The Growth of E-Marketing in Business-to-Business Industry and its effect on the Performance of Businesses in Pakistan: Marketing Success
https://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2017.2704
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
E-marketing has emerged as one of the significant drivers in sustaining the firms competitive advantage. So far, there is a lack of systematic empirical evidence regarding the marketing activities which are drastically affected by the use of e-marketing in small and large firms of Pakistan and their consequent performance outcomes. However, the objective of this study is to examine the technological, organizational and environmental factors on the performance of small and large firms in Pakistan with mediating role of E-Marketing uses and its generlizibality on countries with similar economic situation. Cross sectional data were collected from 257 manufacturing companies in Pakistan; general manager marketing were selected as the data collection sources. Additionally, SmartPLS 3.0, two step path-modeling has been used to examine the direct as well as indirect hypothesis of the current study. However, the results generated from SmartPLS (SEM) path-modeling found that, with regard to direct relationships, three variables (technology orientation, top management support, use of e-marketing) out of five including mediation variable have found significant positively associated with firm performance, however, only one (competitive pressure) has found negatively significant with firm performance. Finally, in terms of use of e-marketing as mediating variable between the relationships of technological, organizational, environmental factors and firm performance, three out of four (independent variables) indicate partial mediation including technological factors (technology orientation), organizational factors (top management support) and environmental factors (competitive pressure). However, market orientation had shown insignificant results both in the direct relationship as well as by including E-Marketing uses.
Downloads
References
Aaker, D. A., Kumar, V., & Day, G. S. (2001). Marketing Research (7th ed.). John Wiley and Sons New York: New York
Google Scholar CrossrefAhmad, N., & Kalim, R. (2014). Implications of Export Competitiveness, and Performance of Textile and Clothing Sector of Pakistan: Pre and Post Quota Analysis. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 8(3), 696–714.
Google Scholar CrossrefAhmad, S. Z., Bakar, A. R. A., Mohamed, T., Faziharudean, & Zaki, K. A. M. (2014). Information Technology for Development An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting e-Commerce Adoption among Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises in a Developing Country: Evidence from Malaysia. Information Technology For Development, 21(4), 37–41.
Google Scholar CrossrefAllen, D. G., Shore, L. M., & Griffeth, R. W. (2003). The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process. Journal of management, 29(1), 99-118.
Google Scholar CrossrefAl-Qirim, N. (2007). The adoption of eCommerce communications and applications technologies in small businesses in New Zealand. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6(4), 462–473.
Google Scholar CrossrefAmoako-Gyampah, K., & Acquaah, M. (2008). Manufacturing strategy, competitive strategy and firm performance: An empirical study in a developing economy environment. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 575–592.
Google Scholar CrossrefArifin, Z., & Frmanzah. (2015). The Effect of Dynamic Capability to Technology Adoption and its Determinant Factors for Improving Firm’s Performance; Toward a Conceptual Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207(2015), 786–796.
Google Scholar CrossrefBeekhuyzen, J., Hellens, L. von, & Siedle, M. (2005). Cultural barriers in the adoption of emerging technologies. In Proceedings of HCI International.
Google Scholar CrossrefBharadwaj, A. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly.
Google Scholar CrossrefCarpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778.
Google Scholar CrossrefChen, C.-H., & Hsiao, Y.-Y. (2008). the Effect of the Application of Information Technology and Strategic Partnership on the Firm Performance of Logistics Service Providers. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 25(5), 368–378.
Google Scholar CrossrefClemons, E., & Row, M. (1991). Evaluation of strategic investments in information technology. Communications of the ACM, 34(1), 22–36.
Google Scholar CrossrefDas, A., Majumdar, L., Chakrabarti, S., & Chakrabarti, S. (2013). Chemical evolution during the process of proto-star formation by considering a two dimensional hydrodynamic model. New Astronomy, 23, 118–125.
Google Scholar CrossrefDeshpandé, R. (1999). Developing a market orientation. Sage Publications.
