Communicative acts which promote new masculinities. Overcoming hegemonic masculinity in the workplace and the school


  • David Portell Universidad de Barcelona
  • Cristina Pulido Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona



communicative acts, new masculinities, attraction, hegemonic masculinity


Scientific literature has emphasized how the reproduction of hegemonicmasculinity has led to several social problems, such as gender violence,criminality or bullying (Connell 1987, 2005, 2006; Kimmel 2000,Messerschimdt, 1993, Bourdieu 1998). There are several findings about theinfluence of this model in cases of sexual harassment suffered by women in theworkplace(Mackinnon, 1979; Thomas & Kitzinger1997; Wise & Stanley1987) as well as hegemonic masculinity and homophobia at the school (Mac anGhaill 2007). In this article we will present evidence on both issues but also onovercoming process derived from the research project entitled Impact ofcommunicative acts on the construction of new masculinities funded by theSpanish Ministry of Science and Innovation. The research illustrates theinfluence of communicative acts on the promotion of new masculinities, farremoved from the hegemonic one, which are based on values like equality andsolidarity. We will present some data about how specific communicative actscan favour the recognition and visibility of new masculinities in the workplaceand the School, specifically in a Small and MediumsizedEnterprise, an AdultEducation centre and a Vocational School.


Download data is not yet available.


Austin, J. (1971). How to do things with Words: The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon.

Bourdieu, P. (1998). La domination masculine. Paris: Editions de Seuil Beavouir, S. (1949). La deuxième sexe. París: Gallimard.

Connell, R. W. (1983). Which way is up? Essays on sex, class and

culture. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

Connell, R. W.(1987). Gender and power. Sydney: Allen and Unwin. Connell, R. W. (2005). Globalization, imperialism, and masculinities.

En Handbook of studies on men & masculinities. Thousand Oaks,

CA: Sage.

CREA­UB. (2011). Impacto de los actos comunicativos en la

construcción de nuevas masculinidades. [Impact of communicative acts on the construction of new masculinities] Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation.

Duque, E. (2006). Aprendiendo para el amor o para la violencia. Las relaciones en las discotecas. [Learning to love or to violence. Relationships in nightclubs]. Barcelona:El Roure.

Flecha, R. & Soler, M. (2010). From Austin's speech acts to communicative acts: Perspectives from Searle, Habermas and CREA. SIGNOS, 43 (2), 363­375.

Flood. M. (1995). Three principles for men. XY:men, sex, politics.

Giddens, A. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Gilmore, D. (1991). Manhood in the making. Cultural concepts of masculinity. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Gómez, J. (2004). El amor en la sociedad del riesgo. Una tentativa educativa.[Love in the risk society: An educational proposal] Barcelona: El Roure.

Gómez, A.; Flecha, R.; Puigvert, L. (2011). Critical Communicative Methodology: Informing real social Transformation through research. Qualitative Inquiry. 17 (3), 235­245.

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: Columbia university Press. .

MCS – Masculinity and social change 1(1), 61­80 79

Kaufman, M. (2001). Building a movement of men working to end violence against women. Development; 44, (3), 9­14.

Kessler, S; Ashenden, D.J.; Connell, R.W; Dowset, G.W. (1985). Gender relations in a secondary schooling. Sociology of education; 58, January, 34­48.

Kimmel, M. (1996). Manhood in America: a cultural history. New York: Free Press.

Kimmel, M. (2000). The Gendered society. New York: Oxford University Press.

Klein, J. (2006). An invisible problem: Everyday violence against girls in schools. Theoretical Criminology; 10; 147 DOI: 10.1177/1362480606063136.

Korobov, N; Thorne, A. (2006). Intimacy and Distancing: Young Men’s Conversations About Romantic Relationships. Journal of Adolescent Research; 21; 27 DOI:10.1177/0743558405284035.

Mackinoon, C. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the State. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.

Mac and Ghaill, MM. (1994). The Making of Men: Masculinities, Sexualities and Schooling. Buckingham: Open University Press. McDowell, L (2001). Men, management and multiple masculinities in

organisations. Geoforum; 32 (2) 181­198.

Messerschmidt, J. W. (1993). Masculinities and crime: Critique and

reconceptualization of theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman &


Searle, J; Soler, M (Eds.) (2004). Lenguaje y ciencias sociales. Diálogo

entre John Searle y Crea. [Language and Social Sciences.

Dialogue between John Searle and CREA] Barcelona: El Roure. Seidler, VJ. (1994). Unreasonable Men­ Masculinity and Social Theory.

London: Routledge.

Spitzack, C. (1998). Theorizing Masculinity Across the Field: An

lntradisciplinary Conversation. Communication Theory, 8 (2) 141­

Stobbe, L. (2005). Doing Machismo: Legitimating Speech Acts as a

Selection Discourse. Gender, Work & Organization, 12 (2) 105–123.

Portell & Pulido ­ Communicative acts and new masculinities

Valls, R.; Puigvert, L; Duque, E. (2008). Gender Violence amongst teenagers: socialization and prevention. Violence against women; 14 (7), 759­785.

Wise, S. & Stanley, L. (1987). Georgie Porgie: Sexual Harassment in Everyday Life. Kitchner, Ontario: Pandora Press.




How to Cite

Portell, D., & Pulido, C. (2012). Communicative acts which promote new masculinities. Overcoming hegemonic masculinity in the workplace and the school. Masculinities &Amp; Social Change, 1(1), 61–80.