Member Reactions to Social Loafers When Doing Group-Based Assignments: A Group Processes Perspective

Authors

  • Joseph Reginard Milinga Mkwawa University College of Education, A Constituent College of the University of Dar es Salaam
  • Ezelina Angetile Kibonde Mkwawa University College of Education, A Constituent College of the University of Dar es Salaam
  • Venance Paul Mallya Mkwawa University College of Education, A Constituent College of the University of Dar es Salaam
  • Monica Asagwile Mwakifuna Mkwawa University College of Education, A Constituent College of the University of Dar es Salaam

https://doi.org/10.17583/remie.2019.3836

Keywords:


Downloads

Abstract

Understanding how student teachers undertake their group work may provide solid foundation for developing essential skills required for the 21st Century teachers, and subsequently help improve group-based assessment in higher education. However, social loafing has been found to interfere with this assessment mode. This article reports on undergraduate student teachers’ reactions to social loafers when working on group assignments as part of their continuous assessment. It focuses on how they go about doing their group work and react to the social loafers. The data were collected using face-to-face semi-structured interviews from 18 purposefully and conveniently selected participants. The findings have indicated procedures that students observe in doing their group assignments such as formulation of own group norms and rules, and holding of meetings for the work being determined by the nature of the assignments, and their submission deadlines. Additionally, it has been found that group members employ humanitarian, punitive and threatening approaches as they react to social loafers. The article concludes that proper planning for students’ group assignments is important and; both instructors and students should play their roles accordingly to overcome the problem of social loafing when the use of group-based assessments is indispensable within higher education contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Joseph Reginard Milinga, Mkwawa University College of Education, A Constituent College of the University of Dar es Salaam

Currently, Mr. Milinga is an Assistant Lecturer in Educational Psychology

Ezelina Angetile Kibonde, Mkwawa University College of Education, A Constituent College of the University of Dar es Salaam

Ms. Kibonde is an Assistant Lecturer in Curriculum and Teachinging.

Venance Paul Mallya, Mkwawa University College of Education, A Constituent College of the University of Dar es Salaam

Mr. Venance is an Assistant Lecturer in Curriculum and Teachinging.

Monica Asagwile Mwakifuna, Mkwawa University College of Education, A Constituent College of the University of Dar es Salaam

Ms. Monica is an Assistant Lecturer in Science and Mathematics Education.

References

Aggarwal, P., & O’Brien, C. L. (2008). Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, 30(3), 255-64. doi: 10.1177/0273475308322283

Google Scholar Crossref

Alfares, N. (2017). Benefits and difficulties of learning in group work in EFL classes in Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching, 10(7), 247-256. doi: 10.5539/elt.v10n7p247

Google Scholar Crossref

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Canada: Wadsworth CENGAGE Learning.

Google Scholar Crossref

Barfield, R. L. (2003). Students’ perceptions of and satisfaction with group grades and the group experience in the college classroom. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(4), 355-370. doi: 10.1080/0260293032000066191

Google Scholar Crossref

Baron, R. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2012). Social psychology (13th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bassey, M. (1981). Pedagogic research: On the relative merits of search for generalisation and study of single events. Oxford Review of Education, 7(1), 73-94.

Google Scholar Crossref

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol13/iss4/2.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bonebright, D. A. (2009). 40 years of storming: A historical review of Tuckman’s model of small group development. Human Resource Development International, 13(1), 111-120.

Google Scholar Crossref

Boren, A. E., & Morales, S. (2018). Celebrities and slackers: A grounded theory of the dynamics of social loafing on student teams. Journal of Leadership Education, 42-59. doi:10.12806/V17/I2/R3

Google Scholar Crossref

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bravo, R., Catalán, S., & Pina, J. M. (2018). Analysing teamwork in higher education: An empirical study on the antecedents and consequences of team cohesiveness. Studies in Higher Education, 1-13. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2017.1420049.

Google Scholar Crossref

Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2000). Making a difference: Using peers to assess individual students’ contributions to a group project. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(2), 243-255. doi: 10.1080/135625100114885

Google Scholar Crossref

Cohen, L. M., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007) (6th ed.). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. doi: 10.1177/0149206305279602

Google Scholar Crossref

Curşeu, P. L., & Pluut, H. (2013). Student groups as learning entities: The effect of group diversity and teamwork quality on groups’ cognitive complexity. Studies in Higher Education, 38(1), 87-103. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.565122

Google Scholar Crossref

Daly, A., Hoy, S., Hughes, M., Islam, J., & Mak, A. S. (2015). Using group work to develop intercultural skills in the accounting curriculum in Australia. Accounting Education, 24(1), 27-40. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2014.996909

