The Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing: The Matthew Effect in Online Education
https://doi.org/10.4471/rise.2014.02
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
In our globally and technologically connected world, many universities raced to offer online, college degrees to populations who otherwise would not have access to higher education. They promised high quality, rigorous, flexible, accessible, and affordable programs. Colleges and universities pledged to support these students to ensure theirsuccess within an online environment. However, Canchola (2011) argued that online students rarely receive the support they were promised. Sandeen and Barr (2006) argued many online programs increase students’ dissatisfaction with higher education and increase their drop-out rate. As a result, such programs rather than help students achieve their goals; they set them back academically and financially. This serves only to intensify The Matthew Effect for students. The authors offer recommendations for alleviating TheMatthew Effect and share guidelines for maintaining high quality, responsive online education.Downloads
References
Aborisade, P. (2013). Investigating African 'digital-immigrant' students' reactions to moodle resources. Higher Education of Social Science, 4(3), 68-77.
Google Scholar CrossrefAllen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Class differences: Online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group..
Google Scholar CrossrefAllen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Ouahog Research Group.
Google Scholar CrossrefBolliger, D.U., & Erichsen, E.A. (2013) Student satisfaction with blended and online based on personality types. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39(1), 1-23. Retrieved from: http://cjlt.csj.ualberta.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/655
Google Scholar CrossrefBourdieu, P. (2002). The forms of capital, in Nicole Woolsey Biggart, (Ed.), Readings in economic sociology, (p. 280-291). Malden, MA: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/9780470755679.ch15
Google Scholar CrossrefBrowne, K.J. (2011). The Free Education Matthew Effect. Unfaculty. Retrieved from http://www.unfaculty.org/2011/09/free-education- matthew-effect.html
Google Scholar CrossrefSaleh & Sanders – Online Higher Education
Google Scholar CrossrefCanchola, Y. N. (2011, April). How for-profit colleges fail their students. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/How-For-Profit-Colleges-Fail/129619/
Google Scholar CrossrefChang, S. H., & Smith, R. A. (2008). Effectiveness of personal interaction in a learner-centered paradigm distance education class based on student satisfaction. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4), 407-426.
Google Scholar CrossrefCho, M.H. (2012). Online student orientation in higher education: a developmental study. Education Technology Research Development, 60, 1051-1069. doi: 10.1007/s11423-012-9271-4
Google Scholar CrossrefCook, D.A. (2007). Web-Based Learning: Pros, Cons, and Controversies. Education for Primary Care, 18, 417-441. doi: 10.1017/S146342360700045X
Google Scholar CrossrefCunningham, J. (2010). Self-Direction: A Critical Tool in Distance Education. Common Ground Journal, 7 (2): 89-100.
Google Scholar CrossrefDierkmann, F. J. (2001). Everything you wanted to know about e-learning (but didn’t know where to log on to ask). Credit Union Journal, 5(30), 6-7.
Google Scholar CrossrefDillon, S. (2007). Troubles grow for a university built on profits. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/11/education/11phonenix.html?ei=5 124&en=dee1fea9c7
Google Scholar CrossrefDillon, C.L. & Cintron, R. (1997). Distance Education and the Community College: From Convention to Vision. New Directions for Community Colleges, 1997(99), 93-103. doi: 10.1002/cc.9910
Google Scholar CrossrefDiPrete, T.A. & Eirich, G.M. (2005). Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments. Retrieved from http://www.columbia.edu/~tad61/CA_AR112205.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefDzakiria, H. (2008). Students’ Account of the Need for Continuous Support in a Distance Learning Program. Open Learning, 23, 103-111. doi: 10.1080/02680510802051913
Google Scholar CrossrefEduPunk and the Matthew Effect. (2010). Retrieved from http://highered.blogspot.com/11/edupunk-andmatthew-effect.html
Google Scholar CrossrefRISE – International Journal of Sociology of Education, 3(1) 47
Google Scholar CrossrefEkici, F., Kara, I.A., & Ekici, E. (2012), The primary student teachers’ views about a blended learning application in a basic physics course. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13 (2), 291-310.
Google Scholar CrossrefEndres, M. L., Chowdhury, S., Frye, C., & Hurtubis, C. A. (2009). The multifaceted nature of online MBA student satisfaction and impacts on behavioral intentions. Journal of Education for Business, 84(5), 304-312. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.84.5.304-312
Google Scholar CrossrefFree Education Matthew Effect. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.unfaculty.org/2011/09/free-education-matthew-effect.html
Google Scholar CrossrefGedviliene, G. (2010). Adult Distance Learning Quality in University Studies. Bridges, 51, 133-143.
Google Scholar CrossrefGrady, J. R. (2013). Improving student satisfaction with large-scale, compressed timeline online graduate education courses. Paper presented at E-Learn2013 World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Education, October, Las Vegas, NV.
Google Scholar CrossrefGrill, J. (1999). Access to Learning: Rethinking the Promise of Distance Education. Adult Learning, 10(4): 32-39.
Google Scholar CrossrefHempenstall, K. (1996). The gulf between educational research and policy: The example of Direct Instruction and Whole Language. Behavior Change, 13, 33-46.
Google Scholar CrossrefHuh, J., & Atsusi, H. (2004). Reading assessment strategies for online learners. A paper presented at Association for Educational Communication and Technology, Chicago, IL, April.
Google Scholar CrossrefJefferson, R.N., & Arnold, L.W. (2009). Effects of virtual education on academic cultures: Perceived advantages and disadvantages. US- China Education Review, 6 (3), 61-66.
