The Social Nature of Attractiveness: How to Shift Attraction from the Dominant Traditional to Alternative Masculinities

Authors

  • Marcos Castro Universitat de Vic
  • Liviu Catalin Mara Universitat de Barcelona

https://doi.org/10.4471/rimcis.2014.36

Keywords:


Downloads

Abstract

This article explores the paradox that while muchemphasis has been put into educating boys in the alternative masculinities, the boys who hold these values are not the ones who are considered attractive in the social imaginary of a large part of the population. Attractiveness to different masculinity models is the result of the process of socialization. The authors argue that there is a mainstream process of socialization - which is not the only one - that promotes the attraction to the dominant traditional model of masculinities, while the opposite process is found with alternatives ones. Drawing from previous studies in the area of preventive socialization of gender-based violence and men’s studies, different aspects are highlighted showing how transformation is built in regards to provide new alternative models of masculinity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marcos Castro, Universitat de Vic

PhD student, Department of Education

Liviu Catalin Mara, Universitat de Barcelona

Phd student, Sociological Theory Department

References

Allen L (2007) “Sensitive and real macho all at the same time”: Young heterosexual men and romance. Men and Masculinities, 10: 137-152.

Google Scholar Crossref

Aubert A, Melgar P and Valls R (2011) Communicative Daily Life Stories and Focus Groups: Proposals for Overcoming Gender Violence among Teenagers. Qualitative Inquiry, 17 (3):295-303.

Google Scholar Crossref

Beck U and Beck-Gernsheim E (1995) The normal chaos of love. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

Google Scholar Crossref

Brown JA (2002) The Tortures of Mel Gibson: Masochism and the Sexy Male Body. Men and Masculinities 5 (2): 123-143.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bukowski WM, Sippola LK and Newcomb AF (2000) Variations in paterns of attraction o same and other sex peers during ealry adolescence. Developmental Psychology 36 (2): 147-154.

Google Scholar Crossref

Cavender G (1999). Detecting masculinity. In: Ferrell J and Websdale N (eds) Making trouble: Cultural constuctions of crime, deviance and control. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, pp.157-177.

Google Scholar Crossref

Connell, R. (1987). Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Crows Nests: Allen & Unwin.

Google Scholar Crossref

Connell R and Messerschmidt JM (2005) Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept. Gender & Society 19: 829-859.

Google Scholar Crossref

Connell R (2012) Masculinity Research and Global Change. Masculinities and Social Change 1 (1): 4-18.

Google Scholar Crossref

Dasgupta R (2000) Performing masculinties? The “salarayman” at work and play. Japanese Studies 20(2): 189-200.

Google Scholar Crossref

Duque E (2006) Aprendiendo para el amor o para la violència. Las relaciones en las discotecas. [Learning for love or for violence: Relationships in nightclubs]. Barcelona: Hipatia Editorial.

Google Scholar Crossref

Elster J (1989) Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Elster J (1998) Strong Feelings: Emotion, Addiction, and Human Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Elster J (1999) Alchemies of the Mind. Rationality and the emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ferguson H (2001) Men and masculinities in late-modern Ireland. In: Pease B and Pringle K (eds) A man’s world? Changing men’s practices in a globalized world. London: Zed Books, 118-134.

Google Scholar Crossref

Fisher HE (1998) Lust, Attraction, and Attachment in Mammalian Reproduction. Human Nature 9(1): 23-52.

Google Scholar Crossref

Flecha, R., Puigvert, L. & Ríos, O. (2013). The New Alternative Masculinities and the Overcoming of Gender Violence. International and Multidisciplinar Journal of Social Sciences, 2 (1), 88-113,

Google Scholar Crossref

Flood M. (1995) “Three principles for men.” XY:men, sex, politics. Available at: http://www.xyonline.net/content/three-principles-men (accessed 14 November 2012).

Google Scholar Crossref

Fouz-Hernández S (2005) Phallic Matters?: Ewan McGregor and the Represenation of the Male Body in Peter Greenaway’s The Pillow Book (1996). Men and Masculinities 8(2): 133-147.

Google Scholar Crossref

Frederick DA, Buchanan GM, Sadehgi-Azar L, Peplau LA, Haselton MG, Berezovskaya A and Lipinski RE (2007) Desiring the muscular ideal: Men's body satisfaction in the United States, Ukraine, and Ghana. Psychology of Men & Masculinity 8(2): 103-117.

Google Scholar Crossref

Frosh S, Phoenix A and Pattman R (2002) Young masculinities. New York: Palgrave.