Google Scholar Crossref

Davies, W. M. (2009). Group work as a form of assessment: Common problems and recommended solutions. Higher Education, 58(4), 563-584. doi: 10.1007/s10734-009-9216-y

Google Scholar Crossref

Decuyper, S., Dochy, F., & van den Bossche, P. (2010). Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organisations. Educational Research Review, 5, 111-133. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X10000217

Google Scholar Crossref

Frykedal, K. F., & Chiriac, E. H. (2011). Assessment of students’ learning when working in groups. Educational Research, 53(3), 331-345. doi: 10.1080/00131881.2011.598661

Google Scholar Crossref

Gaur, S. B., & Gupta, T. (2013). Is group assessment a bane or boon in higher education? A students-teacher perspective. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 6(3), 141-148. doi: 10.1080/17543266.2013.795610

Google Scholar Crossref

Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st century skills: What are they and how do we assess them? Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 245-249. doi: 10.1080/08957347.2016.1209207

Google Scholar Crossref

Goo, A. B. (2011). Team-based learning and social loafing in higher education. University of Tennessee Honors Thesis Projects. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.855.170&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gordon, J., Halsz, G., Krawczyk, M., Leney, T., Michel, A., Pepper, D., Wisniewski, W. (2009). Key competences in Europe: Opening doors for lifelong learners across the school curriculum and teacher education: Warsaw, Center for Social and Economic Research on behalf of CASE Network. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/education/more-information/moreinformation139_en.htm.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gupta, A., H. Li, & Sharda, R. (2013). Should I send this message? Understanding the impact of interruptions, social hierarchy and perceived task complexity on user performance and perceived workload. Decision Support Systems, 55, 135-45. Retrived from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167923613000055?via%3Dihub

Google Scholar Crossref

Hall, D., & Buzwell, S. (2012). The problem of free riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 37-49. doi: 10.1177/1469787412467123

Google Scholar Crossref

Hassanien, A. (2006). Student experience of group work and group assessment in higher education. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 6(1), 17-39. doi: 10.1300/J172v06n01_02

Google Scholar Crossref

Horowitz, I. A., & Bordens, K. S. (1995). Social psychology. California: Mayfield.

Google Scholar Crossref

Jassawalla, A. R., Malshe, A., & Sashittal, H. (2008). Student perceptions of social loafing in undergraduate business classroom teams. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(2), 403-426. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2008.00183.x

Google Scholar Crossref

Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C., & Terry, L. (2013). What knowledge is of most worth? Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(4), 127-140. doi: 10.1080/21532974.2013.10784716

Google Scholar Crossref

Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.). Handbook of psychology, 12: Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 333-375. NY: Wiley.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kuisma, R. (2007). Portfolio assessment of an undergraduate group project. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(5), 557-69. doi: 10.1080/02602930601116904

Google Scholar Crossref

Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., Struyven, K., & Cascallar, E. (2011). The perception of workload and task complexity and its influence on students’ approaches to learning: A study in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26(3), 393-415. doi: 10.1007/s10212-010-0053-2

Google Scholar Crossref

LaBeouf, J. P., Griffith, J. C., & Roberts, D. L. (2016). Faculty and student issues with group work: What is problematic with college group assignments and why? Journal of Education and Human Development, 5(1), 13-23. doi: 10.15640/jehd.v5n1a2

Google Scholar Crossref

Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822-832. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822

Google Scholar Crossref

Li, M., & Campbell, J. (2008). Asian students’ perceptions of group work and group assignments in a New Zealand tertiary institution. Intercultural Education, 19(3), 203-216. doi: 10.1080/14675980802078525

Google Scholar Crossref

Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Jaworski, R. A., & Bennett, N. (2004). Social loafing: A field investigation. Journal of Management, 30(2), 285-304. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2003.02.002

Google Scholar Crossref

Livingstone, D., & Lynch, K. (2000). Group project work and student-centred active learning: Two different experiences. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 325-345. doi: 10.1080/713696161

Google Scholar Crossref

Maiden, B., & Perry, B. (2011). Dealing with free‐riders in assessed group work: Results from a study at a UK university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(4), 451-464. doi: 10.1080/02602930903429302

Google Scholar Crossref

Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410-476. doi: 10.1177/0149206308316061

Google Scholar Crossref

Mbalamula, Y. S. (2018). Effect of group versus individual assessments on coursework among undergraduates in Tanzania: Implications for continuous assessments in universities. Pedagogical Research, 3(1), 02, 2-8. doi: 10.20897/pr/85171

Google Scholar Crossref

Mishra, P., & Mehta, R. (2017). What we educators get wrong about 21st-century learning: Results of a survey. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(1), 6-19. doi: 10.1080/21532974.2016.1242392

