Bullying, Cheating, Deceiving: Teachers’ Perception of Deceitful Situations at School

Authors

  • Tamara Marksteiner University of Mannheim School of Social Sciences Department of Psychology
  • Marc-André Reinhard University of Mannheim School of Social Sciences Department of Psychology
  • Florian Lettau University of Mannheim School of Social Sciences Department of Psychology
  • Oliver Dickhäuser University of Mannheim School of Social Sciences Department of Psychology

https://doi.org/10.4471/ijep.2013.24

Keywords:


Downloads

Abstract

Two studies investigated in which situations teachers (would) investigate whether a student was lying or telling the truth and how these situations were perceived. Results of Study 1 indicate that teachers (would) interview students when it comes to use of unfair means, aggressive behavior, theft, absence without permission, bullying, and vandalism, whereat deceitful situations with rather light consequences were most frequently described. Moreover, participants perceived the frequency of occurrence of all situations as lower for themselves compared to colleagues. In both studies, the use of unfair means, absence without permission, and bullying (over a longer period) were rated as most frequently occurring in everyday school life. Further, deception detection was perceived as being mostly important in situations with severe consequences. Study 2 also demonstrates that situations with light consequences are perceived as situations where it is of relatively less importance to make accurate judgments, avoid wrongful accusation, and detect misbehavior, as compared with situations with severe consequences. Overall, teachers perceive avoiding wrong accusation as more important than detecting misbehavior. Influences of teachers’ perceptions on their behavior are discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D. & Akert, R. M. (2008). Sozialpsychologie [Social Psychology] (4th Edition). München: Pearson.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Heidelberg: Springer.

Google Scholar Crossref

Baier, D., Pfeiffer, C., Simonson, J., & Rabold, S. (2009). Jugendliche in Deutschland als Opfer und Täter von Gewalt: Erster Forschungsbericht zum gemeinsamen Forschungsprojekt des Bundesministeriums des Innern und des KFN (KFN Forschungsbericht Nr. 107) [German adolescents as victims and actors of violence: First research report of the corporate research project of the Ministry of the Interior and the Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony]. Hannover: Kriminologisches Forschungsinstitut Niedersachsen.

Google Scholar Crossref

Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73-96). New York: Guilford Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Cozby, P. C. (2009). Methods of behavioural research. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Google Scholar Crossref

Franklyn-Stokes, A., Newstead, S. E. (1995). Undergraduate Cheating: Who does what and why? Studies in Higher Education, 20, 159-172. doi:10.1080/03075079512331381673

Google Scholar Crossref

Gebauer, K. (2009). Mobbing in der Schule [Bullying in school]. Weinheim: Beltz.

Google Scholar Crossref

Huisken, F. (2007). Über die Unregierbarkeit des Schulvolks: Rütli-Schulen, Erfurt usw. [On the ungovernability of schools: Rütli-Schools, Erfurt etc.]. Hamburg: VSA-Verlag.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kassin, S., Fein, S., & Markus, H. R. (2011). Social Psychology, 8th Edition. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing. .

Google Scholar Crossref

Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480

Google Scholar Crossref

Kunda, Z. (1999). Social Cognition: Making Sense of People. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental decision. New York: Plenum.

Google Scholar Crossref

McAllister, H. A. (1996). Self-serving bias in the classroom: Who shows it? Who knows it? Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 123-131.

Google Scholar Crossref

Reinhard, M.-A., Dickhäuser, O., Marksteiner, T., & Sporer, S. L. (2011). The case of Pinocchio: Teachers' ability to detect deception. Social Psychology of Education, 14, 299-318.

Google Scholar Crossref

Reinhard, M.-A., Marksteiner, T. & Dickhäuser, O. (2011). [Perceived seriousness of different types of errors in lie detection]. Unpublished data.

Google Scholar Crossref

Rigby, K. (2003). Consequences of bullying in schools. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48, 583-90.

Google Scholar Crossref

Shrum, L. J., & O’Guinn, T. (1993). Processes and effects in the construction of social reality: Construct accessibility as an explanatory variable. Communication Research, 20, 436-471.

Google Scholar Crossref

Tiefenbacher, A. (2008). Mobbing [Bullying]. München: Compact Verlag.

Google Scholar Crossref

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9

Google Scholar Crossref

Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester, England: Wiley.

Google Scholar Crossref

Wawrzitz, N. (2011). Neue Medien und Gewalt an Schulen [New media and violence in schools]. München: Grin.

Google Scholar Crossref

Downloads

Published

2013-06-24
Logo Metrics

Almetric

Dimensions

How to Cite

Marksteiner, T., Reinhard, M.-A., Lettau, F., & Dickhäuser, O. (2013). Bullying, Cheating, Deceiving: Teachers’ Perception of Deceitful Situations at School. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 2(2), 193–220. https://doi.org/10.4471/ijep.2013.24

Issue

Section

Articles