“I think I'm better at it myself”: the Capability Approach and Being Independent in Later Life.

Authors

https://doi.org/10.17583/rasp.2019.3678

Downloads

Abstract

Current policies on ageing in the global north emphasize that ‘ageing well’ is an individual responsibility, and tend to undervalue the social, economic and cultural context of ageing. The capability approach is well-suited to address the interplay between context and individual in later life. In this article, we therefore use the capability approach to explore how individual capabilities and contextual opportunities and restrictions contribute to being independent in later life. A qualitative methodology was adopted and we conducted in-depth interviews with 32 adults aged 65 and older, who lived independently and in sheltered housing. The study was carried out in two urban neighborhoods in the North of the Netherlands. Our findings underline that different pathways to independence are shaped by individual resources and capabilities, as well as by social and physical characteristics of the living environment. The three key capabilities that lead to being independent that we found were 1) to be comfortable at home and in the neighborhood; 2) to enjoy fulfilling social relations, and 3) to be mobile. The generated insights could be linked to policy initiatives with regard to age-friendly environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Louise Meijering, University of Groningen

Faculty of Spatial Sciences, Population Research Center, Urban and Regional Studies Institute

Assistant Professor

Bettina van Hoven, University of Groningen

Faculty of Spatial Sciences, Department of Cultural Geography, Urban and Regional Studies Institute

Associate Professor

References

Antczak, R. & Zaidi, A. (2018). Well-Being of older Persons in Central and Eastern European countries. Research on Ageing and Social Policy, 6(1), 26-52. doi: 10.4471/rasp.2018.3109.

Google Scholar Crossref

Berg, P. van den, Sharmeen, F. & Weijs-Perrée, M. (2017). On the subjective quality of social Interactions: Influence of neighborhood walkability, social cohesion and mobility choices. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 106, 309-319. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.09.021.

Google Scholar Crossref

Breheny, M. & Stephens, C. (2009). 'I sort of pay back in my own little way': Managing independence and social connectedness through reciprocity. Ageing and Society, 29(8), 1295-1313. doi:10.1017/S0144686X09990134.

Google Scholar Crossref

Buffel, T., McGarry, P., Phillipson, C., Donder, L. den, Dury, S., Witte, N. de, Smetcoren, A. & Verté, D. (2014). Developing age-friendly cities: Case studies from Brussels and Manchester and implications for policy and practice. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1-2), 52-72. doi:10.1080/08959420.2014.855043.

Google Scholar Crossref

Custers, A.F.J., Westerhof, G.J., Kuin, Y., Gerritsen, D.L. & Riksen-Walraven, J.M. (2012). Relatedness, autonomy, and competence in the caring relationship: The perspective of nursing home residents. Journal of Aging Studies, 26(3), 319-326. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2012.02.005.

Google Scholar Crossref

Davies, A. & James, A. (2011). Geographies of ageing: social processes and the spatial unevenness of population ageing. Farnham: Ashgate.

Google Scholar Crossref

Douma, L., Steverink, N., Hutter, I. & Meijering, L. (2017). Exploring subjective well-being in older age by using participant-generated word clouds. The Gerontologist, 57(2), 229–239. doi:10.1093/geront/gnv119.

Google Scholar Crossref

Entwistle, V.A. & Watt, I.S. (2013). Treating patients as persons: A capabilities approach to support delivery of person-centred care. The American Journal of Bioethics, 13(8), 29-39. doi:10.1080/15265161.2013.802060.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gilleard, C. & Higgs, P. (2010). Aging without agency: Theorizing the fourth age. Ageing & Mental Health, 14(2), 121-128. doi: 10.1080/13607860903228762.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gilroy, R. (2005). The role of housing space in determining freedom and flourishing in older people. Social Indicators Research, 74(1), 141-158. doi: 10.1007/s11205-005-6520-5.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gilroy, R. (2006). Taking a capabilities approach to evaluating supportive environments for older people. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(3-4), 343-356. doi:10.1007/s11482-007-9025-3.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gilroy, R. (2008). Places that support human flourishing: Lessons from later life. Planning Theory and Practice, 9(2), 145-163. doi: 10.1080/14649350802041548.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gopinath, M. (2018). Thinking about later life: insights from the capability approach. Ageing International, 43, 254–264. doi: 10.1007/s12126-018-9323-0.

