Equal Education
https://doi.org/10.4471/rise.2013.21
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
In educational research literature the role of education as a means for social upward mobility is quite well accepted. However, there are examples where education conserves and perpetuates social class. Each year, after the campus placements, one comes across a familiar situation where some students get selected and some others with equal academic achievements get rejected. This event occurs when one has nearly completed one’s education. The problem that lies at the root of this observation is that students do not enter school/college with equal cultural, social and economic capital. Teachers with their egalitarian values treat them as equals, making no distinctions among them. They ignore the obvious distinctions among students rather than addressing them, thereby, helping preserve these differences. The school teachers ignore, the college teachers ignore and finally the professional teachers also ignore the differences. Consequently, the differential in the cultural and social capital of students continues. To find out whether education preserves or bridges these differences the author studied the impact of annual family income, level of father’s education, level of mother’s education, father’s profession, mother’s profession, area of location of school and the medium of instruction at school on the preparation and performance of students in three different types of engineering colleges. Her sample consisted of 740 students studying in the third year of their 4-year engineering degree course. She compared the performance of students from highest income group with the students from lowest income group, performance of students whose fathers were uneducated with students with professionally educated fathers, students with uneducated mothers and those with professionally educated mothers, students whose fathers were engaged in agriculture with those whose fathers were in profession, students whose mothers were not working and those with mothers in profession, students from rural schools with those from urban schools, and performances of students from English medium schools and students from regional language medium schools through independent sample t-tests and found that though the means of students from high income families, from English medium schools, from schools located in urban areas were higher on all subjects in class ten and class twelve board examinations and higher Semester Grade Point Averages but some differences were not statistically significant. The findings are discussed along with educational implications. The paper is concluded with suggestions for the educators and their renewed responsibilities in the light of findings.
Downloads
References
Bourdieu, P. (1974). The school as a conservative force: scholastic and cultural inequalities. In J. Eggleston (Ed.) Contemporary Research in the Sociology of Education. London Methuen & Co. Ltd.
Google Scholar CrossrefConlon, G. (2005). The determinants of undertaking academic and vocational qualifications in the United Kingdom. Education economics, 13(3), 299313. doi: 10.1080/09645290500073787
Google Scholar CrossrefCreswell, J. W. (2011). Research design qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Third Edition, Sage Publications, London.
Google Scholar CrossrefCreswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003) Advanced mixed methods designs. A Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.) Handbook of mixed methods research in social and behavioral sciences (pp. 209240) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Google Scholar CrossrefCrisp, G., Nora, A., & Taggart, A. (2009). Student characteristics, pre college, college, and environmental factors as predictors of majoring in and earning a STEM degree: An analysis of students attending a Hispanic Serving Institution. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 924942. doi: 10.3102/0002831209349460
Google Scholar CrossrefDenton, A. A. (1998). The role of technical education, training and engineering profession in the wealth creation process. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 212, 337341. doi: 10.1243/0954405981515941.
Google Scholar CrossrefDimova, R., & Markova, V. (2010). Engineering education as a stage for successful professional career. www.iiis.org/CDs2010IMC/ICME_2010/PapersPdf/FB933WX.p df
Google Scholar CrossrefFerguson, G. A., & Takane, Y. (1989). Statistical analysis in Psychology and Education. Sixth Edition, McGrawHill, Singapore.
Google Scholar CrossrefField, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Third Edition, Sage Publications, London
Google Scholar CrossrefGrant, C. D., & Dickson, B. R. (2006). Personal skills in chemical engineering graduates: The development of skills within Degree
Google Scholar CrossrefRISE International Journal of Sociology of Education 2 (1) 65
Google Scholar CrossrefProgrammes to meet the needs of employers. Education for
Google Scholar CrossrefChemical Engineers, 1, 2329. doi: 10.1205/ece05004
Google Scholar CrossrefGuilford, J. P., & Fruchter, B. (1978). Fundamental statistics in Psychology and Education. Sixth Edition, McGrawHill,
Google Scholar CrossrefSingapore.
Google Scholar CrossrefHesseBiber, S. (2010). Emerging methodologies and methods practices
Google Scholar Crossrefin the field of mixed methods research. Qualitative Inquiry,
Google Scholar Crossref(6), 415418. doi: 10.1177/1077800410364611.
Google Scholar CrossrefHesseBiber, S. (2010). Qualitative approach to mixed methods practice. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 455468.doi:
Google Scholar Crossref1177/1077800410364611.
Google Scholar CrossrefJick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24 (4), 602611.
Google Scholar CrossrefLareau, A. (2003). Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Google Scholar CrossrefLe, K. N., and Tam, V. W. Y. (2008). On generic skill development: An engineering perspective. Digital Signal Processing, 18, 355363. doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2007.04.015
Google Scholar CrossrefLent, R. W., Singley, D., Sheu, H., Schmidt, J. A., & Schmidt, L. C. (2007). Relation of socialcognitive factors to academic satisfaction in engineering students. Journal of Career Assessment, 15(1), 8797. doi: 10.1177/1069072706294518.
Google Scholar CrossrefLi, W. (2007). Family background, financial constraints and higher education attendance in China. Economics of Education Review, 26, 725735. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.09.001
Google Scholar CrossrefNASSCOM (National Association of Software and Services Companies) & Mckinsey Report: 75% Indian engineering students unemployable. Published on 9th November 2009.
Google Scholar CrossrefTondeur, J., Sinnaeve, I., van Houtte, M., & van Braak, J. (2011). ICT as cultural capital: The relationship between socioeconomic status and the computer use profile of young people. New Media & Society, 13,151168. doi: 10.1177/1461444810369245.
Google Scholar CrossrefVarma, R., & Kapur, D. (2010). Access, satisfaction, and future: undergraduate education at the Indian Institute of Technology. Higher Education, 59, 703717. doi: 10.1007/s1073400992750
Google Scholar CrossrefMittal, Bhattacharya Equal education
Google Scholar CrossrefWells, R. (2008). The effects of social and cultural capital on student persistence: Are community colleges more meritocratic? Community College Review, 36, 2534.
Google Scholar CrossrefYamamoto, Y., & Brinton, M. C. (2010). Cultural capital in East Asian educational systems: The case of Japan, Sociology of Education, 83,6783. doi: 10.1177/0038040709356567.
Google Scholar CrossrefZhang, G., Anderson, T. J., Ohland, M. W., & Thorndyke, B. R. (2004). Identifying factors influencing engineering student graduation: A longitudinal and crossinstitutional study. Journal of Engineering Education, October 2004, 313320. Retrieved on 1.5.2012 from www.jee.org/2004/october/831.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.