The Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing: The Matthew Effect in Online Education

Authors

  • Amany Saleh Arkansas State University
  • Heath Sanders East Arkansas State Community College

https://doi.org/10.4471/rise.2014.02

Keywords:


Downloads

Abstract

In our globally and technologically connected world, many universities raced to offer online, college degrees to populations who otherwise would not have access to higher education. They promised high quality, rigorous, flexible, accessible, and affordable programs. Colleges and universities pledged to support these students to ensure theirsuccess within an online environment. However, Canchola (2011) argued that online students rarely receive the support they were promised. Sandeen and Barr (2006) argued many online programs increase students’ dissatisfaction with higher education and increase their drop-out rate. As a result, such programs rather than help students achieve their goals; they set them back academically and financially. This serves only to intensify The Matthew Effect for students. The authors offer recommendations for alleviating TheMatthew Effect and share guidelines for maintaining high quality, responsive online education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Amany Saleh, Arkansas State University

Professor of Curriculum and InstructionCenter for Excellence in EducationArkansas State University

Heath Sanders, East Arkansas State Community College

Heath Sanders is an Instructor of Sociology at East Arkansas Community College. He is also a doctoral student of Educational Leadership at Arkansas State University.

References

Aborisade, P. (2013). Investigating African 'digital-immigrant' students' reactions to moodle resources. Higher Education of Social Science, 4(3), 68-77.

Google Scholar Crossref

Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Class differences: Online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group..

Google Scholar Crossref

Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Ouahog Research Group.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bolliger, D.U., & Erichsen, E.A. (2013) Student satisfaction with blended and online based on personality types. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39(1), 1-23. Retrieved from: http://cjlt.csj.ualberta.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/655

Google Scholar Crossref

Bourdieu, P. (2002). The forms of capital, in Nicole Woolsey Biggart, (Ed.), Readings in economic sociology, (p. 280-291). Malden, MA: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/9780470755679.ch15

Google Scholar Crossref

Browne, K.J. (2011). The Free Education Matthew Effect. Unfaculty. Retrieved from http://www.unfaculty.org/2011/09/free-education- matthew-effect.html

Google Scholar Crossref

Saleh & Sanders – Online Higher Education

Google Scholar Crossref

Canchola, Y. N. (2011, April). How for-profit colleges fail their students. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/How-For-Profit-Colleges-Fail/129619/

Google Scholar Crossref

Chang, S. H., & Smith, R. A. (2008). Effectiveness of personal interaction in a learner-centered paradigm distance education class based on student satisfaction. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4), 407-426.

Google Scholar Crossref

Cho, M.H. (2012). Online student orientation in higher education: a developmental study. Education Technology Research Development, 60, 1051-1069. doi: 10.1007/s11423-012-9271-4

Google Scholar Crossref

Cook, D.A. (2007). Web-Based Learning: Pros, Cons, and Controversies. Education for Primary Care, 18, 417-441. doi: 10.1017/S146342360700045X

Google Scholar Crossref

Cunningham, J. (2010). Self-Direction: A Critical Tool in Distance Education. Common Ground Journal, 7 (2): 89-100.

Google Scholar Crossref

Dierkmann, F. J. (2001). Everything you wanted to know about e-learning (but didn’t know where to log on to ask). Credit Union Journal, 5(30), 6-7.

Google Scholar Crossref

Dillon, S. (2007). Troubles grow for a university built on profits. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/11/education/11phonenix.html?ei=5 124&en=dee1fea9c7

Google Scholar Crossref

Dillon, C.L. & Cintron, R. (1997). Distance Education and the Community College: From Convention to Vision. New Directions for Community Colleges, 1997(99), 93-103. doi: 10.1002/cc.9910

Google Scholar Crossref

DiPrete, T.A. & Eirich, G.M. (2005). Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments. Retrieved from http://www.columbia.edu/~tad61/CA_AR112205.pdf

Google Scholar Crossref

Dzakiria, H. (2008). Students’ Account of the Need for Continuous Support in a Distance Learning Program. Open Learning, 23, 103-111. doi: 10.1080/02680510802051913

Google Scholar Crossref

EduPunk and the Matthew Effect. (2010). Retrieved from http://highered.blogspot.com/11/edupunk-andmatthew-effect.html

Google Scholar Crossref

RISE – International Journal of Sociology of Education, 3(1) 47

Google Scholar Crossref

Ekici, F., Kara, I.A., & Ekici, E. (2012), The primary student teachers’ views about a blended learning application in a basic physics course. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13 (2), 291-310.

