Implementando y Evaluando un Programa de Mentorazgo Tecnológico Desarrollado para Formadores de Docentes: Una Estructura 6M
Palabras clave:
Descargas
Resumen
El propósito de esta investigación básica es determinar los problemas experimentados en el Programa de Mentorazgo Tecnológico (PGT), y el estudio analiza cómo estos problemas afectan al proceso en general. La implementación se llevó a cabo con los formadores de docentes de la facultad de educación. 8 estudiantes de doctorado (mentores) proporcionaron la implementación de tutoría tecnológica durante un periodo académico a 9 formadores de docentes (aprendices) empleados en la Facultad de Educación. Los datos fueron recolectados a través del aprendiz y el mentor con un formulario de entrevista, reflexiones del mentor y reuniones de reflexión sobre la organización. Como resultado, se determinaron los problemas basados en el mentor, en el aprendiz y en la organización / institución. Con el fin de llevar a cabo TMP más eficaz y con éxito, se sugirió un marco 6M (Modificación, Reunión, Adecuación, Dirección, Mentorización, Supervisión) en el ámbito de este estudio. Podría decirse que se encontraron con menos problemas y que el proceso se llevará a cabo de manera más eficaz y con éxito cuando se tome la estructura de este marco en consideración.Descargas
Referencias
Balki, E., & Saban, A. (2009). Öğretmenlerin Bilişim Teknolojilerine İlişkin Algıları ve Uygulamaları: Özel Esentepe İlköğretim Okulu Örneği. İlköğretim Online, 8(3), 771-778.
Google Scholar CrossrefBrightman, H.J. (2006). Mentoring Faculty to Improve Teaching and Student Learning. Issues in Accounting Education, 21(2), 127-146.
Google Scholar CrossrefBrinkerhof, J. (2006). Effects of a long-duration, professiona l development academy on technological skills, computer self-efficacy, and technology integration beliefs and practices. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(1), 22-44.
Google Scholar CrossrefButler, T., & Chao, T. (2001). Partners for Change : Students as Effective Technology Mentors. Active Learning in Higher Education, 2, 101-113.
Google Scholar CrossrefChuang, H.-H. (2006). Making Connections. In A. Thompson, H.-H. Chuang & I. Sahin (Eds), Faculty mentoring: The power of students in developing expertise (pp. 59-69). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefChuang, H.-H., & Schmidt, D. (2006). Faculty technology mentoring programs. In A. Thompson, H.-H. Chuang & I. Sahin (Eds), Faculty mentoring: The power of students in developing expertise (pp. 29-46). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefCullimore, D. (1999). The use of new technologies in mentorship for teacher training. Management in Education, 13, 24-26.
Google Scholar CrossrefDenzin, N. K. (1970). The Research Act in Sociology. Chicago: Aldine.
Google Scholar CrossrefEarle, R. S. (2002). The Integration of instructional te chnology into public education: promises and challenges. Educational Technology, 42(1), 5-13.
Google Scholar CrossrefGeorgina, D.A. (2007). Integration of technology in higher education pedagogy. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks.
Google Scholar CrossrefGeorgina, D.A., & Hosford, C.C. (2009). Higher education faculty perceptions on technology integration and training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 690–696.
Google Scholar CrossrefGao, P., Wong, A.F.L., Choy, D. & Wu, J. (2011). Beginning teachers' understanding performances of technology integration, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 31(2), 211-223.
Google Scholar CrossrefHelland, B. A. (2004). Integration of information and communication Technology at Old Yale Road Elementary: Are we there yet?. Unpublished Master Thesis, Royal Roads University.
Google Scholar CrossrefHew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 223-252.
Google Scholar CrossrefJohnson, N. (2006). Learning to Mentor. In A. Thompson, H.-H. Chuang & I. Sahin (Eds), Faculty mentoring: The power of students in developing expertise (pp. 121-133). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefJones, S.T. (2002). Mentoring African American educational media and technology students. Tech Trends, 46, 2-14.
Google Scholar CrossrefKabakci, I., Odabasi, H.F. & Kilicer, K. (2010). Transformative learning-based mentoring for professional development of teacher educators in ICT: An approach for an emerging country. Journal of In-service Education/Professional Development in Education, 36(1-2), 263-273.