Google Scholar Crossref

Giddens A (1992) The transformation of intimacy. Sexuality, love, and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gilmartin SK (2007) Crafting heterosexual masculine identities on campus: College men talk about romantic Love. Men and Masculinities, 9: 530-539.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gómez J (2004). El amor en la Sociedad del riesgo. Una tentativa educativa. [Love in the risk society. An educational approach]. Barcelona: Hipatia editorial.

Google Scholar Crossref

Grammer K and Thornhill R (1994) Human (homo-sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection – the role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology 108(3): 233-242.

Google Scholar Crossref

Grogan S and Richards H (2002) Body Image: Focus Groups with Boys and Men. Men and Masculinities 4(3): 219-232.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gutmann MC (1996) The meanings of macho: Being a man in Mexico City. Berkeley: University of Califormina Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Habermas J (1984a) The theory of communicative action: Volume 1. Reasons and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon.

Google Scholar Crossref

Habermas J (1984b) The theory of communicative action: Volume 2. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston: Beacon.

Google Scholar Crossref

Haiken E (2000) Virtual Virility, or, Does Medicine Make the Man? Men and Masculinities 2(4): 388-409.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hargreaves DA and Tiggemann M (2009) Muscular ideal media images and men's body image: Social comparison processing and individual vulnerability. Psychology of Men & Masculinity 10(2): 109-119.

Google Scholar Crossref

Higate P (2003) Military masculinitiees: Identitite and the State London: Praeger.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hobza CL and Rochlen AB (2009) Gender role conflict, drive for muscularity, and the impact of ideal media portrayals on men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity 10(2): 120-130.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hobza CL, Walker KE, Yakushko O and Peugh JL (2007) What about men? Social comparison and the effects of media images on body and self-esteem. Psychology of Men & Masculinity 8(3): 161-172.

Google Scholar Crossref

hooks B (2000) Feminism is for everybody. Cambridge, MA: South End.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ishii-Kuntz M (2003) Balancing fatherhood and work: Emergence of diverse masculinities in contemporary Japan. In: Roberson JE and Suzuki N (eds) Men and masculinities in contemporary Japan. London: Routledge Courzon, 198-216.

Google Scholar Crossref

Jackson S (1993) Even Sociologists Fall in Love: An Exploration in the Sociology of Emotions. Sociology 27(2): 201-220.

Google Scholar Crossref

Johnston VS, Hagel R, Franklin M, Fink B and Grammer K (2001) Male facial attractiveness- Evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior 22(4) 251-267.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kimmel M. (1997). Integrating Men into the Curriculum. Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy 4: 181-195.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kimmel, M., Hearn, J., Connell, R. (2005). Handbook of Studies on Men and Masculinities. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications.

Google Scholar Crossref

Langford W (1996) Romantic love and power. In: Cosslett T, Easton A and Summerfield P (eds) Women, power and resistance: An introduction to women’s studies. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 23-34.

Google Scholar Crossref

Law R, Campbell H and Dolan J (1999) Masculinities in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Palmerston North. New Zealand: Dunmore Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Luhmann N (1986) Love as Passion: The Codification of Intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Martín N and Tellado I (2012) Violencia de Género y Resolución Comunitaria de Conflictos en los Centros Educativos. [Gender Violence and Community Resolution of

Google Scholar Crossref

Conflicts in the Educational Centres] Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies 1(3): 300-319.

Google Scholar Crossref

McArdle KA and Hill MS (2009) Understanding Body Dissatisfaction in Gay and Heterosexual Men: The Roles of Self-Esteem, Media and Peer Influence. Men and Masculinities 11(5): 511-532.

Google Scholar Crossref

McDaniel AK (2005) Young Women's Dating Behavior: Why/Why Not Date a Nice Guy? Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 53(5-6): 347-359.

Google Scholar Crossref

McDonald KA (1998) Defining the nature of attraction. The Chronicle of Higher Education 44(2): 14-15.

Google Scholar Crossref

Mead GH (1934) Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Meuser M (2003) Modernized masculinities? Continuities, challenges and changes in men’s lives. In: Ervo S and Johansson T (eds) Among men: Moulding masculinities. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate,127-148.

Google Scholar Crossref

Morrell R (1998) Of boys and men: Masculinity and gender in Southern African studies. Journal of Southern African Studies 24(4): 605-630.

Google Scholar Crossref

Morris C and Evans N (2001) “Cheese makers are always women”: Gendered representations of farm life in the agricultural press. Gender, Place and Culture 8(4): 375-390.

Google Scholar Crossref

Morrison TG, Morrison MA, Hopkins C and Rowan ET (2004) Muscle Mania: Development of a New Scale Examining the Drive for Muscularity in Canadian Males. Psychology of Men & Masculinity 5(1): 30-39.