Google Scholar Crossref

Endres, M. L., Chowdhury, S., Frye, C., & Hurtubis, C. A. (2009). The multifaceted nature of online MBA student satisfaction and impacts on behavioral intentions. Journal of Education for Business, 84(5), 304-312. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.84.5.304-312

Google Scholar Crossref

Free Education Matthew Effect. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.unfaculty.org/2011/09/free-education-matthew-effect.html

Google Scholar Crossref

Gedviliene, G. (2010). Adult Distance Learning Quality in University Studies. Bridges, 51, 133-143.

Google Scholar Crossref

Grady, J. R. (2013). Improving student satisfaction with large-scale, compressed timeline online graduate education courses. Paper presented at E-Learn2013 World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Education, October, Las Vegas, NV.

Google Scholar Crossref

Grill, J. (1999). Access to Learning: Rethinking the Promise of Distance Education. Adult Learning, 10(4): 32-39.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hempenstall, K. (1996). The gulf between educational research and policy: The example of Direct Instruction and Whole Language. Behavior Change, 13, 33-46.

Google Scholar Crossref

Huh, J., & Atsusi, H. (2004). Reading assessment strategies for online learners. A paper presented at Association for Educational Communication and Technology, Chicago, IL, April.

Google Scholar Crossref

Jefferson, R.N., & Arnold, L.W. (2009). Effects of virtual education on academic cultures: Perceived advantages and disadvantages. US- China Education Review, 6 (3), 61-66.

Google Scholar Crossref

Jones. C. H., & Slate, J. R. (2009). Online courses, Instructional quality, and Economics: A conceptual analysis. Retrieved from http://cnx.org/content/m29669/1.1/

Google Scholar Crossref

Koba, M. (2011, March 7). Are ivyleague diplomas still worth the price? USA Today, Retrieved

Google Scholar Crossref

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/perfi/college/2011-03-05- cnbc-ivy-league_N.htm

Google Scholar Crossref

Saleh & Sanders – Online Higher Education

Google Scholar Crossref

McCloughlin, C. & Marshall, L. (2000). Scaffolding: A Model for Learner Support in an Online Teaching Environment. Open Learning, 7, 78- 85.

Google Scholar Crossref

McGuire, L., & Muffo, A. (2003). For-Profit Higher Education: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly? Retrieved from filebox.vt.edu/users/lmcguire/For%20Profit%20Education.doc

Google Scholar Crossref

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009).

Google Scholar Crossref

Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning:

Google Scholar Crossref

A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Available from the U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based- practices/finalreport.pdf

Google Scholar Crossref

Merton, R.K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810): 56-63. Retrieved from

Google Scholar Crossref

http://www.unc.edu/~fbaum/teaching/PLSC541_Fall06/Merton_Scien

Google Scholar Crossref

ce_1968.pdf

Google Scholar Crossref

Mominóand, J. M., Sigalés, C., & Meneses, J. (2008). La escuela en la

Google Scholar Crossref

sociedad red. Internet en la educación primaria y secundaria.

Google Scholar Crossref

Barcelona: Ariel.

Google Scholar Crossref

Mooneyhan, A. (2012). Comparing three delivery methods in concepts of

Google Scholar Crossref

fitness course. Paper presented at the Annual European Teacher

Google Scholar Crossref

Education Network, Coimbra, Portugal, April 2012.

Google Scholar Crossref

Morgan, B. (2010) New Literacies in the Classroom: Digital Capital,

Google Scholar Crossref

Student Identity, and Third Space. International Journal of

Google Scholar Crossref

Technology, Knowledge, & Society, 6(2): 221-239.

