How the Responsibility of Digital Support for Older People is Allocated? The Swedish Welfare System at the Crossroads

Authors

  • Sofia Alexopoulou PhD researcher
  • Joachiim Åström

https://doi.org/10.17583/rasp.8883

Downloads

Abstract

A great welfare challenge today is to promote opportunities of digitalization while limiting social inequalities from digital divides, especially for older people. While the digital divide is a dynamic problem, shifting from physical access to skills and usage, public policies to close the divide do not necessary follow. This study explores who is providing digital support in Sweden by looking at three institutions: (1) the municipal eldercare system, (2) popular education institutions, and (3) the family. The results show that the Swedish policy rely heavily on popular education and family arrangements, leaving many young-old Swedes in need of digital support without public support, while the opposite occurs for very old Swedes who are mostly consumers of welfare technologies. Issues of dependency/independency arise. Given this, the role to the Swedish welfare state needs to be re-evaluated, especially in light of rapid demographic change.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agre, P. E. (2002). Real-time politics: The Internet and the political process. The Information Society, 18(5). https://doi.org/311-331. 10.1080/01972240290075174

Google Scholar Crossref

Alexopoulou, S. (2020). Borrowed access: The grey digital divide meets the familialist welfare model of Greece. The Journal of Aging and Social Change, 10(1), 15-33. https://doi.org/10.18848/2576-5310/CGP/v10i01/15-33.

Google Scholar Crossref

Barber, B. R. (2001). The uncertainty of digital politics: Democracy’s uneasy relationship with information technology. Harvard International Review, 23(1), 42-47. www.jstor.org/stable/42762661.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to Plan and Perform a Qualitative Study Using Content Analysis. Nursing Plus Open, 2, 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001.

Google Scholar Crossref

Blomberg, S., Edebalk, P. G., & Petersson, J. (2000). The withdrawal of the welfare state: Elderly care in Sweden in the 1990s. European Journal of Social Work, 3(2), 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/714052821.

Google Scholar Crossref

Blomqvist, P. (2004). The choice revolution: Privatization of Swedish welfare services in the 1990s. Social Policy and Administration, 38(2), 139–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2004.00382.x.

Google Scholar Crossref

Brodin, H. (2005). Does Anybody Care? Public and Private Responsibilities in Swedish Eldercare 1940–2000. Ekonomisk historiska institutionen, Umeå universitet.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bustillos, J. (2017). The Digital Divide. Neoliberal Imperatives and Education. In S. Isaacs, (Eds), European Social Problems. London and New York: Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Calhoun, C. (1995). Critical Social Theory: Culture, History and the Challenge of Difference. Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell.

Google Scholar Crossref

Carruthers, D. (2001). Environmental politics in Chile: Legacies of dictatorship and democracy. Third World Quarterly, 22(3), 343-358. www.jstor.org/stable/3993468.

Google Scholar Crossref

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Google Scholar Crossref

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Google Scholar Crossref

Dahlquist, O., L. (2019). Folkbildning för delaktighet: En studie om bibliotekets demokratiska uppdrag i en digital samtid. Lunds Universitet.

Google Scholar Crossref

Davidsson P., Palm M. & Mandre ÅM. (2018). Svenskarna och internet 2018. Retrieved October 8, 2021 from https://internetstiftelsen.se/docs/Svenskarna_och_internet_2018.pdf

Google Scholar Crossref

Digidel (2013). Ökad digital delaktighet. Stockholm: Digidel.

Google Scholar Crossref

Dye, T. R. (1972). Understanding Public Policy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Google Scholar Crossref

Eichhorst, W. & Rinne, U. (2017). Digital Challenges for the Welfare State. IZA Policy Paper, No. 134. Bonn: Institute of Labor Economics

Google Scholar Crossref

Emanuel, M. (2009). Folkbildning kring datorn 1978-85. Transkript av ett vittnesseminarium vid Tekniska museet i Stockholm den 9 oktober 2008. Stockholm: Kungliga tekniska högskolan.

Google Scholar Crossref

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Fang, M.L., Canham, S.L., Battersby, L., Sixsmith, J., Wada, M., & Sixsmith, A. (2019). Exploring Privilege in the Digital Divide: Implications for Theory, Policy, and Practice. The Gerontologist, 59, e1–e15. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny037.