Google Scholar Crossref

New C (2001) Oppressed and Oppressors? The systematic Mistreatment of Men Sociology 35:729-748.

Google Scholar Crossref

Nikkelen SWC, Anschutz DJ, Thao H and Engels RC (2011) Influence of visual attention on male body dissatisfaction after idealized media exposure. Psychology of Men & Masculinity 13(3): 308-323.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ortega y Gasset J (1999) Estudios sobre el amor. [Studies about love.] Barcelona: Óptima.

Google Scholar Crossref

Padrós M (2007) Models d’atracció dels i les adolescents. Contribucions des de la socialització preventiva de la violència de gènere. [Attractiveness models of teenagers. Contributions from the preventive socialization of gender violence]. Study funded by the Catalan Institute of Women.

Google Scholar Crossref

Padrós M (2012) Modelos de atractivo masculinos en la adolescencia. [Attractiveness male models in adolescence]. Masculinities and Social Change 1(2): 165-183.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pearce Land Stacey J (1995) Romance revisited. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pillsworth EG and Haselton MG (2006) Male sexual attractiveness predicts differential ovulatory shifts in female extra-pair attraction and male mate retention. Evolution and Human Behavior 27(4): 247-258.

Google Scholar Crossref

Puigvert L and Muñoz B (2012) Estudios de género. Barreras y aportaciones al debate teórico internacional desde las voces de las otras mujeres. [Gender Studies. Barriers and Contributions to the Theoretical International Debate on the Voices of the Other Women]. Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies 1(1): 4-27.

Google Scholar Crossref

Rebellon CJ and Manasse M (2004) Do “bad boys” really get the girls? Delinquency as a cause and consequence of dating behavior among adolescents. Justice Quarterly 21: 355-389.

Google Scholar Crossref

Redman P (1996) Curtis loves Ranjit: Heterosexual masculinities, schooling and challenge of pupils’ sexual culture. Educational Review 48(2): 175-182.

Google Scholar Crossref

Redman P (2001) The discipline of love: Negotiation and regulation in boy’s performance of a romance-based heterosexual masculinity. Men and Masculinities 2(4): 186-200.

Google Scholar Crossref

Salecl R (1998) (Per)versions of love and hate. London: Verso.

Google Scholar Crossref

Savulescu J and Sandberg A (2008) Neuroenhancement of Love and Marriage: The Chemicals Between Us. Neuroethics 1:31-44.

Google Scholar Crossref

Serradell, O.; Santa Cruz. I.; & Mondéjar, E. (2014). Can the men’s movement attract young men? The Men in Dialogue Association. Journal of Gender Studies, Online first.

Google Scholar Crossref

Speer SA (2005) Gender talk: Feminism, discourse, and conversation analysis. London: Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Sternberg RJ (1998) Love is a story. New York: Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Taga F (2003) Rethinking male socialization: Life histories of Japanese male youth. In: Louie K and Low M (eds) Asian masculinities. London: Routledge Curzon, 137-154.

Google Scholar Crossref

Talbot K and Quayle M (2010) The Perils of Being a Nice Guy: Contextual Variation in Five Young Women’s Constructions of Acceptable Hegemonic and Alternative Masculinities. Men and Masculinities 13(2): 255-278.

Google Scholar Crossref

Valdés T and Olavarría J (1998) Ser hombre en Santiago de Chile: A pesar de todo, un mísero modelo. [Being a man in Santiago de Chile, in spite of it all, a poor model]. In: Valdés T and Olavarría J (eds) Masculinidades y equidad de género en América Latina. [Masculinities and gender equity in Latin America.] Santiago de Chile: FALCSO/UNFPA, 12-35.

Google Scholar Crossref

Valls R, Puigvert L and Duque E (2008) Gender Violence amongst teenagers: socialization and prevention. Violence against Women 14 (7):759-785.

Google Scholar Crossref

Warren S (1997) Who do these boys think they are? An investigation into the construction of masculinities in a primary classroom. International Journal of Inclusive Education 1(2): 207-222.

Google Scholar Crossref

Whitchurch ER, Wilson TD and Gilbert DT (2011) “He Loves Me, He Loves Me Not…”: Uncertainty Can Increase Romantic Attraction. Psychological Science 22(2): 172-175.

Google Scholar Crossref

Worth H, Paris A and Allen L (2002) The life of Brian: Kiwi masculinities, sexualities and health. Dunedin, New Zealand: Otago University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Downloads

Published

2014-07-30

Almetric

Dimensions

How to Cite

Castro, M., & Mara, L. C. (2014). The Social Nature of Attractiveness: How to Shift Attraction from the Dominant Traditional to Alternative Masculinities. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 182–206. https://doi.org/10.4471/rimcis.2014.36

Issue

Section

Articles