Google Scholar Crossref

Muchinsky, P. M. (2006). Psychology applied to work (8th ed.). Belmont,

Google Scholar Crossref

CA: Thomson. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc. Graduate training programs in industrial-organizational psychology and related fields. Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/GTP/.

Google Scholar Crossref

New millennium learners: initial findings on the effects of digital technologies on school-age learners. (2008). Center for Educational Research and Innovation. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40554230.pdf

Google Scholar Crossref

OECD. (2005) E-learning in tertiary education: where do we stand? Paris: OECD/CERI In Schiffman, Stephen, Vignare, Karen & Geith,

Google Scholar Crossref

RISE – International Journal of Sociology of Education, 3(1) 49

Google Scholar Crossref

Christine (Eds.) (2007) Why do higher education institutions pursue online education? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), pp61-71 Retrieved from http://www.sloan- .org/publications/jaln/v11n2/pdf/v11n2_schiffman.pdf

Google Scholar Crossref

Olaniyan, D.A., & Okemakinde, T. (2008). Human Capital Theory: Implications for Educational Development. European Journal of Scientific Research. Retrieved from http://www.eurojournals.com/ejsr_24_2_01.pdf.

Google Scholar Crossref

Palfrey, J. &, Gasser, U. (2010). Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students. Volume 2: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pasquier, D. (2008). From parental control to peer pressure: cultural transmission and conformism. In S. Livingstone & K. Drotner (Eds.), International handbook of children, media and culture (pp. 448-459). London: Sage.

Google Scholar Crossref

Russell, V., & Curtis, W. (2013). Comparing a large- and small-scale online language course: An examination of teacher and learner perceptions. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.07.002

Google Scholar Crossref

Saleh, A. (2011). A closer look at the marriage of for-profit and public higher education institutions. Paper presented at the 13th Annual International Conference on Education, Athens, Greece.

Google Scholar Crossref

Saleh, A. (2012). A Closer look at online graduate degree programs in public institutions. Review of Higher Education and Self-Learning, 5 (16).

Google Scholar Crossref

Sandeen, A., & Barr, M. (2006). Critical issues for students affairs: Challenges and opportunities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Google Scholar Crossref

Schultz, T.W. (1961). Investment in Human Capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1-17.

Google Scholar Crossref

Song, L., Singleton, E.S., Hill, J.R., Koh, M.H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet and Higher Education, 7: 59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.11.003

Google Scholar Crossref

Saleh & Sanders – Online Higher Education

Google Scholar Crossref

Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effect in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21 (4), 360-407. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1

Google Scholar Crossref

Walberg, J. H., & Tsai, S. (1983). Matthew Effect in Education. American Educational Research Journal, 20 (3), 359-373.

Google Scholar Crossref

Walker, C. E., & Kelly, E. (2007). Online instruction: Student satisfaction, kudos, and pet peeves. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(4), 309-319. doi: 10.3102/00028312020003359

Google Scholar Crossref

Williams, A., Birch, E., & Hancock, P. (2012). The impact of online lecture recordings on student performance. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 28 (2), 199-213.

Google Scholar Crossref

Xu, J. & Hampolen-Thompson, G. (2012). Cultural Reproduction, Cultural Mobility, Cultural Resources, or Trivial Effect? A Comparative Approach to Cultural Capital and Educational Performance. Comparative Education Review, 56 (1): 98-124. doi: 10.1086/661289

Google Scholar Crossref

Young, S. (2006). Student Views of Effective Online Teaching in Higher Education. American Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 65-77. doi: 10.1207/s15389286ajde2002_2

Google Scholar Crossref

Young, S., Cantrell, P., & Shaw, D. (2001). Online Instruction: New Roles for Teacher and Students. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 5(4), 11- 16.

Google Scholar Crossref

Zhang, P. (1998). A Case Study on Technology Use in Distance Learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(1): 398-420.

Google Scholar Crossref

Downloads

Published

2014-02-25

Almetric

Dimensions

How to Cite

Saleh, A., & Sanders, H. (2014). The Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing: The Matthew Effect in Online Education. International Journal of Sociology of Education, 3(1), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.4471/rise.2014.02

Issue

Section

Articles