Comparing three delivery methods in concepts of

fitness course. Paper presented at the Annual European Teacher

Education Network, Coimbra, Portugal, April 2012.

Morgan, B. (2010) New Literacies in the Classroom: Digital Capital,

Student Identity, and Third Space. International Journal of

Technology, Knowledge, & Society, 6(2): 221-239.

Muchinsky, P. M. (2006). Psychology applied to work (8th ed.). Belmont,

CA: Thomson. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc. Graduate training programs in industrial-organizational psychology and related fields. Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/GTP/.

New millennium learners: initial findings on the effects of digital technologies on school-age learners. (2008). Center for Educational Research and Innovation. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40554230.pdf

OECD. (2005) E-learning in tertiary education: where do we stand? Paris: OECD/CERI In Schiffman, Stephen, Vignare, Karen & Geith,

RISE – International Journal of Sociology of Education, 3(1) 49

Christine (Eds.) (2007) Why do higher education institutions pursue online education? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), pp61-71 Retrieved from http://www.sloan- .org/publications/jaln/v11n2/pdf/v11n2_schiffman.pdf

Olaniyan, D.A., & Okemakinde, T. (2008). Human Capital Theory: Implications for Educational Development. European Journal of Scientific Research. Retrieved from http://www.eurojournals.com/ejsr_24_2_01.pdf.

Palfrey, J. &, Gasser, U. (2010). Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students. Volume 2: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.

Pasquier, D. (2008). From parental control to peer pressure: cultural transmission and conformism. In S. Livingstone & K. Drotner (Eds.), International handbook of children, media and culture (pp. 448-459). London: Sage.

Russell, V., & Curtis, W. (2013). Comparing a large- and small-scale online language course: An examination of teacher and learner perceptions. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.07.002

Saleh, A. (2011). A closer look at the marriage of for-profit and public higher education institutions. Paper presented at the 13th Annual International Conference on Education, Athens, Greece.

Saleh, A. (2012). A Closer look at online graduate degree programs in public institutions. Review of Higher Education and Self-Learning, 5 (16).

Sandeen, A., & Barr, M. (2006). Critical issues for students affairs: Challenges and opportunities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Schultz, T.W. (1961). Investment in Human Capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1-17.

Song, L., Singleton, E.S., Hill, J.R., Koh, M.H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet and Higher Education, 7: 59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.11.003

Saleh & Sanders – Online Higher Education

Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effect in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21 (4), 360-407. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1

Walberg, J. H., & Tsai, S. (1983). Matthew Effect in Education. American Educational Research Journal, 20 (3), 359-373.

Walker, C. E., & Kelly, E. (2007). Online instruction: Student satisfaction, kudos, and pet peeves. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(4), 309-319. doi: 10.3102/00028312020003359

Williams, A., Birch, E., & Hancock, P. (2012). The impact of online lecture recordings on student performance. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 28 (2), 199-213.

Xu, J. & Hampolen-Thompson, G. (2012). Cultural Reproduction, Cultural Mobility, Cultural Resources, or Trivial Effect? A Comparative Approach to Cultural Capital and Educational Performance. Comparative Education Review, 56 (1): 98-124. doi: 10.1086/661289

Young, S. (2006). Student Views of Effective Online Teaching in Higher Education. American Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 65-77. doi: 10.1207/s15389286ajde2002_2

Young, S., Cantrell, P., & Shaw, D. (2001). Online Instruction: New Roles for Teacher and Students. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 5(4), 11- 16.

Zhang, P. (1998). A Case Study on Technology Use in Distance Learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(1): 398-420.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4471/rise.2014.02

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM






RISE - Revista Internacional de Sociología de la Educación | ISSN: 2014-3575

Depósito Legal: B.34292-2012 | https://rise.hipatiapress.com | rise@hipatiapress.com