Official Discourse on Family and Fatherhood in Post-1949 China

Authors

  • Tingting Tan Kyushu University

https://doi.org/10.17583/mcs.2020.4943

Keywords:


Downloads

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate three main research questions regarding the history of family and fatherhood in China since 1949: a) What 'ideal father' has the party-state sought to promote at different times? b) How consistent have official messages been? What have been the key shifts in official discourse on family and fatherhood since the Mao era? c) Why have these shifts occurred? Analysis of selected policy statements and print media reveal four main phases, with distinct findings in each. During the period of collectivization (1950s to 70s), the Communist Party of China (CPC) adopted the nationalist model of parenting. Fathers were explicitly suggested to devote themselves to economic development. During the period of de-collectivization (late 1970s to mid-1990s), CPC adopted an individualist model of parenting. There was increasing encouragement for father's participant in child education. During the period of marketization (mid 1990s to 2011), CPC promoted a state-supported model of parenting. Father's active participation in household duties was more expected. During the period of individualization (2012 to the present), China set up community model of parenting. Father's dual role of nurturer and provider is more emphasized.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Tingting Tan, Kyushu University

Tingting Tan is an academic cooperative research fellow at Kyushu University, Japan, whose particular research interests are about fatherhood studies from a comparative perspective. Her Ph.D. dissertation title is 'Official Discourse on Chinese Fatherhood since Mao era'. Ms. Tan holds a master degree in mental health education from Beijing Normal University (China). She has separately done exchange studies at University of Hohenheim (Germany) for the 2016-17 academic year, at Yeungnam University (South Korea) for the 2012-13 academic year, and at National Pingtung University (Taiwan) for the 2010-11 spring semester. As a visiting scholar, Ms. Tan has separately run cooperative research projects at University of Chicago (USA) for the 2018-19 summer semester, at University of Helsinki (Finland) for the 2017-18 winter semester, and at Stockholm University (Sweden) for the 2016-17 academic year. Up to date, she has already published one book chapter in Routledge and fourteen papers about fatherhood research on the renowned international journals and international conference proceedings.

 

References

Abbott, D. A., Ming, Z. F. & Meredith, W. H. (1992). An evolving redefinition of the fatherhood role in the People's Republic of China. International Journal of Sociology of the family, 45-54.

Google Scholar Crossref

Anderson, E. (2009). Inclusive masculinity: The changing nature of masculinities. London: Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Cao, S. & Lin, X. (2019). Masculinizing fatherhood: Negotiation of Yang and Jiao among young fathers in China. Journal of Gender Studies, 1-11.

Google Scholar Crossref

Chong, G. P. L. (2013). Chinese bodies that matter: The search for masculinity and femininity. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 30(3), 242-266.

Google Scholar Crossref

Connell, R. (2012). Masculinity and Social Change. Hipatia Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Davis, D. S., & Harrell, S. (Eds.). (1993). Chinese families in the post-Mao era (Vol. 17). University of California Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Feng X.T. (1996). The changing image of female-an analysis of ‘Women of China’. Nanjing Social Journal, pp.13-18.

Google Scholar Crossref

Fincher, L. H. (2016). Leftover women: The resurgence of gender inequality in China. Zed Books Ltd..

Google Scholar Crossref

Fong, M. (2017). One child:life, love and parenthood in modern China. One world Publications.

Google Scholar Crossref

Heng, G., & D. Janadas. (1995). ‘State Fatherhood: The Politics of Nationalism, Sexuality, and Race in Singapore.’ In Bewitching Women, Pious Men: Gender and Body Politics in Southeast Asia, edited by A. Ong and Michael G. Peletz, 145–159. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA:University of California Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ho, D. Y. F. (1987). Fatherhood in Chinese culture. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The father's role: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 227-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hong, X. (2013). Social stratification and childrearing values in contemporary China. In International handbook of Chinese families (pp. 277-287). Springer New York.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hu, L. (2018). Is masculinity ‘deteriorating’ in China? Changes of masculinity representation in Chinese film posters from 1951 to 2016. Journal of Gender Studies, 27(3), 335-346.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hulei, E., Zevenbergen, A. A., & Jacobs, S. C. (2006). Discipline behaviors of Chinese American and European American mothers. Journal of Psychology, 140, 459-475.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ishii-Kuntz, M. (2015). Fatherhood in Asian contexts. Routledge handbook of families in Asia, 161-174.

Google Scholar Crossref

Jiang Z.L. (1994). After my son has grown up. Women of China News.pp.33-34

Google Scholar Crossref

Kang K.Q. (1982). Marriage and Family Work with Children. ACWF press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Li, X. (2018). Chinese fathers in the 20th century: Changing roles as parents and as men. Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 26(4), 1-18.

Google Scholar Crossref

Liong, M. (2017). Chinese fatherhood, gender and family: Father mission. Springer.

Google Scholar Crossref

Louie, K. (2014). Chinese masculinity studies in the twenty-first century: Westernizing, Easternizing and globalizing wen and wu. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies, 9(1), 18-29.

Google Scholar Crossref

Molenda-Kostanski, Z. (2016). Asian American Men and Fatherhood: Relationship between Acculturation, Gender-Role Conflict, Parenting Self-Efficacy, and Father Involvement. Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses.

Google Scholar Crossref

O'Brien, M. (2009). Fathers, parental leave policies, and infant quality of life: International perspectives and policy impact. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 624(1), 190-213.

Google Scholar Crossref

Seward, R. R., & Stanley-Stevens, L. (2014). Fathers, fathering, and fatherhood across cultures. In Parenting across Cultures (pp. 459-474). Springer, Dordrecht.

Google Scholar Crossref

Shek, D. T. (1998). Adolescents' perceptions of paternal and maternal parenting styles in a Chinese context. The Journal of Psychology, 132(5), 527-537.

Google Scholar Crossref

Silverstein, L. B. (1996). Fathering is a feminist issue. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20(1), 3-37.

Google Scholar Crossref

Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing Patriarchy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Google Scholar Crossref

Wang L. (1989). The criteria of fathering. Parenting Science. p.17

Google Scholar Crossref

Wang X. (2017). Father needs to hold up half of the sky in the family. The Family of China. pp. 10-12

Google Scholar Crossref

Wang Z. (2010). Creating the socialist feminism-an analysis of ‘Women of China’ (1949-1966). Nanjing University Journal.pp.58-75.

Google Scholar Crossref

Xie, Y. (2013). Gender and family in contemporary China. University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research, 1-10.

Google Scholar Crossref

Xu, Q. (2017). Fatherhood, Adolescence and Gender in Chinese Families. Springer.

Google Scholar Crossref

Yan, Y. (2003). Private life under socialism: Love, intimacy, and family change in a Chinese village, 1949-1999. Stanford University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Yang, J. (2010). The crisis of masculinity: Class, gender, and kindly power in postâ€Mao China. American Ethnologist, 37(3), 550-562.

Google Scholar Crossref

Yuan L.L. (1997). Dialogues in a family. Women of China.pp.18-19.

Google Scholar Crossref

Downloads

Published

2020-06-21

Almetric

Dimensions

How to Cite

Tan, T. (2020). Official Discourse on Family and Fatherhood in Post-1949 China. Masculinities &Amp; Social Change, 9(2), 174–206. https://doi.org/10.17583/mcs.2020.4943

Issue

Section

Articles