The Roles of University Researchers in a University-School Collaborative Action Research Project - A Chinese experience

Authors

  • Qiang Wang Beijing Normal University
  • Hongjia Mu China University of Mining & Technology

https://doi.org/10.4471/remie.2013.08

Keywords:


Downloads

Abstract

Teacher research as an international movement since the 1970s has been advocated worldwide to promote school curriculum reform and the professionalization of school teachers. University-school collaborative action research is a new attempt to support school teachers who learn to do research in their classrooms while providing opportunities for university researcher to develop a better understanding of classroom practice with more effective strategies to support teacher change. Such collaborative research has been promoted in the recent curriculum reform in basic education in China. This paper reports on an action research project conducted by school teachers supported by university researchers in the Chinese context with a focus on examining the roles and gains of university researchers in this project. Data was collected through project meeting observations, questionnaires, interviews and participants’ reflective journals. Both quantitative and qualitative analysis methods were used respectively for analyzing the data collected. The purpose of this study is to understand better the nature of such collaborations and the gains as well as challenges on the part of university researchers so that implications can be drawn for establishing a sound university-school collaborative research body that promotes the professional learning of both parties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Biott, C. & Nias, J. (1 992). Working and learning together for change. Buckingham, Open University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Catelli, L. A., Padovano, K., & Costello, J. (2000). Action research in the context of school-university partnership: Its value, problems, issues, and benefit. Educational Action Research, 8 (2), 225-242. doi: 10.1080/09650790000200119.

Google Scholar Crossref

Chen, X. (2000). Qualitative research in social science. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House.

Google Scholar Crossref

Clark, R. W. (1988). School-university relationships: An interpretive review. In Sirotnik. K. A. & Goodlad, J. I. (Eds.), School- university Partnerships in Action: Concepts, cases, and concerns (pp. 32-65). New York: Teachers College Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Day, C. (1 998). Re-thinking school-university partnerships: A Swedish case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(8), 807-819.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kemmis, S. & R. McTaggart. (1988). The action research planner. Waurn Ponds,Vic:Dakin University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kersh, M. E. & Masztal, N. B. (1998). An analysis ofstudies of collaboration between universities and K-12 schools. Educational Forum, 62, 218-225. doi: 10.1080/00131729808984347.

Google Scholar Crossref

Lisa, S. (1984). Collaborative action research: Historical trends. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Orleans, LA.

Google Scholar Crossref

Lu, N. & Cao, T. (2003). Legislators and interpreters: Changes in the roles of experts in the process of school-university collaboration. Fudan Education Forum, 1 (1), 18-21.

Google Scholar Crossref

REMIE - Multidisciplinary Journal ofEducational Research, 3 (2) 127

Google Scholar Crossref

McNiff, J. (2002). Action research for professional development: Concise advice for new action researchers. Retrieved from http://www.actionresearch.net/.

Google Scholar Crossref

Palmer, P. J. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape ofa teacher's life. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Google Scholar Crossref

Somekh, B. (1994). Inhabiting each other’s castles: Towards knowledge and mutual growth through collaboration. Educational Action Research, 2 (3), 357–81. doi: 10.1080/0965079940020305.

Google Scholar Crossref

Stenhouse, L. (1979). What is action research CARE. University ofEast Anglia, Norwich.

Google Scholar Crossref

Townsend, A. & Day, C. (2007). Ethical issues for consultants in complex collaborative action research settings. In Groundwater- Smith, S. & Campbell, A. (Eds.), An Ethical Approach to Practitioner Research (pp.42-62). Oxon: Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Wagner, J. (1 997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering researcher-practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26, 13-22. doi: 10.3102/0013189X026007013.

Google Scholar Crossref

Wang, Q. (2002). Action research for English teachers. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Wang, Q., Zhang, W., & Lin, Z. (2010). A practical exploration into the collaborative action research between universities and basic education teachers. Curriculum, Material and Method, 30(1 2), 87- 93.

Google Scholar Crossref

Downloads

Published

2013-06-15

Almetric

Dimensions

How to Cite

Wang, Q., & Mu, H. (2013). The Roles of University Researchers in a University-School Collaborative Action Research Project - A Chinese experience. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 3(2), 101–129. https://doi.org/10.4471/remie.2013.08

Issue

Section

Articles