Google Scholar CrossrefDeshpandé, R., & Farley, J. U. (2004). Organizational culture, market orientation, innovativeness, and firm performance: an international research odyssey. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(1), 3–22.
Google Scholar CrossrefDjermani, F., Shahzad, A., Sheikh, A. A., Mohammed, J., & Alekam, E. (2016). Factors influencing the intention to use e-government services in algeria: An empirical study. STUDIA UBB NEGOTIA, LXI(3), 35–68.
Google Scholar CrossrefEid, R., & El-Gohary, H. (2013). The impact of E-marketing use on small business enterprises’ marketing success. The Service Industries Journal, 33(1), 31–50.
Google Scholar CrossrefEl Gohary, H. (2012). Factors affecting E-Marketing adoption and implementation in tourism firms: An empirical investigation of Egyptian small tourism organisations. Tourism Management, 33(5), 1256–1269.
Google Scholar CrossrefEl-Gohary, H. (2010). E-Marketing - A Literature Review From A Small Businesses Perspective. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 1(1).
Google Scholar CrossrefFoley, A., & Fahy, J. (2009). Seeing market orientation through a capabilities lens. European Journal of Marketing, 43(1/2, 2009), 13–20.
Google Scholar CrossrefFornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50.
Google Scholar CrossrefFredriksson, T. (2013). E-commerce and Development Key Trends and Issues. In Workshop on E-Commerce, Development and SMEs (pp. 8–9).
Google Scholar CrossrefGao, G., Zhou, K., & Yim, C. (2007). On what should firms focus in transitional economies? A study of the contingent value of strategic orientations in China. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(1), 3–15.
Google Scholar CrossrefGatignon, H., & Xuereb, J. (1997). Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. In Journal of Marketing Research (pp. 77–90).
Google Scholar CrossrefGeorge, D., & Mallery, M. (2003). Using SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference.
Google Scholar CrossrefGrover, V. (1993). An Empirically Derived Model for the Adoption of Customer‐based Interorganizational Systems*. Decision Sciences, 24(3), 603–640.
Google Scholar CrossrefHair Jr, J. F., & Lukas, B. (2014). Marketing research. McGraw-Hill Education Australia.
Google Scholar CrossrefHair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar CrossrefHan, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1998). Market Orientation and Organizational Performance Is Innovation a Missing Link. Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 30–45.
Google Scholar CrossrefHassan, M. ul, Mukhtar, A., Qureshi, S. U., & Sharif, S. (2012). Impact of TQM practices on firm’s performance of Pakistan’s manufacturing organizations. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(10).
Google Scholar CrossrefHayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication monographs, 76(4), 408-420.
Google Scholar CrossrefHenseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing (pp. 277-319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Google Scholar CrossrefHinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of management, 21(5), 967-988.
Google Scholar CrossrefHomburg, C., & Pflesser, C. (2000). A multiple-layer model of market-oriented organizational culture: Measurement issues and performance outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research, 4(2000), 449–462.
Google Scholar CrossrefHong, W., & Zhu, K. (2006). Migrating to internet-based e-commerce : Factors affecting e-commerce adoption and migration at the firm level, 43, 204–221.
Google Scholar CrossrefHooley, G. J., Greenley, G. E., Cadogan, J. W., & Fahy, J. (2005). The performance impact of marketing resources. Journal of Business Research, 58(1), 18-27.
Google Scholar CrossrefHult, G. T. M., Hurley, R. R. F., & Knight, G. A. (2004). Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(5), 429–438.
Google Scholar CrossrefIreland, R., & Webb, J. (2007). A multi-theoretic perspective on trust and power in strategic supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 482–497.
Google Scholar CrossrefJaworski, B., & Kohli, A. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. The Journal of Marketing, 57, 53–70.
Google Scholar CrossrefJohnson, G., Scholes, K., & Fréry, F. (2002). Stratégique, 2e éd.
Google Scholar CrossrefKotler, P., & Keller, K. (2006). Administração de marketing.