Google Scholar Crossref

Fischl, C., Lindelöf, N., Lindgren, H., & Nilsson, I. (2020). Older adults’ perceptions of contexts surrounding their social participation in a digitalized society—an exploration in rural communities in Northern Sweden. European Journal of Ageing, 81–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-020-00558-7.

Google Scholar Crossref

Folkbildningsrådet (2019a). Årsredovisning och verksamhetsberättelse. Stockholm: Folkbildningsrådet.

Google Scholar Crossref

Folkbildningsrådet (2019b). Digitalisering inom folkbildningen. Hur ser det ut idag och vilka utmaningar finns framöver? Stockholm: Folkbildningsrådet.

Google Scholar Crossref

Folkbildningsrådet (2018). Årsredovisning och verksamhetsberättelse. Stockholm: Folkbildningsrådet.

Google Scholar Crossref

Folkbildningsrådet (2017). Årsredovisning och verksamhetsberättelse. Stockholm: Folkbildningsrådet.

Google Scholar Crossref

Folkbildningsrådet (2015). Digital delaktighet och flexibelt lärande i folkbildningen 2014. Stockholm: Folkbildningsrådet.

Google Scholar Crossref

Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Google Scholar Crossref

Frennert, S. & Baudin, K. (2019). The concept of welfare technology in Swedish municipal eldercare. Disability and Rehabilitation, 43(9), 1220-1227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1661035.

Google Scholar Crossref

Government Offices of Sweden (2017). För ett hållbart digitaliserat Sverige – en digitaliseringsstrategi. Stockholm: Government Offices of Sweden.

Google Scholar Crossref

Government Offices of Sweden (2016) Vision for eHealth 2026 – Common Starting Points for Digitization of Social Services and Health Care. Stockholm: Government Offices of Sweden.

Google Scholar Crossref

Grassman, E. J. (2014). The question of civil society in a Scandinavian Welfare State: Focusing on older people in Sweden. Senri Ethnological Studies, 87, 151–160. https://doi.org/10.15021/00002391.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hall, P. (2008). Throwing discourses in the garbage can: The case of Swedish ICT policy. Critical Policy Analysis, 2(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2008.9518530.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hansen, H.-T., Lundberg, K., & Syltevik, L. J. (2018). Digitalization, street-level bureaucracy and welfare users’ experiences. Social Policy & Administration, 52(1), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12283.

Google Scholar Crossref

Helbig, N., Gil-Garcia, R. J., & Ferro, E. (2009). Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 89−97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.05.004.

Google Scholar Crossref

Helsper, E. J. & Reisdorf, B. C. (2017). The emergence of a “digital underclass” in Great Britain and Sweden: Changing reasons for digital exclusion. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1253-1270, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816634676.

Google Scholar Crossref

Helsper, E. J. & van Deursen, A. J. A. M. (2017). Do the rich get digitally richer? Quantity and quality of support for digital engagement. Information, Communication & Society, 20 (5), 700–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1203454.

Google Scholar Crossref

IT-kommissionen (2002). IT och äldre. IT-kommissionens rapport 2/2002.

Google Scholar Crossref

Jensen, P. H. & Andrea, P. (2014). Introduction: Enhancing volunteering in later life in Europe. In A. Principi, P. H. Jensen, & G. Lamura (Eds.), Active Ageing: Voluntary Work by Older People in Europe. University Press Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447307204.003.0001.

Google Scholar Crossref

Katz, S. (2000). Busy bodies: Activity, aging, and the management of everyday life. Journal of Aging Studies, 14(2), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-4065(00)80008-0.

Google Scholar Crossref

Katzin, M. (2014). Tillbaka till familjen: privat och offentligt ansvar i den svenska äldreomsorgen. Retfærd: Nordisk juridisk tidsskrift, 2, 37-53.

Google Scholar Crossref

Länsstyrelserna (2019). Bevakning av grundläggande betaltjänster 2019. Rapport 2019:10.

Google Scholar Crossref

Larsson, S. (1999). Studiecirkeldemokratin. I Amnå, Erik (ed) Civilsamhället. SOU 1999: 84. Demokratiutredningens forskarvolym VIII.

