Deep Impact: How a Job-Embedded Formative Assessment Professional Development Model Affected Teacher Practice
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
This study supports the work of Black and Wiliam (1998), who demonstrated that when teachers effectively utilize formative assessment strategies, student learning increases significantly. However, the researchers also found a “poverty of practice” among teachers, in that few fully understood how to implement classroom formative assessment. This qualitative case study examined a series of voluntary workshops offered at one middle school designed to address this poverty of practice. Data were gathered via semi-structured interviews. These research questions framed the study: (1) What role did a professional learning community structure play in shaping workshop participants’ perceived effectiveness of a voluntary formative assessment initiative? (2) How did this initiative affect workshop participants’ perceptions of their knowledge of formative assessment and differentiation strategies? (3) How did it affect workshop participants’ perceptions of their abilities to teach others about formative assessment and differentiated instruction? (4) How did it affect school-wide use of classroom-level strategies?
Results indicated that teacher workshop participants experienced a growth in their capacity to use and teach others various formative assessment strategies, and even non-participating teachers reported greater use of formative assessment in their own instruction. Workshop participants and non-participating teachers perceived little growth in the area of differentiation of instruction, which contradicted some administrator perceptions.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. Cambridge, UK: School of Education, Cambridge University.
Google ScholarBlack, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan 86(1), 9-21.
Google ScholarBlack, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan 80(2), 130-148.
Google ScholarBusha, C. H., & Harter, S. P. (1980). Research methods in librarianship. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
Google ScholarCampbell, M. F. (2011). The PLC at work cartoon book. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Google ScholarCauley, K., & McMillan, J. (2010). Formative assessment techniques to support student motivation and achievement. The Clearing House 83(1), 1-6.
Google ScholarChappuis, J. (2009). Seven strategies of assessment for learning. Portland, OR: Educational Testing Service.
Google ScholarChappuis, S., Chappuis, J., Stiggins, R. (2009). Supporting teacher learning teams. Educational Leadership, 66(5), 56-60.
Google ScholarChappuis, S., Commodore, C., & Stiggins, R. (2010). Assessment balance and quality: An action guide for school leaders (3rd ed.). Portland, OR: Assessment Training Institute.
Google ScholarCommon Core State Standards Initiative. (2010, November 24). In the states. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/in-the-states#maine
Google ScholarDenzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2008). Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Google ScholarDrago-Severson, E. (2008). 4 practices serve as pillars for adult learning. JSD, 29(4), 60-63.
Google ScholarDuFour, R., DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (2006). Professional learning communities at work plan book. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Google ScholarDuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Karhanek, G. (2004). Whatever it takes: How professional learning communities respond when kids don’t learn. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Google ScholarDuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Karhanek, G. (2009). Raising the bar and closing the gap: Whatever it takes. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Google ScholarDuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2010). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work (2nd ed.). (2010). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Google ScholarDuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Google ScholarDuFour, R., Eaker, R., & DuFour, R. (Eds.). (2005). On common ground: The power of professional learning communities. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.
Google ScholarEaker, R., DuFour, R., and DuFour, R. (2002). Getting started: Reculturing schools to become professional learning communities. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.
Google ScholarEaker, R., DuFour, R., and DuFour, R. (2007). A leader’s companion: Inspiration for professional learning communities at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Google ScholarFuchs, L. S. & Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children , 53, 199-208.
Google ScholarGeertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Google ScholarGlaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
Google ScholarGraham, P., & Ferriter, W. F. (2009). Building a professional learning community at work: A guide to the first year. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Google ScholarHolman, B. (2007). Align, assess, achieve [DVD]. United States: Westerville City Schools.
Google ScholarHouchens, G. W. (2008). Principal theories of practice: Mapping the cognitive structure and effects of instructional leadership (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3333813)
Google ScholarJackson, D., & Street, H. (2005). What does collaborative enquiry look like? In H. Street & J. Temperly (Eds.), Improving schools through collaborative enquiry (pp. 41-70). London: Continuum.
Google ScholarKentucky Association for School Councils – KASC. (2010). Understanding Senate Bill 1: Resource booklet. Danville, KY: KASC.
Google ScholarKnowles, M. S. (1968). Andragogy, not pedagogy. Adult Leadership, 16, 350-382, 386.
Google ScholarKnowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (1998). The adult learner (5th ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
Google ScholarKotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 59-67.
Google ScholarKotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Google ScholarLave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google ScholarLincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Google ScholarThe Merton Institute for Contemplative Living. (2010, November). Dialogue session 3: Why contemplative leadership? Contemplative Leadership Retreat, Bethany Springs Retreat Center, New Haven, KY.
Google ScholarMerton, T. (1961). New seeds of contemplation. New York, NY: New Directions Publishing.
Google ScholarMerton, T. (2004). The inner experience: Notes on contemplation. San Francisco, CA: Harper.
Google ScholarMiles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google ScholarNo Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. (2001).
Google ScholarPalmer, P. (2000). Let your life speak: Listening for the voice of vocation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google ScholarPopham, W. J. (2006). Phony formative assessments: Buyer beware! Educational Leadership, 64(3), 86-87.
Google ScholarPopham, W. J. (2008). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Google ScholarPopham, W. J. (2011a). Combating phony formative assessment – with a hyphen. Education Week 30(21), 35.
Google ScholarPopham, W. J. (2011b, Spring). Exposing the imbalance in “balanced assessment.” Better: Evidence-based Education, 14-15.
Google ScholarS. Bill 1, Kentucky Legislature 09RS (2009) (enacted). Retrieved from http://www.lrc.ky.gov/record/09rs/SB1.htm.
Google ScholarSadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
Google ScholarSchmoker, M. (2011). Focus. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Google ScholarScriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagne, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (Vol. 1, pp. 39-83). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Google ScholarSteindl-Rast, D. (1999). A listening heart: The spirituality of sacred sensuousness (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Crossroad.
Google ScholarStiggins, R. (2004). New assessment beliefs for a new school mission. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 22-27.
Google ScholarStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google ScholarTajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96-102.
Google ScholarTajfel, H. (1972). Some developments in European social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 307-322.
Google ScholarTajfel, H. (Ed.). (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
Google ScholarTajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google ScholarTajfel, H. (1982). The social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
Google ScholarTajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flamant, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149-178.
Google ScholarTajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Google ScholarTomlinson, C. A. (1999). Mapping a route toward a differentiated instruction. Educational Leadership, 57(1), 12-16.
Google ScholarTomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Google ScholarWenger, E. (2007). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Retrieved January 3, 2011, from http://www.ewenger.com/theory/index.htm.
Google ScholarWolcott, H. F. (2009). Writing up qualitative research (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Google ScholarDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The opinions and contents of the manuscript published in QRE are under exclusive responsibility of the author(s). Therefore, authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permission for reproducing the material published in other publications.
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.