Google Scholar CrossrefKyriakopoulos, K., Meulenberg, M., & Nilsson, J. (2004). The impact of cooperative structure and firm culture on market orientation and performance. Agribusiness, 20(4), 379–396.
Google Scholar CrossrefLengnick-Hall, C. (1992). Innovation and competitive advantage: What we know and what we need to learn. Journal of Management, 18(2), 399–429.
Google Scholar CrossrefLi, Y. H. (2008). An empirical investigation on the determinants of E-procurement adoption in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. 2008 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering 15th Annual Conference Proceedings, ICMSE, 32–37.
Google Scholar CrossrefLiang, T.-P., You, J.-J., & Liu, C.-C. (2010). A resource-based perspective on information technology and firm performance: a meta analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(8), 1138–1158.
Google Scholar CrossrefMa, H. (2000). COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE AND FIRM PERFORMANCE. Competitiveness Review, 10(2), 15–32.
Google Scholar CrossrefMackey, A. (2008). The Effect of CEOs on Firm Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1357–1367.
Google Scholar CrossrefMarkides, C. (1997). Strategic innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 38(3), 9. Molla, A., & Licker, P. S. P. (2005). eCommerce adoption in developing countries : a model and instrument. Information & Management, 42(6), 877–899.
Google Scholar CrossrefMombourquette, P. (2008). A study of the nature and extent of Atlantic Canadian small and medium business e-commerce usage leading to the development and testing of a model to explain. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND.
Google Scholar CrossrefMorais, M. (2006). E-business in textile industry. Emarket services (Vol. XXXIII). Retrieved from www.emarketservices.com
Google Scholar CrossrefMosawi, N., Shahzad, A., Golamdin, A. G. B., Pasha, A. T., & Sheikh, A. A. (2016). Thirdparty recognition, perceived product related risk, and perceived ease of use among online consumer trust: The moderating role of internet experience. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 10(2), 239–256.
Google Scholar CrossrefMull, C. (2013). B2B ’ s Digital Evolution. Think With Google, 1–5.
Google Scholar CrossrefNarver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. The Journal of marketing, 20-35.
Google Scholar CrossrefNewbert, S. L. (2008). Value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: A conceptual-level empirical investigation of the resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 745–768.
Google Scholar CrossrefO’Mahony, M., & Ark, B. Van. (2003). EU productivity and competitiveness: an industry perspective: can Europe resume the catching-up process? Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Google Scholar CrossrefOflazoğlu, S., & Koçak, A. (2012). Stratejik Yönlülüklerin Yenilik ve Performans Üzerindeki Etkisi. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1), 121–144.
Google Scholar CrossrefOrtega, M. J. R. (2010). Competitive strategies and firm performance: Technological capabilities’ moderating roles. Journal of Business Research, 63(12), 1273–1281.
Google Scholar CrossrefPakistan, E. S. O. (2015). Overview of the Economy.
Google Scholar CrossrefPerrow, C. (1970). Departmental power and perspectives in industrial firms. Power in Organizations, 7(1970), 58–89.
Google Scholar CrossrefPorter, M. (1985). Competitive strategy: Creating and sustaining superior performance. The free, New York.
Google Scholar CrossrefPorter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of notions. Harvard Business Review.
Google Scholar CrossrefPorter, M. (2008). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.
Google Scholar CrossrefPowell, T. C., & Dent-Micallef, A. (1997). Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal.
Google Scholar CrossrefPreacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers, 36(4), 717-731.
Google Scholar CrossrefPreacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879-891.
Google Scholar CrossrefPremkumar, G. (2003). A meta-analysis of research on information technology implementation in small business. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 13(2), 91–121.
Google Scholar CrossrefPremkumar, G., & Ramamurthy, K. (1995). The Role of Interorganizational and Organizational Factors on the Decision Mode for Adoption of Interorganizational Systems*. Decision Sciences, 26(3), 303–336.
