Perceptions of Giftedness and Classroom Practice with Gifted Children – an Exploratory Study of Primary School Teachers
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
The Decree-Law 54/2018 combined with Ordinance 223-A / 2018 - Article 33 regulates the inclusion of gifted students in Portuguese schools. This study aims to investigate primary school teachers` perceptions of giftedness and their experiences of working with gifted children in their regular classes. This is an exploratory study with 13 teachers and the data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Our participants tended to represent giftedness with an emphasis on the intellectual traits of gifted learners and to adjust their pedagogical approach accordingly. Their assessment practices focused essentially on product-oriented approaches instead of process-oriented approaches. Our findings suggest that there is still a long way to go, especially in terms of formal teacher training, to tailor teaching to the needs and characteristics of gifted learners.
Downloads
References
Alencar, E. (2007). Caraterísticas sócio-emocionais do sobredotado: Questões atuais. Psicologia em Estudo, 12(2), 371-378. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-73722007000200018.
Google Scholar CrossrefAltintas, E., & Ilgun, S. (2016). The term “gifted children” from teachers` view. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(10), 957-965. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.2762.
Google Scholar CrossrefAzevedo, S., & Mettrau, M. (2010). Altas habilidades/superdotação: Mitos e ilemas docentes na indicação para o atendimento. Psicologia, Ciência e Profissão, 30(1), 32-45. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-98932010000100004
Google Scholar CrossrefBaudson, T. G., & Preckel, F. (2013). Teachers' implicit personality theories about the gifted: An experimental approach. School Psychology Quarterly, 28, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000011.
Google Scholar CrossrefBenny, N., & Blonder, R. (2016). Factors that promote/inhibit teaching gifted students in a regular class: Results from a professional development program for chemistry teachers. Education Research International, ID 2742905. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2742905.
Google Scholar CrossrefBraun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Google Scholar CrossrefCamelo, S. (2014). Os alunos sobredotados no olhar dos docentes do 1º ciclo. (Unpublished Masters Thesis). Fernando Pessoa University.
Google Scholar CrossrefClark, B. (2008). Growing up gifted (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar CrossrefCohen, L., Manion, L., & Richardson, K. (2019). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefCourt, D. (2013). What is truth in qualitative research? Why is this important for education? Educational Practice and Theory, 35(2), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.7459/ept/32.2.02.
Google Scholar CrossrefCresswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed method research (2nd ed.). Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefCross, J. R., & Cross, T. L. (2015). Clinical and mental health issues in counseling the gifted individual. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93(2), 163-172. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2015.00192.x.
Google Scholar CrossrefGama, M. (2007). Parceria entre família e escola. In D. S. Fleith (Ed.), A construção de práticas educacionais para alunos com altas habilidades/sobredotação. (Vol. 3, pp. 61-73). Ministério da Educação, Secretaria de Educação Especial.
Google Scholar CrossrefJie, L. Z., & Hassan, S. A. (2019). School counseling services for gifted and talented students: a systematic review of literature. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 15, 128-133.
Google Scholar CrossrefKhalil, M., & Accariya, Z. (2016). Identifying “good” teachers for gifted students. Creative Education, 7, 407-418. https://doi.org/07. 407-418. 10.4236/ce.2016.73040
Google Scholar CrossrefLassig, C. J. (2009). Teachers’ attitudes towards the gifted: The importance of professional development and school culture. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 18, 32–42. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/32480/1/32480.pdf.
Google Scholar CrossrefLincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefLittle, C. (2012). Curriculum as motivation for gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 619-723. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21621.
Google Scholar CrossrefMartin, L., Burns, R., & Schonlau, M. (2009). Mental disorders among gifted and nongifted youth: A selected review of the epidemiologic literature. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209352684.
Google Scholar CrossrefMatheis, S., Kronborg, L., Schmitt, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Threat or challenge? Teacher beliefs about gifted students and their relationship to teacher motivation. Gifted and Talented International, 32(2), 134-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2018.1537685.
Google Scholar CrossrefMarton, F. (1986). Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28-49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42589189
Google Scholar CrossrefMarton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Google Scholar CrossrefMiranda, L., & Almeida, L. (2019). Apoio educativo aos alunos com altas capacidades: Legislação nas primeiras duas décadas do século XXI em Portugal. Revista Amazónica, XXIV(2), 110-131. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7885358
Google Scholar CrossrefMogashoa, T. (2014). Applicability of constructivist theory in qualitative educational research. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 4(7), 51-59. http://www.aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_4_No_7_July_2014/7.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefNarimani, M., & Mousazadeh, T. (2010). A comparison between the metacognitive beliefs of gifted and normal children. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 1563-1566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.236
Google Scholar CrossrefNational Association for Gifted Children (2009). Key considerations in identifying and supporting gifted and talented learners: A report from the 2018 NAGC Definition Task Force. NAGC.
Google Scholar CrossrefNeihart, M., Reis, S. M., Robinson, N. M., & Moon, S. M. (2002). The social and emotional development of gifted children. What do we know? Prufrock.
Google Scholar CrossrefNetz, H. (2014). Gifted Conversations: Discursive Patterns in Gifted Classes. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(2), 149-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214523312
Google Scholar CrossrefNewman T. M. (2008). Assessment of giftedness in school-age children using measures of intelligence or cognitive abilities. In S. I. Pfeiffer (eds.), Handbook of giftedness in children (pp. 161–176). Springer.
