Mapping Educational Pathways through Focus Groups: Children and Young People on the Impact of Inclusive Socio-Educational Practices
Keywords:
Type:
TextAbstract
As school became a primary instance of socialization and acculturation, and school education expanded across practically every country in the world, and reached virtually all children/young people, during an increasingly longer period of the life cycle, school failure and dropout emerged as cross-cutting educational and sociopolitical issues. Nonetheless, the voices of the actors engaging in initiatives aimed at overcoming school failure and dropout are seldom heard. Project EDUPLACES (PTDC/MHC-CED/3775/2014) proposed to do just that, through interviews, questionnaires and focus groups with parents/families, children/young people, teachers/other staff and community representatives. This paper explores the outcomes of eight focus groups involving a total of 57 children/young people, with a particular emphasis on the discourses emanating from the participants in Mediation and Study Support practices. As we discuss how initiatives aimed at overcoming school failure and dropout address issues such as inclusion, participation, learning, empowerment and community development, focus groups emerge as a relevant tool for navigating the meaning(s) of educational success.
Downloads
References
Antunes, F. & Lúcio, J. (2019). Overcoming Barriers: The Local and the Innovative Dimensions of Inclusive Socio-Educational Practices. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 120–143. https://doi.org/10.17583/remie.2019.4200
Google Scholar CrossrefAntunes, F. (2019) (Org.). Remar Contra as Desigualdades em Educação: Práticas, vozes, percursos. Edições Húmus.
Google Scholar CrossrefBaker, R. & Hilton, R. (1999). Do focus groups facilitate meaningful participation in social research? In R. S. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice (pp. 79-98). Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefBalbín, M. A. D. (2016). Comunidades de aprendizaje como modelo de atención a la diversidad. Libro de actas CIMIE16 de AMIE (licenciado bajo Creative Commons 4.0 International License). http://amieedu.org/actascimie16/
Google Scholar CrossrefBarros, R. & Barrientos-Rastrojo, J. (2014). Reflexões Epistemológicas sobre o Potencial Emancipador da Pedagogia da Libertação e do Pensamento Crítico para Superar o Modelo Escolar no Que fazer do(a) Professor(a). Educação em Revista, 30(3), 1-29.
Google Scholar CrossrefBernstein, B. (1996). A Estruturação do Discurso Pedagógico. Classe, códigos e controle. Vozes.
Google Scholar CrossrefBogdan, R. & Biklen, S. (1994). Investigação Qualitativa em Educação. Porto Editora.
Google Scholar CrossrefBourdieu, P. & Passeron, J.-C. (1970). A Reprodução. Vega.
Google Scholar CrossrefCanário, R. (2006). A Escola tem Futuro? Das promessas às incertezas. Artmed.
Google Scholar CrossrefCosta, I., Loureiro, A., Silva, S. M. & Araújo, H. C. (2013). Perspectives of Portuguese municipal education officers on school disengagement. Educação, Sociedade & Culturas, 40, 165-185.
Google Scholar CrossrefDale, R. (2010). Early school leaving. Lessons from research for policy makers. http://www.nesse.fr/nesse/activities/reports.
Google Scholar CrossrefDe Witte, K., Cabus, S., Thyssen, G., Groot, W. & Van den Brink, H. (2013). A critical review of the literatures on school dropout. Educational Research Review, 10, 13-28.
Google Scholar CrossrefDemazière, D. (2010). A Mediação Social, um Trabalho de Terreno. In J. A. Correia & A. M. Silva (Orgs.), Mediação: (D)Os contextos e (d)os actores. (pp. 103-117). CIIE & Edições Afrontamento.
Google Scholar CrossrefDireção-Geral de Estatísticas da Educação e Ciência [DGEEC] (2019). Perfil do aluno 2017/2018. https://www.poch.portugal2020.pt
Google Scholar CrossrefEdwards, A. & Downes, P. (2013). Alliances for inclusion. Cross-sector policy synergies and interprofessional collaboration in around schools. http://www.nesetweb.eu/resource-library
Google Scholar CrossrefEkstrom, R. B. (1972). Barriers to Women's Participation in Post-Secondary Education. A Review of the Literature. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED072368
Google Scholar CrossrefEuropean Centre for the Development of Vocational Training [CEDEFOP] (2008). Terminology of European education and training policy. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. https://doi.org/10.2801/15877
Google Scholar CrossrefFerguson, B., Tilleczek, K., Boydell, K. & Rummens, J. A. (2005) Early school leavers: understanding the lived reality of student disengagement from secondary school. Final Report. Community Health Systems Resource Group of the Hospital for Sick Children for the Ontario Ministry of Education and Training. Special Education Branch.
Google Scholar CrossrefFlecha, R. (Ed.) (2015), Successful Educational Actions for Inclusion and Social Cohesion in Europe. Springer.
Google Scholar CrossrefFrandji, D., Pincemin, J-M., Demeuse, M., Gregor, D. & Rocher, J-Y. (2009). "EuroPEP" comparaison des politiques d’Éducation prioritaire en Europe. Papper scientifique, Vol. 2, Eléments d’une analyse transversale: formes de ciblage, action, évaluation. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/267047/1/Europep+volume++final+2
Google Scholar CrossrefFrey, J. H. & Fontana, A. (1993). The group interview in social research. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 20-34). Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefGraffigna, G. & Bosio, A. C. (2006). The influences of settings on findings produced in qualitative health research: A comparison between face-to-face and on-line discussion groups about HIV/AIDS. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), 55-76.
Google Scholar CrossrefHyde, A., Howlett, E., Brady, D. & Drennen, J. (2005). The focus group method: Insights from focus group interviews on sexual health with adolescents. Social Science and Medicine, 61, 2588–2599.