Google Scholar CrossrefKouadio, C. (2006). Technology Mentoring Through The Eyes of K-5 Practitioners. In A. Thompson, H.-H. Chuang & I. Sahin (Eds), Faculty mentoring: The power of students in developing expertise (pp. 94-104). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefKratcoski, A., Swan, K., & Mazzer, P. (2007). Teacher Technology Mentors. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology (RCETJ), 3(2), 26-32.
Google Scholar CrossrefLeh, A. S. (2005). Learned from service learning and reverse mentoring in faculty development: A case study in technology training. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 25-41.
Google Scholar CrossrefLumpkin, A. (2011). A Model for Mentoring University Faculty. The Educational Forum, 75, 357–368.
Google Scholar CrossrefMurray, M. (2001). Beyond the myths and magic of mentoring. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Google Scholar CrossrefOkojie, M.CPO., Olinzock, A.A., & Okojie-Boulder, T.C. (2006). The Pedagogy of Technology Integration. Journal of Technology Studies, 32(2), 66-71.
Google Scholar CrossrefPamuk, S., & Thompson, A.D. (2009). Development of a technology mentor survey instrument: Understanding student mentors’ benefits. Computers & Education, 53, 14-23.
Google Scholar CrossrefPelgrum, W.J. (2001). Obstacles to the integr ation of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37(2), 163-178.
Google Scholar CrossrefPoteat, L.F., Shockley, K.M. & Allen, T.D. (2009). Mentor-Protege Commitment Fit and Relationship Satisfaction in Academic Mentoring. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 332-337.
Google Scholar CrossrefSahin, I. (2006). Role of the faculty mentoring program in the adoption and diffusion of instructional technology. In A. Thompson, H.-H. Chuang & I. Sahin (Eds), Faculty mentoring: The power of students in developing expertise (pp. 13-28). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefSherman, R., Voight, J., Tibbetts, J., Evans, A., & Weidler, D. (2000). Adult educators' guide to designing instructor mentoring. Washington, D.C.: Pelavin Research Institute.
Google Scholar CrossrefSmith, S.J. (2000). Graduate Students Mentors for Technology Success. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 23(2), 167-182.
Google Scholar CrossrefSurry, D.W. (2005). A Model for Integra ting Instructional Technology into Higher Education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association , April 2002, New Orleans, LA.
Google Scholar CrossrefWan, J. (2009). Teacher educators’ computer technology integration at Utah State University. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis, Utah State University, Logan, Utah.
Google Scholar CrossrefWarring, D. F., & Lindquist, L. (1999). A collaborative mentor-mentee program based in Bloomington, Minnesota Public Schools. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
Google Scholar CrossrefWisniewski, S.T. (2010). Principals' perceptions of strategies for offsetting the barriers to technology integration in elementary schools in New Jersey. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis, Seton Hall University.
Google Scholar CrossrefWitte, M.M., & Wolf, S.E. (2003). Infusing Mentoring and Technology within Graduate Courses: Reflections in practice. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 11(1), 95-103.
Google Scholar CrossrefTatistcheff, R., Church, W., & Carberry, A. (2008). Students Teaching Teachers: Rethinking Professional Development for Technology. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
Google Scholar CrossrefThompson, A. (2006a). History of the faculty technology mentoring program. In A. Thompson, H.-H. Chuang & I. Sahin (Eds), Faculty mentoring: The power of students in developing expertise (pp. 1-12). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefThompson, A. (2006b). Lessons Learned. . In A. Thompson, H.-H. Chuang & I. Sahin (Eds), Faculty mentoring: The power of students in developing expertise (pp. 135-146). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefTracy, E.E., Jagsi, R., Starr, R., & Tarbell, N.J. (2004). Outcomes of a pilot faculty mentoring program. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 191(6), 1846-1850.
Google Scholar CrossrefYin, R. (2003). Case study research: design and methods (3rd Edition). London: Sage Publications, Inc.
Google Scholar CrossrefDescargas
Publicado
Almetric
Dimensions
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Todos los artículos se publican bajo copyright Creative Commons (CC BY). Los autores poseen los derechos de autor y conservan los derechos de publicación sin restricciones, pero los autores permiten que cualquiera descargue, reutilice, reimprima, modifique, distribuya y/o copie los artículos siempre que se cite la fuente original.
