An Exploration of Iranian EFL Teachers’ Perceptions on the Globalization and Hegemony of English
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
Globalization as an increasingly influencing force has led English language to become the lingua franca of the world. However, the global spread of English is considered as linguistic and cultural imperialism of English speaking countries to exert their dominance, power, culture, ideology and language over the periphery countries. The devastating consequence of this hegemony, according to Canagarajah (2005) can be putting learners in danger of losing their languages, cultures, and identities, giving rise to the devaluation of their local knowledge and cultures. Here, the researchers administ interview to explore thirty-seven experienced Iranian EFL teachers’ (18males/19females) perceptions on English globalization and its hegemony, who were selected based on purposive sampling. The researchers’ adoption of Strauss and Corbin’s (1998) constant comparative method revealed that although Iranian English teachers admitted globalization as an inevitable reality and English language as a tool in the service of globalization to smooth communication among people, they took up a counter-hegemonic stance and resistance towards the values associated with its use. They also suggested some anti-hegemonic strategies to de-colonize the power, culture, values, and ideologies of the West which tries to marginalize other countries and people.
Downloads
References
Abbercromtic, N. Hill.S.,& Turner. B.S. (1988). Sociology, Dictionary of Sociology. London: Penguin Books.
Google Scholar CrossrefAliakbari, M. (2004). The Place of Culture in the Iranian ELT Textbooks in High School Level. 1-14.The 9th Pan-Pacific association of Applied Linguistics Conference, Korea.
Google Scholar CrossrefAry, D. Jacobs, L.C., & Sorenson, C. (2010). Introduction to Research Education (8th Ed.). New York, NY: Wadsworth.
Google Scholar CrossrefBisong. (1995). Language choice and cultural imperialism. ELT Journal, 49(2), 22-132.
Google Scholar CrossrefBottery, M. (2000). Education, policy and ethics. London: Continuum.
Google Scholar CrossrefBourdieu, P. (2001). Conter-feux 2. Pour un mouvement social Europeen. Paris: Raison d’agir.
Google Scholar CrossrefBrown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Google Scholar CrossrefBucher, S. (2004). Globalization and structural violence. Paper presented for the 5th global conference “Cultures of Violence”, University of Oxford. Retrieved September 20, 2011, from http:// www.inter-disciplinary.net › ... › Violence › Project Archives
Google Scholar CrossrefCanagarajah, S. (1999a). On EFL teachers, awareness, and agency. ELT Journal, 53, 207-214.
Google Scholar CrossrefCanagarajah, S. (1999b). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefCanagarajah, S. (2005). Introduction. In Reclaiming the local in the language policy and practice, ed. A. S. Canagarajah, xiii-xxx. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar CrossrefChang, J. (2006). Globalization and English in Chinese higher education. World Englishes. 25 (3), 513–525.
Google Scholar CrossrefChoi, P. K. (2010) ‘Weep for Chinese University’: A case study of English hegemony and academic capitalism in higher education in Hong Kong. Journal of Education Policy, 25 (2) , 233-252.
Google Scholar CrossrefCook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 185-210.
Google Scholar CrossrefCook, V. (2004, 12-14 November). Bilingual cognition and language teaching. Paper presented at the 13th International Symposium on English Teaching, Taipei. Retrieved April 15, 2015, from http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9781848729247/
Google Scholar CrossrefCook, V. (2008). Second language learning and language teaching (4th ed.). UK: Hodder Education.
Google Scholar CrossrefCrystal, D. (1995). The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefCrystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefDua, H.R. (1994). Hegemony of English. Mysore: Yashoda Publications.
Google Scholar CrossrefFairclough, N. (1997). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Addison-Wesley.
Google Scholar CrossrefGaffey, E. (2005). Biting your tongue: Globalised power and the international language. Variant, 2(22), 12-15.
Google Scholar CrossrefGidden, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefGuo, Y. & Beckett, G. H., (2007) The Hegemony of English as a Global Language: Reclaiming Local Knowledge and Culture in China. Convergence, 40 (1-2) , 117-132.
Google Scholar CrossrefIgawa, K. (2010). The impact of English language and ELT: Perceptions by EFL teachers. Shitennoji University Bulletin, 50, 297-317.
Google Scholar CrossrefIsik, A. (2008). Linguistic imperialism and foreign language teaching. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 5(1), 123-144.
Google Scholar CrossrefJenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language: New models, new norms, new goals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefKanpol, B. (1999).Critical pedagogy: An introduction (2nd ed.). The United States of America: Bergin& Garvey.