Google Scholar CrossrefJahnukainen, M. (2001). Social exclusion and dropping out of education. In J. Visser, H. Daniels & T. Cole (Eds.), Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties in Mainstream Schools (International Perspectives on Inclusive Education, Vol. 1) (pp. 1-12). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3636(01)80003-9
Google Scholar CrossrefKitzinger, J. & Barbour, R. (1999). Introduction: The challenge and promise of focus groups. In R. S. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice (pp. 4–19). Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefKitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness, 16(1), 103–121.
Google Scholar CrossrefKrueger, R. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied researchers. Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefLewin, C. & Somekh, B. (2015). Teoria e métodos de pesquisa social. Editora Vozes Limitada.
Google Scholar CrossrefLúcio, J. & Antunes, F. (2021). It Takes a Village to Overcome School Failure and Dropout: Innovative Educational Practices Promoting Children’s Educational Rights in Portugal. In J. Gillett-Swan & N. Thelander (Eds.), Children’s Rights from International Educational Perspectives. Wicked problems for children’s education rights (pp. 85-98). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80861-7_7
Google Scholar CrossrefLúcio, J. & Neves, T. (2010). Mediation in Local Educational Governance: The Educating Cities movement in a Portuguese town. European Educational Research Journal, 9(4), 484-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2010.9.4.484
Google Scholar CrossrefMertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage publications.
Google Scholar CrossrefMerton, R. K., Fiske, M. & Kendall, P. L. (1990). The focused interview: A manual of problems and procedures. Free Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefMoloney, S. (2011). Focus groups as transformative spiritual encounters. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(1), 58-72.
Google Scholar CrossrefMorgan, D. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefMorgan, M., Gibbs, S., Maxwell, K. & Britten, N. (2002). Hearing children’s voices: Methodological issues in conducting focus groups with children aged 7–11 years. Qualitative Research, 2(5), 5–20.
Google Scholar CrossrefMorin, E. (2001). Ciência com consciência: edição revista e modificada pelo autor (trad. Maria D. Alexandre & Maria Alice Sampaio Dória) (5.ª ed.). Bertrand Brasil.
Google Scholar CrossrefNóvoa, A. (2006). Debate Nacional sobre Educação. Assembleia da República, 22 de Maio de 2006. http://repositorio.ul.pt/bitstream/10451/688/1/21181_AR_ca.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefPerrenoud, P. (1995). Ofício de aluno e sentido do trabalho escolar. Porto Editora.
Google Scholar CrossrefPsacharopoulos, G. (2007), The Costs of School Failure - A Feasibility Study. European Expert Network on Economics of Education. http://www.education-economics.org/de/dms/EENEE/Analytical_Reports/EENEE_AR2.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefRaby, R. (2010). Public selves, inequality, and interruptions: The creation of meaning in focus groups with teens. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9(1), 1-15.
Google Scholar CrossrefRaffo, C., Dyson, A. & Keer, K. (2014). Lessons from area-based initiatives in education and training. University of Manchester.
Google Scholar CrossrefRochex, J-Y. (2011). As três idades das políticas de educação prioritária: Uma convergência europeia?. Educação e Pesquisa, 37, 871-882.
Google Scholar CrossrefRodrigues, R., Amorim, J. P. & Neves, T. (2022). “The holiness of minute particulars”: can the community compensate for the schools’ shortfalls in affection?. Pastoral Care in Education, 40(1), 40-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2020.1855672
Google Scholar CrossrefRoss, A. (2009). Educational Policies that address school innequality. Overall report. http://www.epasi.eu
Google Scholar CrossrefRumberger, R. W. (2001). Why Students Drop Out of School and What Can Be Done. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/58p2c3wp.
Google Scholar CrossrefRumberger, R. W. (2004). Why students drop out of school. In G. Orfield (Ed.), Dropouts in America: Confronting the graduation rate crisis (pp. 131-155). Harvard Education Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefSchwerin, E. W. (1995). Mediation, Citizen Empowerment, and Transformational Politics. Praeger.
Google Scholar CrossrefSilva, P. (2010). Análise sociológica da relação escola-família: um roteiro sobre o caso português. Sociologia, 20, 443-464.
Google Scholar CrossrefSociedade Portuguesa de Ciências da Educação [SPCE] (2020). Carta Ética. http://www.spce.org.pt/assets/files/CARTA-TICA2.EDICAOFINAL-2020-COMPACTADO.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefTempleton, J. F. (1994). The focus group: A strategic guide to organizing, conducting, and analyzing the focus group interview (Revised Edition). McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar CrossrefTorremorell, M. C. (2008). Cultura de Mediação e Mudança Social. Porto Editora.
Google Scholar CrossrefTuckman, B. W. (2000). Manual de Investigação em Educação. Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
Google Scholar CrossrefUnited Nations (2015). A/RES/70/1 - Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
Google Scholar CrossrefUniversity of Barcelona/CREA & University of Minho/UEA (2006). Responses to Challenges of Youth Training in the Knowledge Society. Case Studies of Promising Practice. University of Barcelona/Centre of Research in Theories and Practices that Overcome Inequalities.
Google Scholar CrossrefWaterton, C. & Wynne, B. (1999). Can focus groups access community views? In R. S. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice (pp. 127-143). Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefWilkinson, S. (1999). How useful are focus groups as feminist research? In R. S. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice (pp. 64– 78). Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefYoung, M. F. D. (1982). Uma abordagem ao estudo dos programas enquanto fenómenos do conhecimento socialmente organizado. In S. Grácio & S. R. Stoer (Orgs.), Sociologia da Educação II – A construção social das práticas educativas (pp. 150-187). Livros Horizonte.
Google Scholar CrossrefPublished
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Joana Lúcio, Raquel Rodrigues, Marta de Oliveira Rodrigues
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