Google Scholar Crossref

Morgan, B. M. (2004). Cooperative Learning in higher education: Hispanic and Non-Hispanic undergraduates’ reflections on group grades. Journal of Latinos and Education, 3(1), 39-52. doi: 10.1207/s1532771xjle0301_4

Google Scholar Crossref

Njie, B., Asimiran, S., & Basri, R. (2013). An exploratory study of the free riding debacle in a Malaysian University: Students’ perspectives. Asia-Pacific Edu Res, 22(3), 257-262. doi: 10.1007/s40299-012-0029-x

Google Scholar Crossref

North, A. C., Linley, P. A., & Hargreaves, D. J. (2000). Social loafing in a co-operative classroom task. Educational Psychology, 20(4), 389-392. doi: 10.1080/01443410020016635

Google Scholar Crossref

Opdecam, E., & Everaert, P. (2018). Seven disagreements about cooperative learning. Accounting Education, 27(3), 223-233. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2018.1477056

Google Scholar Crossref

Persons, D. S., & Calabro, P. B. (2013). Group processes in the foreign language classroom. Retrieved from http://www.educ.su.ac.th/2013/images/stories/reserch/55-56/15.pdf

Google Scholar Crossref

Petty, G. (2009). Teaching today: A practical guide (4th ed.).UK: Nelson Thornes.

Google Scholar Crossref

Piezon, S. I., & Donaldson, R. I. (2005). Online groups and social loafing: Understanding student-group interactions. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(4), 1-11. Retrieved from https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter84/piezon84.htm

Google Scholar Crossref

Pfaff, E., & P. Huddleston. (2003). Does it matter if I hate teamwork? What impacts student attitudes toward teamwork. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(1), 37-45. doi: 10.1177/0273475302250571

Google Scholar Crossref

Pieterse, V., & Thompson, L. (2010). Academic alignment to reduce the presence of ‘social loafers’ and ‘diligent isolates’ in student teams. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(4), 355-367. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2010.493346

Google Scholar Crossref

Refeque, M., Balakrishnan, K., Inan, N. K., & Harji, M. B. (2018). An empirical analysis of student’s perception towards group work: A Middle East perspective. Educational Research, 9(2), 035-041.

Google Scholar Crossref

Revere, L., Elden, M. E., & Bartsch, R. A. (2008). Designing group examinations to decrease social loafing and increase learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 1-16. doi: 10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020117

Google Scholar Crossref

Sharp, S. (2006). Deriving individual student marks from a tutor’s assessment of group mark. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 329-43. doi: 10.1080/02602930500352956

Google Scholar Crossref

Sohn, B. K., Thomas, S. P., Greenberg, K. H., & Pollio, H. R. (2017). Hearing the voices of students and teachers: A phenomenological approach to educational research. Qualitative Research in Education, 6(2), 121-148. doi: 10.17583/qre.2017.2374

Google Scholar Crossref

Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S., & Gielen, S. (2006). On the dynamics of students’ approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16(4), 279-94. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.001

Google Scholar Crossref

Swaray, R. (2012). An evaluation of a group project designed to reduce free riding and promote active learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(3), 285-292. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2010.531246

Google Scholar Crossref

Synnott, C. K. (2016). Guides to reducing social loafing in group projects: Faculty development. Journal of Higher Education Management, 31(1), 211-221. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2010.531246

Google Scholar Crossref

Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100. doi: 10.1177/2345678906292430

Google Scholar Crossref

Webb, N. M. (1995). Group collaboration in assessment: Multiple objectives, processes, and outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(2), 239-261. doi.org/10.3102/01623737017002239

Google Scholar Crossref

Wilmot, W., & Hocker, J. (2011). Interpersonal conflict (8th ed.). NY: McGrawHill.

Google Scholar Crossref

Wolff, S. B., Druskat, V. U., Koman, E. S., & Messer, T. E. (2006). The link between group emotional competence and group effectiveness. In V. U. Druskat, G. Mount, & F. Sala (Eds.). Linking emotional intelligence and performance at work: Current research evidence with individuals and groups, 223-242. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Google Scholar Crossref

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Google Scholar Crossref

Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 9, 1-6. Retrieved from http://psyking.net/htmlobj-3837/case_study_as_a_research_method.pdf

Google Scholar Crossref

Zastrow, C. H. (2009). Social work with groups: A comprehensive workbook (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.

Google Scholar Crossref

Downloads

Published

2019-02-14

Almetric

Dimensions

How to Cite

Milinga, J. R., Kibonde, E. A., Mallya, V. P., & Mwakifuna, M. A. (2019). Member Reactions to Social Loafers When Doing Group-Based Assignments: A Group Processes Perspective. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 25–56. https://doi.org/10.17583/remie.2019.3836

Issue

Section

Articles