Reconsidering Education for Sustainable Society: An East Asian Perspective

Authors

  • Kyung Hi Kim Kyungnam University
  • Shinil Kim Seoul National University

https://doi.org/10.4471/remie.2013.01

Keywords:


Downloads

Abstract

The authors propose an ecology-centered paradigm pursuing a harmonious relationship between mankind and the natural world and all of its living beings is a solution that enables man and nature to survive together. The realization of a way of living and social institutions that promote the co-prosperity of man and nature will require significant changes in Education. Accordingly, the will to achieve the goal should be equally strong. They argue that first change needed is in the mind-set and our behavior. Therefore, we need to change the direction of education first. Efforts should be made to break away from the education of the industrial era. The paradigm of education should be shifted from nature-exploitative education to new one, namely ‘nature-friendly education’. Most countries have used school education as a tool for economic growth, and consequently school education was mobilized in conquering and exploiting nature. Now the direction of school education should be reset toward nature-friendly education. In this attempt to shifting paradigm in education, Confucius’ ren-motivated education and learning proffers a satisfactory perspective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chan, W. T. (1970). (Trans. & Comp.) A source book in Chinese philosophy. Princeton University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Cheng, C. Y. (2000). Confucian onto-hermeneutics: morality and ontology. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 27(1), 33-68.

Google Scholar Crossref

Doren, Charles Van. (1995). A History of Knowledge (Korean translation). Seoul: Koryomunhwasa.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gier, N. F. (2001). The dancing ru: A Confucian aesthetics of virtue. Philosophy of East and West, 51(2), 280-305.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hsu, H. Y. (2000). Confucius and act-centered morality. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 27(3), 331-344.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hutchins, R. (1968). The Learning Society. New York: A Mentor Book.

Google Scholar Crossref

Joseph, C., Mahaffie, J. and Hines, A. 1997. 2025 Scenarios of US and Global Society Reshaped by Science and Technology. Greensboro: Oakhill Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kim, H. P. (2006). Confucius’s aesthetic concept of noble man: beyond moralism. Asian Philosophy, 16(2), 111-121.

Google Scholar Crossref

Li, C. (2007). Li as cultural grammar: on the relation between li and ren in Confucius’ Analects. Philosophy of East and West, 57(3), 311-329.

Google Scholar Crossref

Lenk, H. and Gregor, P. (1993). Epistemological Issues in Classical Chinese Philosophy. State University of New York Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Morton, W. S. (1995). China: Its History and Culture. McGraw-Hill.

Google Scholar Crossref

New York Times. 2008. Years Later, Climatologist Renews His Call for Action. June 23.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ng, A. K. (2001). Why Asians Are Less Creative Than Westerners. London: Prentice-Hall.

Google Scholar Crossref

Nisbett, R. (2005). Geography of Thought. London: Nicholas Brealy.

Google Scholar Crossref

Park, W. H. and Others. 2002. Vision of Environment 2050 of Korea (in Korean). Gumulko Publisher.

Google Scholar Crossref

Park, Y. S., Glenn, J., and Godden, T. (2009). UN Millennium Project: The State of Future. United Nations.

Google Scholar Crossref

Tan, S. H. (1999). Experience as art. Asian Philosophy. 9(2), 107-122.

Google Scholar Crossref

UNEP GEO Data Portal

Google Scholar Crossref

Downloads

Published

2013-02-15

Almetric

Dimensions

How to Cite

Hi Kim, K., & Kim, S. (2013). Reconsidering Education for Sustainable Society: An East Asian Perspective. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4471/remie.2013.01

Issue

Section

Articles