Member Reactions to Social Loafers When Doing Group-Based Assignments: A Group Processes Perspective
Keywords:group assignment, higher education, member reactions, social loafing, social exchange theory
Understanding how student teachers undertake their group work may provide solid foundation for developing essential skills required for the 21st Century teachers, and subsequently help improve group-based assessment in higher education. However, social loafing has been found to interfere with this assessment mode. This article reports on undergraduate student teachers’ reactions to social loafers when working on group assignments as part of their continuous assessment. It focuses on how they go about doing their group work and react to the social loafers. The data were collected using face-to-face semi-structured interviews from 18 purposefully and conveniently selected participants. The findings have indicated procedures that students observe in doing their group assignments such as formulation of own group norms and rules, and holding of meetings for the work being determined by the nature of the assignments, and their submission deadlines. Additionally, it has been found that group members employ humanitarian, punitive and threatening approaches as they react to social loafers. The article concludes that proper planning for students’ group assignments is important and; both instructors and students should play their roles accordingly to overcome the problem of social loafing when the use of group-based assessments is indispensable within higher education contexts.
Aggarwal, P., & O’Brien, C. L. (2008). Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, 30(3), 255-64. doi: 10.1177/0273475308322283
Alfares, N. (2017). Benefits and difficulties of learning in group work in EFL classes in Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching, 10(7), 247-256. doi: 10.5539/elt.v10n7p247
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Canada: Wadsworth CENGAGE Learning.
Barfield, R. L. (2003). Students’ perceptions of and satisfaction with group grades and the group experience in the college classroom. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(4), 355-370. doi: 10.1080/0260293032000066191
Baron, R. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2012). Social psychology (13th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
Bassey, M. (1981). Pedagogic research: On the relative merits of search for generalisation and study of single events. Oxford Review of Education, 7(1), 73-94.
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol13/iss4/2.
Bonebright, D. A. (2009). 40 years of storming: A historical review of Tuckman’s model of small group development. Human Resource Development International, 13(1), 111-120.
Boren, A. E., & Morales, S. (2018). Celebrities and slackers: A grounded theory of the dynamics of social loafing on student teams. Journal of Leadership Education, 42-59. doi:10.12806/V17/I2/R3
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Bravo, R., Catalán, S., & Pina, J. M. (2018). Analysing teamwork in higher education: An empirical study on the antecedents and consequences of team cohesiveness. Studies in Higher Education, 1-13. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2017.1420049.
Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2000). Making a difference: Using peers to assess individual students’ contributions to a group project. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(2), 243-255. doi: 10.1080/135625100114885
Cohen, L. M., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007) (6th ed.). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. doi: 10.1177/0149206305279602
Curşeu, P. L., & Pluut, H. (2013). Student groups as learning entities: The effect of group diversity and teamwork quality on groups’ cognitive complexity. Studies in Higher Education, 38(1), 87-103. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.565122
Daly, A., Hoy, S., Hughes, M., Islam, J., & Mak, A. S. (2015). Using group work to develop intercultural skills in the accounting curriculum in Australia. Accounting Education, 24(1), 27-40. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2014.996909
Davies, W. M. (2009). Group work as a form of assessment: Common problems and recommended solutions. Higher Education, 58(4), 563-584. doi: 10.1007/s10734-009-9216-y
Decuyper, S., Dochy, F., & van den Bossche, P. (2010). Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organisations. Educational Research Review, 5, 111-133. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X10000217
Frykedal, K. F., & Chiriac, E. H. (2011). Assessment of students’ learning when working in groups. Educational Research, 53(3), 331-345. doi: 10.1080/00131881.2011.598661
Gaur, S. B., & Gupta, T. (2013). Is group assessment a bane or boon in higher education? A students-teacher perspective. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 6(3), 141-148. doi: 10.1080/17543266.2013.795610
Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st century skills: What are they and how do we assess them? Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 245-249. doi: 10.1080/08957347.2016.1209207
Goo, A. B. (2011). Team-based learning and social loafing in higher education. University of Tennessee Honors Thesis Projects. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.855.170&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Gordon, J., Halsz, G., Krawczyk, M., Leney, T., Michel, A., Pepper, D., Wisniewski, W. (2009). Key competences in Europe: Opening doors for lifelong learners across the school curriculum and teacher education: Warsaw, Center for Social and Economic Research on behalf of CASE Network. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/education/more-information/moreinformation139_en.htm.
Gupta, A., H. Li, & Sharda, R. (2013). Should I send this message? Understanding the impact of interruptions, social hierarchy and perceived task complexity on user performance and perceived workload. Decision Support Systems, 55, 135-45. Retrived from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167923613000055?via%3Dihub
Hall, D., & Buzwell, S. (2012). The problem of free riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 37-49. doi: 10.1177/1469787412467123
Hassanien, A. (2006). Student experience of group work and group assessment in higher education. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 6(1), 17-39. doi: 10.1300/J172v06n01_02
Horowitz, I. A., & Bordens, K. S. (1995). Social psychology. California: Mayfield.
Jassawalla, A. R., Malshe, A., & Sashittal, H. (2008). Student perceptions of social loafing in undergraduate business classroom teams. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(2), 403-426. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2008.00183.x
Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C., & Terry, L. (2013). What knowledge is of most worth? Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(4), 127-140. doi: 10.1080/21532974.2013.10784716
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.). Handbook of psychology, 12: Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 333-375. NY: Wiley.
