Conceptual Change in Science Teaching and Learning: Introducing the Dynamic Model of Conceptual Change

Louis S. Nadelson, Benjamin C. Heddy, Suzanne Jones, Gita Taasoobshirazi, Marcus Johnson

Abstract


Conceptual change can be a challenging process, particularly in science education where many of the concepts are complex, controversial, or counter-intuitive.  Yet, conceptual change is fundamental to science learning, which suggests science educators and science education researchers need models to effectively address and investigate conceptual change.  Consideration of the current research and extant models of conceptual change reflect a need for a holistic, comprehensive, and dynamic model of conceptual change.  In response, we developed the Dynamic Model of Conceptual Change (DMCC), which uses multiple lines of research that explore the variables influencing conceptual change and the dynamic interactions that take place during the conceptual change process in science teaching and learning.  Unique to the DMCC is the potential for iterations, regression, enter and exit points at various stages of the conceptual change process, and the influences of message recognition, message engagement and processing, and the nature of the resulting conceptual change.  The DMCC contains elements from extant models along with previously un-emphasized influential conceptual change variables such as culture, society, attitude, practices, and personal epistemology.  We constructed the DMCC to provide science educators and researchers a more holistic framework for exploring conceptual change in science instruction and learning.


Keywords


Conceptual Change, Dynamic, Open System, Science Teaching and Learning

Full Text:

PDF PDF

References


Authors (2010)

Authors (2010)

Authors (2010)

Authors (2010)

Authors (2011)

Authors (2011)

Authors (2013)

Authors (2013)

Authors (2013)

Authors (2014)

Authors (2015)

Authors (2015)

Authors (2016)

Authors (2016)

Authors (in press)

Ariasi, N., & Mason, L. (2014). From covert processes to overt outcomes of refutation text reading: The interplay of science text structure and working memory capacity through eye fixations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(3), 493-523.

Beeth, M. E. (1993). Classroom environment and conceptual change instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA.

Beeth, M. E., & Hewson, P. W. (1999). Learning goals in an exemplary science teacher's practice: Cognitive and social factors in teaching for conceptual change. Science Education, 83(6), 738-760.

Bell P., & Linn, M. C., (2002). Beliefs about science: How does science instruction contribute? In B. K. Hofer & P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal Epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing, 321-346. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Brehmer, B. (1992). Dynamic decision making: Human control of complex systems. Acta psychologica, 81(3), 211-241.

Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.

Brown, T. D., & Vescovi, J. D. (2012). Maximum speed: Misconceptions of sprinting. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 34(2), 37-41.

Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation and categorical shift. In S.Vosniadou (Ed.), Handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Change in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 186-204.

Costa, V. B. (1995). When science is “another world”: Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science. Science Education, 79(3), 313-333.

DiSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and instruction, 10(2-3), 105-225.

Dole, J.A., & Sinatra, G.M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33, 109.

Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (GRIT–S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166-174.

Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.) Handbook of research on student engagement, pp. 97-131. New York: Springer.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.

Garrison, J. W., & Bentley, M. L. (1990). Science education, conceptual change and breaking with everyday experience. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 10(1), 19-35.

Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106-116.

Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-process model of teachers’ cognition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 147-180.

Greene, B. A., Miller, R. B., Crowson, M., Duke, B. L., & Akey, K. L. (2004). Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 462–482.

Kelly, G. J., & Green, J. (1998). The social nature of knowing: toward a sociocultural perspective on conceptual change and knowledge construction. In B. Guzzetti, & C. Hynd, Perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 145–182). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hardy, K. R. (1957). Determinants of conformity and attitude change. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 54(3), 289.

Hewson, P. W., & Thorley, N. R. (1989). The conditions of conceptual change in the classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 541-553.

Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378-405.

Hofer, B. K., & Pintritch, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88-140. Doi:10.3102/00346543067001088.

Hynd, C. (2003). Conceptual change in response to persuasive messages. In G. M. Sinatra & P.

R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 1-18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hynd, C. (2001). Refutational texts and the change process. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 699-714.