Google Scholar Crossref

Löfgren, K. & Sørensen, E. (2011). Metagoverning policy networks in e-government. In V. Weerakkody (Eds.), Applied Technology Integration in Governmental Organizations: New E-Government Research (pp. 298–312). IGI Global, Hershey.

Google Scholar Crossref

Lupton, D. (2013). The digitally engaged patient: Self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Social Theory & Health, 11(3), 256-270. https://doi.org/10.1057/STH.2013.10.

Google Scholar Crossref

Marking, C. (2010). Insatser för Digital Delaktighet. Stockholm: Internetstiftelsen.se.

Google Scholar Crossref

Mölndals kommun (2020). Digitalt stöd i hemmet. Ny serviceinsats från 1 januari 2020. Mölndal: Mölndals kommun.

Google Scholar Crossref

Montin, S. (2015). Between hierarchy, market and networks: The case of public service and care for the elderly in Sweden. Paper presented at the International Conference on Public Policy. Milan: Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore.

Google Scholar Crossref

Montin, S. (2017). The politics and management of eldercare in flux: The case of Sweden. Paper presented at COST Action Loc, Ref, 9-10 of Mars.

Google Scholar Crossref

Morse, M. J. (2008). Confusing Categories and Themes. Qualitative Health Research 18(6), 727–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308314930.

Google Scholar Crossref

Motel-Klingebiel, A., Tesch-Römer, C., & von Kondratowitz, H.-J. (2005). Welfare states do not crowd out the family: Evidence for mixed responsibility from comparative analyses. Ageing & Society, 25(6), 863-882. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X05003971.

Google Scholar Crossref

National Board of Health and Welfare (2020a). E-hälsa och välfärdsteknik i kommunerna 2020. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare.

Google Scholar Crossref

National Board of Health and Welfare (2020b). Vård och omsorg om äldre. Lägesrapport 2020. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ney, S. (2005). Active aging policy in Europe: Between path dependency and path departure. Ageing International, 30, 325–342. https://doi.org/110.1007/s12126-005-1019-6.

Google Scholar Crossref

Norberg, I. (2017). Insatser för digital kompetens på folkbiblioteken: En studie om Folkbildningsfolkbibliotekens arbete med digital delaktighet. Stockholm: Digidel.

Google Scholar Crossref

Nordens välfärdscenter (2020). Att åldras i Norden - En kartläggning av strategier och initiativ för aktivt och hälsosamt åldrande i de nordiska länderna. Stockholm: Nordens välfärdscenter.

Google Scholar Crossref

Nordqvist, C. & Wihlborg, E. (2019). Digitalt först? Kommuners och professionellas arbete för ökad digital inkludering. DINO Rapport 2019:2. Linköping: Linköpings universitet.

Google Scholar Crossref

Norris, P. (2001). Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Post-och telestyrelsen (2017). Grundläggande betaltjänster i en digitaliserad framtid,.PTS-ER-2017:20.Stockholm: Post-och telestyrelsen,

Google Scholar Crossref

Powell, W. W. & Di Maggio, P. J. (Eds.) (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Regeringskansliet (2017/18:47). Hur Sverige blir bäst i världen på att använda digitaliseringens möjligheter - en skrivelse om politikens inriktning. Stockholm.

Google Scholar Crossref

Reneland-Forsman, L. (2018). ‘Borrowed access’ – the struggle of older persons for digital participation. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 37(3), 333-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2018.1473516.

Google Scholar Crossref

Scheerder, A., van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes: A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1607-1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007.

Google Scholar Crossref

Schou, J. (2018). Remaking Citizenship: Welfare Reform and Public Sector Digitalization. ITU-DS No. 151.IT-Universitetet i København.

Google Scholar Crossref

Siren, A. & Knudsen, S. G. (2017). Older adults and emerging digital service delivery: A mixed methods study on information and communications technology use, skills, and attitudes. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 29(1), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2016.1187036.

Google Scholar Crossref

Sobis, I. (2014). Comparison of Public and Private Home Care Services for Elderly in Gothenburg Region, Sweden 2013. Central European Public Administration Review, 11(3-4), 25-55. https://doi.org/10.17573/ipar.2013.3-4.a02

Google Scholar Crossref

SOU (2020:14). Framtidens teknik i omsorgens tjänst.