Kuisma, R. (2007). Portfolio assessment of an undergraduate group project. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(5), 557-69. doi: 10.1080/02602930601116904
Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., Struyven, K., & Cascallar, E. (2011). The perception of workload and task complexity and its influence on students’ approaches to learning: A study in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26(3), 393-415. doi: 10.1007/s10212-010-0053-2
LaBeouf, J. P., Griffith, J. C., & Roberts, D. L. (2016). Faculty and student issues with group work: What is problematic with college group assignments and why? Journal of Education and Human Development, 5(1), 13-23. doi: 10.15640/jehd.v5n1a2
Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822-832. doi: 10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.112
Li, M., & Campbell, J. (2008). Asian students’ perceptions of group work and group assignments in a New Zealand tertiary institution. Intercultural Education, 19(3), 203-216. doi: 10.1080/14675980802078525
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Jaworski, R. A., & Bennett, N. (2004). Social loafing: A field investigation. Journal of Management, 30(2), 285-304. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2003.02.002
Livingstone, D., & Lynch, K. (2000). Group project work and student-centred active learning: Two different experiences. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 325-345. doi: 10.1080/713696161
Maiden, B., & Perry, B. (2011). Dealing with free‐riders in assessed group work: Results from a study at a UK university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(4), 451-464. doi: 10.1080/02602930903429302
Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410-476. doi: 10.1177/0149206308316061
Mbalamula, Y. S. (2018). Effect of group versus individual assessments on coursework among undergraduates in Tanzania: Implications for continuous assessments in universities. Pedagogical Research, 3(1), 02, 2-8. doi: 10.20897/pr/85171
Mishra, P., & Mehta, R. (2017). What we educators get wrong about 21st-century learning: Results of a survey. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(1), 6-19. doi: 10.1080/21532974.2016.1242392
Morgan, B. M. (2004). Cooperative Learning in higher education: Hispanic and Non-Hispanic undergraduates’ reflections on group grades. Journal of Latinos and Education, 3(1), 39-52. doi: 10.1207/s1532771xjle0301_4
Njie, B., Asimiran, S., & Basri, R. (2013). An exploratory study of the free riding debacle in a Malaysian University: Students’ perspectives. Asia-Pacific Edu Res, 22(3), 257-262. doi: 10.1007/s40299-012-0029-x
North, A. C., Linley, P. A., & Hargreaves, D. J. (2000). Social loafing in a co-operative classroom task. Educational Psychology, 20(4), 389-392. doi: 10.1080/01443410020016635
Opdecam, E., & Everaert, P. (2018). Seven disagreements about cooperative learning. Accounting Education, 27(3), 223-233. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2018.1477056
Persons, D. S., & Calabro, P. B. (2013). Group processes in the foreign language classroom. Retrieved from http://www.educ.su.ac.th/2013/images/stories/reserch/55-56/15.pdf
Petty, G. (2009). Teaching today: A practical guide (4th ed.).UK: Nelson Thornes.
Piezon, S. I., & Donaldson, R. I. (2005). Online groups and social loafing: Understanding student-group interactions. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(4), 1-11. Retrieved from https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter84/piezon84.htm
Pfaff, E., & P. Huddleston. (2003). Does it matter if I hate teamwork? What impacts student attitudes toward teamwork. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(1), 37-45. doi: 10.1177/0273475302250571
Pieterse, V., & Thompson, L. (2010). Academic alignment to reduce the presence of ‘social loafers’ and ‘diligent isolates’ in student teams. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(4), 355-367. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2010.493346
Refeque, M., Balakrishnan, K., Inan, N. K., & Harji, M. B. (2018). An empirical analysis of student’s perception towards group work: A Middle East perspective. Educational Research, 9(2), 035-041.
Revere, L., Elden, M. E., & Bartsch, R. A. (2008). Designing group examinations to decrease social loafing and increase learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 1-16. doi: 10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020117
Sharp, S. (2006). Deriving individual student marks from a tutor’s assessment of group mark. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 329-43. doi: 10.1080/02602930500352956
Sohn, B. K., Thomas, S. P., Greenberg, K. H., & Pollio, H. R. (2017). Hearing the voices of students and teachers: A phenomenological approach to educational research. Qualitative Research in Education, 6(2), 121-148. doi: 10.17583/qre.2017.2374
Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S., & Gielen, S. (2006). On the dynamics of students’ approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16(4), 279-94. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.001
Swaray, R. (2012). An evaluation of a group project designed to reduce free riding and promote active learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(3), 285-292. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2010.531246
Synnott, C. K. (2016). Guides to reducing social loafing in group projects: Faculty development. Journal of Higher Education Management, 31(1), 211-221. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2010.531246
Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100. doi: 10.1177/2345678906292430
Webb, N. M. (1995). Group collaboration in assessment: Multiple objectives, processes, and outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(2), 239-261. doi.org/10.3102/01623737017002239
Wilmot, W., & Hocker, J. (2011). Interpersonal conflict (8th ed.). NY: McGrawHill.
Wolff, S. B., Druskat, V. U., Koman, E. S., & Messer, T. E. (2006). The link between group emotional competence and group effectiveness. In V. U. Druskat, G. Mount, & F. Sala (Eds.). Linking emotional intelligence and performance at work: Current research evidence with individuals and groups, 223-242. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 9, 1-6. Retrieved from http://psyking.net/htmlobj-3837/case_study_as_a_research_method.pdf
Zastrow, C. H. (2009). Social work with groups: A comprehensive workbook (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
How to Cite
The opinions and contents of the manuscript published in REMIE are under exclusive responsibility of the author(s). Therefore, authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permission for reproducing the material published in other publications".
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.