Google Scholar CrossrefJones. C. H., & Slate, J. R. (2009). Online courses, Instructional quality, and Economics: A conceptual analysis. Retrieved from http://cnx.org/content/m29669/1.1/
Google Scholar CrossrefKoba, M. (2011, March 7). Are ivyleague diplomas still worth the price? USA Today, Retrieved
Google Scholar Crossrefhttp://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/perfi/college/2011-03-05- cnbc-ivy-league_N.htm
Google Scholar CrossrefSaleh & Sanders – Online Higher Education
Google Scholar CrossrefMcCloughlin, C. & Marshall, L. (2000). Scaffolding: A Model for Learner Support in an Online Teaching Environment. Open Learning, 7, 78- 85.
Google Scholar CrossrefMcGuire, L., & Muffo, A. (2003). For-Profit Higher Education: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly? Retrieved from filebox.vt.edu/users/lmcguire/For%20Profit%20Education.doc
Google Scholar CrossrefMeans, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009).
Google Scholar CrossrefEvaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning:
Google Scholar CrossrefA Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Available from the U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based- practices/finalreport.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefMerton, R.K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810): 56-63. Retrieved from
Google Scholar Crossrefhttp://www.unc.edu/~fbaum/teaching/PLSC541_Fall06/Merton_Scien
Google Scholar Crossrefce_1968.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefMominóand, J. M., Sigalés, C., & Meneses, J. (2008). La escuela en la
Google Scholar Crossrefsociedad red. Internet en la educación primaria y secundaria.
Google Scholar CrossrefBarcelona: Ariel.
Google Scholar CrossrefMooneyhan, A. (2012). Comparing three delivery methods in concepts of
Google Scholar Crossreffitness course. Paper presented at the Annual European Teacher
Google Scholar CrossrefEducation Network, Coimbra, Portugal, April 2012.
Google Scholar CrossrefMorgan, B. (2010) New Literacies in the Classroom: Digital Capital,
Google Scholar CrossrefStudent Identity, and Third Space. International Journal of
Google Scholar CrossrefTechnology, Knowledge, & Society, 6(2): 221-239.
Google Scholar CrossrefMuchinsky, P. M. (2006). Psychology applied to work (8th ed.). Belmont,
Google Scholar CrossrefCA: Thomson. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc. Graduate training programs in industrial-organizational psychology and related fields. Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/GTP/.
Google Scholar CrossrefNew millennium learners: initial findings on the effects of digital technologies on school-age learners. (2008). Center for Educational Research and Innovation. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40554230.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefOECD. (2005) E-learning in tertiary education: where do we stand? Paris: OECD/CERI In Schiffman, Stephen, Vignare, Karen & Geith,
Google Scholar CrossrefRISE – International Journal of Sociology of Education, 3(1) 49
Google Scholar CrossrefChristine (Eds.) (2007) Why do higher education institutions pursue online education? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), pp61-71 Retrieved from http://www.sloan- .org/publications/jaln/v11n2/pdf/v11n2_schiffman.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefOlaniyan, D.A., & Okemakinde, T. (2008). Human Capital Theory: Implications for Educational Development. European Journal of Scientific Research. Retrieved from http://www.eurojournals.com/ejsr_24_2_01.pdf.
Google Scholar CrossrefPalfrey, J. &, Gasser, U. (2010). Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Google Scholar CrossrefPascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students. Volume 2: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.
Google Scholar CrossrefPasquier, D. (2008). From parental control to peer pressure: cultural transmission and conformism. In S. Livingstone & K. Drotner (Eds.), International handbook of children, media and culture (pp. 448-459). London: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefRussell, V., & Curtis, W. (2013). Comparing a large- and small-scale online language course: An examination of teacher and learner perceptions. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.07.002
Google Scholar CrossrefSaleh, A. (2011). A closer look at the marriage of for-profit and public higher education institutions. Paper presented at the 13th Annual International Conference on Education, Athens, Greece.
Google Scholar CrossrefSaleh, A. (2012). A Closer look at online graduate degree programs in public institutions. Review of Higher Education and Self-Learning, 5 (16).
Google Scholar CrossrefSandeen, A., & Barr, M. (2006). Critical issues for students affairs: Challenges and opportunities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar CrossrefSchultz, T.W. (1961). Investment in Human Capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1-17.
Google Scholar CrossrefSong, L., Singleton, E.S., Hill, J.R., Koh, M.H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet and Higher Education, 7: 59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.11.003
Google Scholar CrossrefSaleh & Sanders – Online Higher Education
Google Scholar CrossrefStanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effect in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21 (4), 360-407. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
Google Scholar CrossrefWalberg, J. H., & Tsai, S. (1983). Matthew Effect in Education. American Educational Research Journal, 20 (3), 359-373.
Google Scholar CrossrefWalker, C. E., & Kelly, E. (2007). Online instruction: Student satisfaction, kudos, and pet peeves. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(4), 309-319. doi: 10.3102/00028312020003359
Google Scholar CrossrefWilliams, A., Birch, E., & Hancock, P. (2012). The impact of online lecture recordings on student performance. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 28 (2), 199-213.
Google Scholar CrossrefXu, J. & Hampolen-Thompson, G. (2012). Cultural Reproduction, Cultural Mobility, Cultural Resources, or Trivial Effect? A Comparative Approach to Cultural Capital and Educational Performance. Comparative Education Review, 56 (1): 98-124. doi: 10.1086/661289
Google Scholar CrossrefYoung, S. (2006). Student Views of Effective Online Teaching in Higher Education. American Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 65-77. doi: 10.1207/s15389286ajde2002_2
Google Scholar CrossrefYoung, S., Cantrell, P., & Shaw, D. (2001). Online Instruction: New Roles for Teacher and Students. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 5(4), 11- 16.
Google Scholar CrossrefZhang, P. (1998). A Case Study on Technology Use in Distance Learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(1): 398-420.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.