Google Scholar Crossref

SOU (2014:13). En digital agenda i människans tjänst – en ljusnande framtid kan bli vår. Delbetänkande Digitaliseringskommissionen.

Google Scholar Crossref

SPF Seniorerna (2019). Digitalisering handlar om människor. Stockholm: SPF Seniorerna.

Google Scholar Crossref

Statskontoret (2018). En folkbildning i tiden – en utvärdering utifrån syftena med statsbidraget. Slutrapport. Stockholm: Statskontoret.

Google Scholar Crossref

Sundström, G., Johansson, L., & Hassing, L. B. (2002). The shifting balance of long-term care in Sweden. Gerontologist, 42 (3), 350-355. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/42.3.350.

Google Scholar Crossref

Svensk biblioteksförening (2018). Digital delaktighet en kärnuppgift för biblioteken. www.biblioteksföreningen.se.

Google Scholar Crossref

Sveriges kommuner och landsting (2017). Förutsättningar för digital utveckling i kommuner, landsting och regioner. Handlingsplan 2017-2025. Stockholm: Sveriges kommuner och landsting.

Google Scholar Crossref

Szebehely, M. & Trydegård, G. B. (2007). Omsorgstjänster för äldre och funktionshindrade: skilda villkor, skilda trender? Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 14, 197-219. https://doi.org/10.3384/SVT.2007.14.2-3.2589.

Google Scholar Crossref

Szebehely, M. & Trydegård, G.-B. (2012). Home care for older people in Sweden: A universal model in transition. Health and Social Care in the Community, 20(3), 300-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01046.x.

Google Scholar Crossref

Szebehely, M. & Ulmanen, P. (2008). Vård av anhöriga – ett högt pris för kvinnor. Välfärd: SCB:s tidskrift om arbetsliv, demografi och välfärd, 2, 12-14.

Google Scholar Crossref

The Ministry of Health and Social Affairs (2018). Framtidens äldreomsorg – en nationell kvalitetsplan. Skr. 2017/18:280.

Google Scholar Crossref

The Swedish Internet Foundation (2020). Svenskarna och Internet 2020. Stockholm: The Swedish Internet Foundation.

Google Scholar Crossref

The Swedish Internet Foundation (2018). Svenskarna och Internet 2018. Stockholm: The Swedish Internet Foundation.

Google Scholar Crossref

The Swedish Internet Foundation (2014). Svenskarna och Internet 2014. Stockholm: The Swedish Internet Foundation.

Google Scholar Crossref

Torfing, J. (2009). Rethinking path dependence in public policy research. Critical Policy Studies, 3(1), 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460170903158149.

Google Scholar Crossref

van Deursen, A. J. A. M. & Helsper, E. J. (2015). The third-level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online? In L. Robinson, S. R. Cotten, J. Schulz, T. M. Hale, & A. Williams (Eds.), Communication & Information Technologies Annual: Studies in Media & Communications (pp. 29-52). Bingley: Emerald Insight.

Google Scholar Crossref

Van Dijk, J. (2020). The Digital Divide. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Wei, K.-K., Teo, H.-H., Chan, H. C., & Tan, B. C. (2011). Conceptualizing and testing a social cognitive model of the digital divide. Information Systems Research, 22(1), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0273.

Google Scholar Crossref

Yang, K. (2003). Neoinstitutionalism and e-government: Beyond Jane Fountain. Social Science Computer Review, 21(4), 432-442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439303256508.

Google Scholar Crossref

Yin, R. K. (1981). The case study crisis: Some answers. Administrative Science. Quarterly, 26(1), 58-65. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392599.

Google Scholar Crossref

Yin, R. K. (1998). The abridged version of case study research: Design and method. In L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods (pp. 229–259). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Google Scholar Crossref

Downloads

Published

2022-01-30

Almetric

Dimensions

How to Cite

Alexopoulou, S., & Åström, J. . (2022). How the Responsibility of Digital Support for Older People is Allocated? The Swedish Welfare System at the Crossroads . Research on Ageing and Social Policy, 10(1), 48–76. https://doi.org/10.17583/rasp.8883

Issue

Section

Articles