Google Scholar CrossrefKetabi, S., & Shomoosi, N. (2007). Native speaker norms and teaching English as an international language. Iranian Journal of Language Studies (IJIS), 1(3), 171-180.
Google Scholar CrossrefKhajavi, Y., & Abbasian, R. (2011). English language teaching, national identity and globalization in Iran: The case of public schools. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 10(1), 181-186.
Google Scholar CrossrefLatouche, S. (1996). The Westernizing of the World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefLiou, Y.S. (2010). Who wants EIL? Attitudes towards English as an international language: A comparative study of college teachers and students in the greater Taipei area. College English: Issues and Trends, 3,133-157.
Google Scholar CrossrefMatsuda, A. (2003). Incorporating world Englishes in teaching English as an international language. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 719-29.
Google Scholar CrossrefMcArthur, T. (2002). The Oxford guide to world English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefMckay, S. L. (2002). Teaching English as an international language: Rethinking goals and approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefMckay, S. L. (2003). Toward an appropriate EIL pedagogy: Re-examining common ELT assumptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 1-22.
Google Scholar CrossrefMehrpour, S., & Vojdani, M. (2012). Globalization and EFL Learning Motivation: A New Perspective on Integrative vs. Instrumental Motivation among Iranian Learners of English. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 2(2), 43-50.
Google Scholar CrossrefModiano, A. (1999). International English in the global village. English Today, 15(2), 22-28.
Google Scholar CrossrefPark, H. (2008). Linguistic imperialism and the English-learning boom in Korea: A case analysis of weekend Korean schools in the U.S. The Review of Korean Studies, 11(2), 117-137.
Google Scholar CrossrefModiano, A. (2001a). Ideology and the ELT practitioner. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 159-173.
Google Scholar CrossrefModiano, A. (2001b). Linguistic imperialism, cultural integrity, and EIL. ELT Journal, (55)4, 339-346.
Google Scholar CrossrefNaji Meidani, E., & Pishghadam, R. (2013). Analysis of English language textbooks in the light of English as an International Language (EIL): A comparative study. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 2(2), 83-96.
Google Scholar CrossrefPennycook, A. (1995). English in the world/The world in English. In Power and inequality in language education, ed. J. W. Tollefson, 34-58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefPennycook, A. (2007). Global Englishes and transcultural flows. NY and London: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefPhillipson, R. H. L. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefPhillipson, R. (2009). Linguistic imperialism continued. NY and London: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefPishghadam, R.,& Zabihi, R. (2012). Crossing the threshold of Iranian TEFL. Applied Research in English, 1(1), 57-71.
Google Scholar CrossrefRajajgopalan, K. (2004). The concept of the ‘world English’ and its implication for ELT. ELT Journal, 58(2), III-17.
Google Scholar CrossrefRazmjoo, S.A. Ranjbar, H, & Hoomanfard, M.H. (2013). On the familiarity of Iranian EFL teachers with post-method, and its realization. The International Journal of Language Learning and Applied LinguisticsWorld, 4(1), 6-16.
Google Scholar CrossrefRedman, C. (2002, June 24). Wanna speak English? Time Magezine World. p. 45.
Google Scholar CrossrefRichards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (3rd ed.). UK: Pearson Education.
Google Scholar CrossrefRitzer, G. (1998). The McDonaldization Thesis, London: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefSafari, P., & Pourhashemi, M.R. (2012). Toward and empowering pedagogy: Is there room for critical pedagogy in educational system of Iran? Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(12), 2548-2555.
Google Scholar CrossrefSchiller, H.I. (1985). ‘Transnational media and national development’, in K. Nordenstreng and H.I. Schiller (eds.) National Sovereignty and International Communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Google Scholar CrossrefShibata, A. (2011). Rethinking the ownership of English as a lingua franca. JAIRO, 42(42), 71-83.
Google Scholar CrossrefShort, J. R., Boniche, A., Kim, Y., & Li, P. L. (2001). Cultural globalisation, global English, and geography journals. Professional Geographer, 53(1), 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00265
Google Scholar CrossrefSifakis, N., & Sougarari, A. (2003). Facing the globalization challenge in the realm of English language. Language and Education, 1(17), 59-71.
Google Scholar CrossrefSimon, R. (1982). Gramsci's Political Thought: An Introduction. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Google Scholar CrossrefStrauss, A.,& Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefWiddowson, H. (1992). ELT and EL teachers: Matter raising. ELT Journal, 46(4), 333-339.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Metrics
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.