Deep Impact: How a Job-Embedded Formative Assessment Professional Development Model Affected Teacher Practice
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
This study supports the work of Black and Wiliam (1998), who demonstrated that when teachers effectively utilize formative assessment strategies, student learning increases significantly. However, the researchers also found a “poverty of practice” among teachers, in that few fully understood how to implement classroom formative assessment. This qualitative case study examined a series of voluntary workshops offered at one middle school designed to address this poverty of practice. Data were gathered via semi-structured interviews. These research questions framed the study: (1) What role did a professional learning community structure play in shaping workshop participants’ perceived effectiveness of a voluntary formative assessment initiative? (2) How did this initiative affect workshop participants’ perceptions of their knowledge of formative assessment and differentiation strategies? (3) How did it affect workshop participants’ perceptions of their abilities to teach others about formative assessment and differentiated instruction? (4) How did it affect school-wide use of classroom-level strategies?
Results indicated that teacher workshop participants experienced a growth in their capacity to use and teach others various formative assessment strategies, and even non-participating teachers reported greater use of formative assessment in their own instruction. Workshop participants and non-participating teachers perceived little growth in the area of differentiation of instruction, which contradicted some administrator perceptions.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. Cambridge, UK: School of Education, Cambridge University.
Google Scholar CrossrefBlack, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan 86(1), 9-21.
Google Scholar CrossrefBlack, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan 80(2), 130-148.
Google Scholar CrossrefBusha, C. H., & Harter, S. P. (1980). Research methods in librarianship. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
Google Scholar CrossrefCampbell, M. F. (2011). The PLC at work cartoon book. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Google Scholar CrossrefCauley, K., & McMillan, J. (2010). Formative assessment techniques to support student motivation and achievement. The Clearing House 83(1), 1-6.
Google Scholar CrossrefChappuis, J. (2009). Seven strategies of assessment for learning. Portland, OR: Educational Testing Service.
Google Scholar CrossrefChappuis, S., Chappuis, J., Stiggins, R. (2009). Supporting teacher learning teams. Educational Leadership, 66(5), 56-60.
Google Scholar CrossrefChappuis, S., Commodore, C., & Stiggins, R. (2010). Assessment balance and quality: An action guide for school leaders (3rd ed.). Portland, OR: Assessment Training Institute.
Google Scholar CrossrefCommon Core State Standards Initiative. (2010, November 24). In the states. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/in-the-states#maine
Google Scholar CrossrefDenzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2008). Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefDrago-Severson, E. (2008). 4 practices serve as pillars for adult learning. JSD, 29(4), 60-63.
Google Scholar CrossrefDuFour, R., DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (2006). Professional learning communities at work plan book. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Google Scholar CrossrefDuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Karhanek, G. (2004). Whatever it takes: How professional learning communities respond when kids don’t learn. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Google Scholar CrossrefDuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Karhanek, G. (2009). Raising the bar and closing the gap: Whatever it takes. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Google Scholar CrossrefDuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2010). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work (2nd ed.). (2010). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Google Scholar CrossrefDuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Google Scholar CrossrefDuFour, R., Eaker, R., & DuFour, R. (Eds.). (2005). On common ground: The power of professional learning communities. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.
Google Scholar CrossrefEaker, R., DuFour, R., and DuFour, R. (2002). Getting started: Reculturing schools to become professional learning communities. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.
Google Scholar CrossrefEaker, R., DuFour, R., and DuFour, R. (2007). A leader’s companion: Inspiration for professional learning communities at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Google Scholar CrossrefFuchs, L. S. & Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children , 53, 199-208.
Google Scholar CrossrefGeertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Google Scholar CrossrefGlaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
Google Scholar CrossrefGraham, P., & Ferriter, W. F. (2009). Building a professional learning community at work: A guide to the first year. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Google Scholar CrossrefHolman, B. (2007). Align, assess, achieve [DVD]. United States: Westerville City Schools.
Google Scholar CrossrefHouchens, G. W. (2008). Principal theories of practice: Mapping the cognitive structure and effects of instructional leadership (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3333813)
Google Scholar CrossrefJackson, D., & Street, H. (2005). What does collaborative enquiry look like? In H. Street & J. Temperly (Eds.), Improving schools through collaborative enquiry (pp. 41-70). London: Continuum.
Google Scholar CrossrefKentucky Association for School Councils – KASC. (2010). Understanding Senate Bill 1: Resource booklet. Danville, KY: KASC.
Google Scholar CrossrefKnowles, M. S. (1968). Andragogy, not pedagogy. Adult Leadership, 16, 350-382, 386.
Google Scholar CrossrefKnowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (1998). The adult learner (5th ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
Google Scholar CrossrefKotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 59-67.
Google Scholar CrossrefKotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefLave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefLincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar CrossrefThe Merton Institute for Contemplative Living. (2010, November). Dialogue session 3: Why contemplative leadership? Contemplative Leadership Retreat, Bethany Springs Retreat Center, New Haven, KY.
Google Scholar CrossrefMerton, T. (1961). New seeds of contemplation. New York, NY: New Directions Publishing.
Google Scholar CrossrefMerton, T. (2004). The inner experience: Notes on contemplation. San Francisco, CA: Harper.
Google Scholar CrossrefMiles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar CrossrefNo Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. (2001).
Google Scholar CrossrefPalmer, P. (2000). Let your life speak: Listening for the voice of vocation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar CrossrefPopham, W. J. (2006). Phony formative assessments: Buyer beware! Educational Leadership, 64(3), 86-87.
Google Scholar CrossrefPopham, W. J. (2008). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Google Scholar CrossrefPopham, W. J. (2011a). Combating phony formative assessment – with a hyphen. Education Week 30(21), 35.
Google Scholar CrossrefPopham, W. J. (2011b, Spring). Exposing the imbalance in “balanced assessment.” Better: Evidence-based Education, 14-15.
Google Scholar CrossrefS. Bill 1, Kentucky Legislature 09RS (2009) (enacted). Retrieved from http://www.lrc.ky.gov/record/09rs/SB1.htm.
Google Scholar CrossrefSadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
Google Scholar CrossrefSchmoker, M. (2011). Focus. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Google Scholar CrossrefScriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagne, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (Vol. 1, pp. 39-83). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Google Scholar CrossrefSteindl-Rast, D. (1999). A listening heart: The spirituality of sacred sensuousness (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Crossroad.
Google Scholar CrossrefStiggins, R. (2004). New assessment beliefs for a new school mission. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 22-27.
Google Scholar CrossrefStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefTajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96-102.
Google Scholar CrossrefTajfel, H. (1972). Some developments in European social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 307-322.
Google Scholar CrossrefTajfel, H. (Ed.). (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefTajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefTajfel, H. (1982). The social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
Google Scholar CrossrefTajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flamant, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149-178.
Google Scholar CrossrefTajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Google Scholar CrossrefTomlinson, C. A. (1999). Mapping a route toward a differentiated instruction. Educational Leadership, 57(1), 12-16.
Google Scholar CrossrefTomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Google Scholar CrossrefWenger, E. (2007). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Retrieved January 3, 2011, from http://www.ewenger.com/theory/index.htm.
Google Scholar CrossrefWolcott, H. F. (2009). Writing up qualitative research (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The opinions and contents of the manuscript published in QRE are under exclusive responsibility of the author(s). Therefore, authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permission for reproducing the material published in other publications.
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