Google Scholar Crossref

Grewal, I., Lewis, J., Flynn, T., Brown, J., Bond, J. & Coast, J. (2006). Developing attributes for a generic quality of life measure for older people: Preferences or capabilities? Social Science & Medicine, 62(8), 1891-1901. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.023.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hamilton-Baillie, B. (2008). Towards shared space. Urban Design International, 13(2), 130-138. doi: 10.1057/udi.2008.13.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hammarström, G. & Torres, S. (2010). Being, feeling and acting: A qualitative study of Swedish home-help care recipients' understandings of dependence and independence. Journal of Aging Studies, 24(1), 75-87. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2008.10.002.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hoven, B. van, Brouwer, A.E. & Meijering, L. (2012). Introduction: Geographies of ageing and well-being. European Spatial Research and Policy 19(1), 9-15. doi: 10.2478/v10105-012-0002-y.

Google Scholar Crossref

Joffe, H. and Yardley, L. (2003). Content and thematic analysis. In Marks. D.F. & Yardley, L. (eds.). Research methods for clinical and health psychology (pp. 56-68). London: Sage.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kendig, H. & Phillipson, C. (2014). Building age-friendly communities: New approaches to challenging health and social inequalities. In The British Academy (ed.), "If you could do one thing": Nine local actions to reduce health inequalities (pp. 102-111). London: the British Academy.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kimberley, H., Gruhn, R. & Huggins, S. (2012). Valuing capabilities in later life. the capability approach and the Brotherhood of St Laurence aged services. Brotherhood of St Laurence, Fitzroy.

Google Scholar Crossref

King, P. (2007). The concept of wellbeing and its application in a study of ageing in Aotearoa New Zealand. (Working Paper No. 8). Family Centre. Social Policy Research Unit, Wellington.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kwaliteitsinstituut Nederlandse Gemeenten (KING) [Quality institute Dutch Municipalities] (2017). Gemeentelijke Monitor Sociaal Domein [Municipal Monitor of the Social Domain]. Available through: https://www.waarstaatjegemeente.nl. Kwaliteitsinstituut Nederlandse Gemeenten [Quality institute Dutch Municipalities], the Hague, accessed on July 31, 2018.

Google Scholar Crossref

Lager, D., van Hoven, B. & Huigen, P.P.P. (2015). Understanding older adults' social capital in place: Obstacles to and opportunities for social contacts in the neighborhood. Geoforum, 59(1), 87-97. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.12.009.

Google Scholar Crossref

Leefbaarometer [Liveability Monitor] 2014. Leefbaarheidssituatie [Liveability]. Available through: http://www.leefbaarometer.nl. Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations, the Hague, accessed on July 31, 2018.

Google Scholar Crossref

Lloyd-Sherlock, P. (2002). Nussbaum, capabilities and older people. Journal of International Development, 14(8), 1163-1173. doi:10.1002/jid.958.

Google Scholar Crossref

Meer, M. van der, Droogleever Fortuijn, J. & Thissen, F. (2008). Vulnerability and environmental stress of older adults in deprived neighborhoods in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 99(1), 53-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2008.00439.x.

Google Scholar Crossref

Mitchell, L. & Burton, E. (2006). Neighborhoods for life: Designing dementia‐friendly outdoor environments. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 7(1), 26-33. doi: 10.1108/14717794200600005.

Google Scholar Crossref

Nussbaum, M.C. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 33–59. doi: 10.1080/1354570022000077926.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ootegem, L. van & Spillemaeckers, S. (2010). With a focus on well-being and capabilities. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39(3), 384-390. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2009.11.005.