Google Scholar CrossrefPremkumar, G., & Roberts, M. (1999). Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 27, 467–484.
Google Scholar CrossrefPremkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K., & Nilakanta, S. (1994). Implementation of electronic data interchange: an innovation diffusion perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(2), 157-186.
Google Scholar CrossrefRahayu, R., & Day, J. (2015). Determinant Factors of E-commerce Adoption by SMEs in Developing Country: Evidence from Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195(2015), 142–150.
Google Scholar CrossrefRahim, A., Bakar, A. B. U., & Ahmed, Z. U. (2015). Technology Motivation in E-Marketing Adoption among Malaysian Manufacturers. Journal of Transnational Management, 20(April), 126–152.
Google Scholar CrossrefRapp, A., Schillewaert, N., & Hao, A. (2008). The Influence of Market Orientation on E-Business Innovation and Performance: The Role of the Top Management Team. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7–25.
Google Scholar CrossrefRayport, J., & Jaworski, B. (2004). Best face forward. Harvard Business Review, 82(12), 47–59.
Google Scholar CrossrefRiddell, W., & Song, X. (2012). The role of education in technology use and adoption: Evidence from the Canadian workplace and employee survey.
Google Scholar CrossrefRingle, C. M., Wende, S., and Becker, J.-M. 2015. "SmartPLS 3." Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH, http://www.smartpls.com.
Google Scholar CrossrefSaeidi, S. P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S. P., & Saaeidi, S. A. (2014). How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 341–350.
Google Scholar CrossrefSchumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (Vol.55). Transaction publishers.
Google Scholar CrossrefSekaran, U. (2006). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar CrossrefShehu, A. M., & Mahmood, R. (2014). Market orientation and firm performance among nigerian SMEs: The moderating role of business environment. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(23), 158–164.
Google Scholar CrossrefSheikh, A. A., Shahzad, A., & Ishak, A. B. K. (2016). The mediating impact of e-marketing adoption on export performance of firms: A conceptual study. Journal of Technology and Operations Management, 11(1), 48–58.
Google Scholar CrossrefSnyder, K., & Hilal, P. (2015). The changing face of b2b marketing. Think with Google, (March 2015).
Google Scholar CrossrefSolberg, C. A., & Olsson, U. (2010). Management orientation and export performance: the case of Norwegian ICT companies. Baltic Journal of Management, 5(1), 28–50.
Google Scholar CrossrefSrinivasan, R., Lilien, G. L., & Rangaswamy, A. (2002). Technological Opportunism and Radical Technology Adoption: An Application to E-Business. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 47–60.
Google Scholar CrossrefTandon, N., & Reddy, E. E. (2013). a Study on Emerging Trends in Textile Industry in India. AMET International Journal of Management, 81–88(7), 267–276.
Google Scholar CrossrefThompson, V. (1965). Bureaucracy and innovation. In Administrative science quarterly (pp. 1–20).
Google Scholar CrossrefTippins, M., & Sohi, R. (2003). IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic Management Journal, 24(8), 745–761.
Google Scholar CrossrefVarukolu, V. (2007). TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION OF INDIAN GARMENT MANUFACTURING FIRMS (Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The School.
Google Scholar CrossrefVoss, G., & Voss, Z. (2000). Strategic orientation and firm performance in an artistic environment. Journal of Marketing, 64(1), 67–83.
Google Scholar CrossrefWang, Y. M., Wang, Y. S., & Yang, Y. F. (2010). Understanding the determinants of RFID adoption in the manufacturing industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(5), 803–815.
Google Scholar CrossrefWoodward, J., Dawson, S., & Wedderburn, D. (1965). Industrial organization: Theory and practice (Vol. 3). London: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefWu, F., Mahajan, V., & Balasubramanian, S. (2003). An Analysis of E-Business Adoption and its Impact on Business Performance An Analysis of E-Business Adoption and its Impact on Business Performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(April 2003), 425–447.
Google Scholar CrossrefZhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of consumer research, 37(2), 197-206.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.