Conformity to Masculine Norms and Intellectual Engagement
Keywords:Conformity to masculine norms, intellectual engagement
AbstractResearch on the relationship between masculinity and intellectual engagement may be helpful in exploring the current challenges of male students in academic settings. Although the traditional male role in Western societies has often included notions of winning, competitiveness, and achievement, there is a growing research literature that documents male struggles with achievement, particularly in academic, intellectual, and occupational domains (Morris, 2011; Rosin, 2010; Sax, 2008a, b). In this study, the relationships between conformity to masculine norms and intellectual engagement were explored in a sample of diverse men in the United States. It was predicted that men who more strongly conformed to masculine norms would demonstrate lower intellectual engagement. As predicted, conformity to masculine norms was significantly predictive of lower intellectual engagement on three of the five constructs measured (Openness to Experience, Intellectual Complexity, and Love of Learning). Conformity to masculine norms was not a significant predictor of Need for Cognition or Curiosity.
Addis, M. E., & Mahalik, J. R. (2003). Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. American Psychologist, 58(1), 5-14. doi: 10.1037/0003- 066x.58.1.5
Barrick, M., & Mount, M. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44 (1), 1-26.
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S.D. (2011). Amazon's mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5.
Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Feinstein, J.A., Jarvis, W.B.G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in Need for Cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
Heath Marrs – Masculinity and intellectual engagement
Costa, P.T., Jr., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Costa, P.T., Jr., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R.R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322-331. doi: 10.1037//0022-35220.127.116.112
DiPrete, T. A., & Buchmann, C. (2006). Gender-specific trends in the value of education and the emerging gender gap in college completion. Demography, 43(1), 1-24.
Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429-456.
Goldberg, L.R., Johnson, J.A., Eber, H.W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M.C., Cloninger, C.R., & Gough, H.C. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84-96.
Gough, H.G., & Bradley, P. (1996). CPI manual (3rd Ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Jackson C., & Dempster, S. (2009). 'I sat back on my computer ... with a bottle of whiskey next to me': constructing 'cool' masculinity through 'effortless' achievement in secondary and higher education. Journal of Gender Studies, 18, 341-356.
Kahn, J.S., Brett, B.L., & Holmes, J.R. (2011). Concerns with men's academic motivation in higher education: An exploratory investigation of the role of masculinity. The Journal of Men's Studies, 19, 65-82.
Kinnear, P.R., & Gray, C.D. (2004). SPSS 12 made simple. New York: Psychology Press.
Lusher, D. (2011). Masculinity, educational achievement, and social status: A social network analysis. Gender and Education, 23, 655-675.
McCrae, R. R. & John, O. P. (2001). Big Five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (3), 524-539.
Mahalik, J.R., Locke, B.D., Ludlow, L.H., Diemer, M.A., Scott, R.P., Gottfried, M., & Freitas, G. (2003). Development of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4, 3- 25.
MCS – Masculinities and Social Change, 2(3) 243
Marrs, H., & Sigler, E.A. (2012). Male academic performance in college: The possible role of study strategies. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 13, 227-241. doi: 10.1037/a0022247
Morris, E.W. (2008). “Rednecks,” “rutters,” and 'rithmetic: Social class, masculinity, and schooling in a rural context. Gender & Society, 22, 728-751.
Morris, E.W. (2011). Bridging the gap: 'Doing gender', 'hegemonic masculinity', and the educational troubles of boys. Sociology Compass, 5, 92-103.
Paunonen, S.V., & Jackson, D.N. (1996). The Jackson Personality Inventory and the Five-Factor Model of Personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 42-59.
Parent, M.C., & Moradi, B. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory and development of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory – 46. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 10, 175-189.
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M.E.P. (2004). Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. New York: Oxford University Press.
Poropat, A.E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322-338. Rosin, H. (2010, July/August). The end of men. The Atlantic. Retrieved
February 3, 2011 from
Sax, L. (2008a, September 26). Her college experience is not his. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(5), A32-A33.
Sax, L. (2008b). The gender gap in college: Maximizing the developmental potential of women and men. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Spence, J.T., Helmrich, R., & Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex-role stereotypes and masculinity- femininity. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43.
Von Stumm, S., Hell, B., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2011). The hungry mind: Intellectual curiosity is the third pillar of academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 574-588.
Weaver-Hightower, M.B. (2003). The “boy turn” in research on gender and education. Review of Educational Research, 73, 471-498.