Google Scholar Crossref

Paulos, L. & Fragoso, A. (2017). Reclaiming the community potential to improve the lives of older citizens. Research on Ageing and Social Policy, 5(1), 57-81. doi: 10.4471/rasp.2017.2450.

Google Scholar Crossref

Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93-117. doi:10.1080/146498805200034266.

Google Scholar Crossref

Robeyns, I. (2006). The capability approach in practice. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(3), 351-376. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00263.x.

Google Scholar Crossref

Robeyns, I. (2016). The capability approach. In Zalta, E.N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford. Available online at https://plato.stanford.edu [Accessed 31 July 2018].

Google Scholar Crossref

Rogers, S.H., Halstead, J.M., Gardner, K.H. & Carlson, C.H. (2011). Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6(2), 201-213. doi: 10.1007/s11482-010-9132-4.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ryan, J., Wretstrand, A. & Schmidt, S.M. (2015). Exploring public transport as an element of older persons' mobility: A capability approach perspective. Journal of Transport Geography, 48, 105-114. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.08.016.

Google Scholar Crossref

Schie, T. van, Froentjes, M., Berg, K. van der, & Genk, J. van. (2004). Zorgen voor morgen. Een zoektocht naar nieuwe vormen van wonen, zorg en welzijn [Care in the future. In search of new forms of housing, care and well-being]. Groningen: Groningen Municipality.

Google Scholar Crossref

Schwanen, T., Banister, D. & Bowling, A. (2012). Independence and mobility in later life. Geoforum, 43(6), 1313-1322. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.04.001.

Google Scholar Crossref

Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In Nussbaum, M. and Sen, A. (eds), The quality of life. A study prepared for the World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER) of the United Nations University (pp.30-54). Oxford: Clarendon.

Google Scholar Crossref

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Shura, R., Siders, R.A. & Dannefer, D. (2010). Culture change in long-term care: Participatory action research and the role of the resident. The Gerontologist, 51(2), 212-225. doi:10.1093/geront/gnq099.

Google Scholar Crossref

Smith, A. (2009). Ageing in urban neighbourhoods: Place attachment and social exclusion. Bristol: Policy Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Stephens, C. (2016). From success to capability for healthy ageing: shifting the lens to include all older people. Critical Public Health. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2016.1192583.

Google Scholar Crossref

Stephens, C. & Breheny, M. (2019). Healthy ageing. A capability approach to inclusive policy and practice. London: Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Thornberg, R. (2012). Informed grounded theory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(3), 243-259. doi:10.1080/00313831.2011.581686.

Google Scholar Crossref

Verkerk, M.A., Busschbach, J.J. & Karssing, E.D. (2001). Health-related quality of life research and the capability approach of Amartya Sen. Quality of Life Research, 10(1), 49-55. doi: 10.1023/A:1016652515418.

Google Scholar Crossref

Volkert, J. & Schneider, F. (2012). A literature survey of disaggregating general well-being: Empirical capability approach assessments of young and old generations in affluent countries. Sociology Study, 2(6), 397-416.

Google Scholar Crossref

World Health Organization (WHO) (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Google Scholar Crossref

World Health Organization (WHO) (2015). Measuring the age-friendliness of cities. A guide to using core indicators. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Google Scholar Crossref

Yeung, P. & Breheny, M. (2016). Using the capability approach to understand the determinants of subjective well-being among community-dwelling older people in New Zealand. Age and Ageing, 45, 292–298. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw002.

Google Scholar Crossref

Downloads

Published

2019-01-30
Logo Metrics

Almetric

Dimensions

How to Cite

Meijering, L., van Hoven, B., & Yousefzadeh, S. (2019). “I think I’m better at it myself”: the Capability Approach and Being Independent in Later Life. Research on Ageing and Social Policy, 7(1), 229–259. https://doi.org/10.17583/rasp.2019.3678

Issue

Section

Articles