Google Scholar CrossrefOlszewski-Kubilius, P., Lee, S.-Y., & Thomson, D. (2014). Family Environment and Social Development in Gifted Students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214526430.
Google Scholar CrossrefOlszewski-Kubilius, P., Subotnik, R. F., & Worrell, F. C. (2015). Antecedent and concurrent psychosocial skills that support high levels of achievement within talent domains. High Ability Studies, 26(2), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1095077.
Google Scholar CrossrefOlthouse, J. (2014). How do preservice teachers conceptualize giftedness? A Metaphor Analysis. Roeper Rev., 36(2), 122-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2014.884200.
Google Scholar CrossrefOrmston, R., Spencer, L., Barnard, M., & Snape, D. (2014). The foundations of qualitative research. In J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, M. N. Carol, & R. Ormston (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (2nd ed., pp. 1-25). Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefOzcan, D., & Kotek, A. (2015). What do the teachers think about gifted students? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 190, 569-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.044
Google Scholar CrossrefPatton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefPedersen, F., & Kronborg, L. (2014). Challenging secondary teachers to examine beliefs and pedagogy when teaching highly able students in mixed-ability health education classes. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 23(1), 15–27. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/aeipt.203919
Google Scholar CrossrefPlunkett, M., & Kronborg, L. (2011). Learning to be a teacher of the gifted: The importance of examining opinions and challenging misconceptions. Gifted and Talented International, 26(1-2), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2011.11673587
Google Scholar CrossrefPreckel, F., Baudson, T. G., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., & Glock, S. (2015). Gifted and maladjusted? Implicit attitudes and automatic associations related to gifted children. American Educational Research Journal, 52(6), 1160–1184. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215596413.
Google Scholar CrossrefPresidência do Conselho de Ministros. Decree-law nº 54/2018, 6th July. Diário da República. Série I, Educação. https://dre.pt/home/-/dre/115652961/details/maximized.
Google Scholar CrossrefPresidência do Conselho de Ministros. Ordinance 223-A/2018, 3rd August. Diário da República. Série I, Educação. https://dre.pt/home/-/dre/115886163/details/maximized.
Google Scholar CrossrefReis-Jorge, J., Ferreira, M., & Olcina-Sempere, G. (2020). La figura del profesorado-investigador en la reconstrucción de la profesionalidad docente en un mundo en transformación. Revista Educación, Universidad de Costa Rica, Costa Rica, 44(1). https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v44i1.39044
Google Scholar CrossrefRimm, S. (2002). Peer Pressures and Social Acceptance of Gifted Students. In M. Neihart, S. Reis, & S. Moon (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 13-18). Prufrock Press, Inc.
Google Scholar CrossrefRinn, A. N. (2018). Social and emotional considerations for gifted students. In S. I. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick, & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 453-464). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-029
Google Scholar CrossrefRocha, A. (Coord.) (2017). Altas capacidades e sobredotação: Compreender, identificar, atuar. Associação Nacional para o Estudo e Intervenção na Sobredotação (ANEIS).
Google Scholar CrossrefRodrigues, C., & Antunes, A. P. (2012). Escola inclusiva e sobredotação: Estudo exploratório sobre as percepções dos professores. In L. S. Almeida, B. D. Silva & A. Franco (Orgs.), Actas do II Seminário Internacional "Contributos da Psicologia em Contextos Educativos", Braga, (pp. 637-647). http://hdl.handle.net/10400.13/288
Google Scholar CrossrefRowley, J. (2012). Professional development needs of teachers to identify and cater for gifted students. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 21(2), 75-80.
Google Scholar CrossrefSayı, A. (2018). Teachers’ views about the teacher training program for gifted education. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(4), 262-273. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n5p262.
Google Scholar CrossrefSchleicher, A. (2018). Valuing our teachers and raising their status: How communities can help. International Summit on the Teaching Profession, OECD Publishing.
Google Scholar CrossrefSeidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College, Columbia University.
Google Scholar CrossrefSemrud-Clikeman, M. (2007). Social competence in children who are gifted and talented. In M. Semrud-Clikeman, Social competence in children (pp. 149-163). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71366-3
Google Scholar CrossrefShenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63-75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201.
Google Scholar CrossrefStanley, T. (2012). Project-based learning for gifted students: A handbook for the 21st century classroom. Prufrock Press Inc.
Google Scholar CrossrefVagle, M. D. (2018). Crafting phenomenological research (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefVaivre-Douret, L. (2011). Developmental and cognitive characteristics of "high-level potentialities" (highly gifted) children. International Journal of Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/420297
Google Scholar CrossrefVanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2005). Challenges and possibilities for serving gifted learners in the regular classroom. Theory Into Practice, 44(3), 211-217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4403_5
Google Scholar CrossrefWearmouth, J., Edwards, G., & Richmond, R. (2000). Teachers' professional development to support inclusive practices. Journal of In-Service Education, 26(1), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580000200111
Google Scholar CrossrefWebb, J., Gore, J., Amend, E., & DeVries, A. (2007). A parent's guide to gifted children. Great Potential Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefWelsh, M. E. (2011). Measuring teacher effectiveness in gifted education: Some challenges and suggestions. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(5), 750–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X11424882
Google Scholar CrossrefWood, V., & Laycraft, K. (2020). How can we better understand, identify, and support highly gifted and profoundly gifted students? A literature review of the psychological development of highly-profoundly gifted individuals and overexcitabilities. Annals of Cognitive Science, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.36959/447/348
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Qualitative Research in Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