Hynd, C., Alvermann, D., & Qian, G. (1997). Preservice elementary school teachers' conceptual change about projectile motion: Refutation text, demonstration, affective factors, and relevance. Science Education, 81(1), 1-27.

Jones, M. G., Howe, A., & Rua, M. J. (2000). Gender differences in students' experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science education, 84(2), 180-192.

Kelly, G.J. & Green, J. (1998). The social nature of knowing: toward a sociocultural perspective on conceptual change and knowledge construction, in Guzzetti, B and Hynd, C. (Eds), Perspectives on conceptual change: multiple ways to understand knowing and learning in a complex world (pp. 145-182). New York, NY: Routledge.

Kendeou, P., Braasch, J. L., & Bråten, I. (2015). Optimizing conditions for learning: Situating refutations in epistemic cognition. The Journal of Experimental Education, 1-19.

Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2005). The effects of readers’ misconceptions on comprehension of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 235-245.

Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1567-1577.

Kendeou, P. Walsh, E., Smith, E. R., & O’Brien, E. J. (2014). Knowledge revision processes in refutation texts. Discourse Processes, 51, 374-397.

Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 551-578.

Kuhle, B. X., Barber, J. M., & Bristol, A. S. (2009). Predicting students' performance in introductory psychology from their psychology misconceptions. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 36(2), 119.

Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15, 309-328. Doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(00)00030-7.

Kuncar, H. N., & Breigheith, M. (2002). Misconceptions in mathematics. Mathematics And Mathematics Education (pp. 122-134).

Laukenmann, M., Bleicher, M., Fuß, S., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Mayring, P., & von Rhöneck, C. (2003). An investigation of the influence of emotional factors on learning in physics instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 25(4), 489-507.

Lavigne, G. L., Vallerand, R. J., & Miquelon, P. (2007). A motivational model of persistence in science education: A self-determination theory approach. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(3), 351-369.

Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J., Ruscio, J., & Beyerstein, B. L. (2010). 50 great myths of popular psychology: Shattering widespread misconceptions about human behavior. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.

Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of motivational beliefs in conceptual change. In M. Limon & L. Mason’s “Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice.” Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Limón, M. (2002). Conceptual change in history. In M. Limón, & L. Mason (Eds.) Reconsidering conceptual change. Issues in theory and practice (pp. 259–289). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Lombardi, D., & Sinatra, G. M. (2012). College students’ perceptions about the plausibility of human-induced climate change. Research in Science Education, 42(2), 201-217.

Manini, T. M., Druger, M., & Ploutz-Snyder, L. (2005). Misconceptions about strength exercise among older adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 13(4), 422-433.

Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2009). Academic resilience and academic buoyancy: Multidimensional and hierarchical conceptual framing of causes, correlates and cognate constructs. Oxford Review of Education, 35(3), 353-370.

Mason, L. & Gava, M. (2007). Effects of epistemological beliefs and learning text structure on conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou, A. Baltas, & X. Vamvakoussi (Eds.), Reframing the problem of conceptual change in learning and instruction. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.

Mason, L., Gava, M., & Boldrin, A. (2008). On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 291.

McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22(3), 247-288.

Miller, R. B., Greene, B. A., Montalvo, G. P., Ravindran, B., & Nichols, J. D. (1996). Engagement in academic work: The role of learning goals, future consequences, pleasing others, and perceived ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(4), 388-422.

Moje, E., & Shepardson, D. (1998). Social interactions and children’s changing understanding of electric circuits: Exploring unequal power relations in “peer”-learning groups. In B. Guzzetti & C. Hynd (Eds.), Perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 225–234). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Murphy, P. K. (2007). The Eye of the Beholder: The Interplay of Social and Cognitive Components in Change. Educational Psychologist, 42(1), 41-53. doi:10.1080/00461520701190504

Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 3-53.

Ohlsson, S. (2009). Resubsumption: A possible mechanism for conceptual change and belief revision. Educational Psychologist, 44(1), 20-40.

Patrick, H., & Pintrich, P. R. (2001). Conceptual change in teachers’ intuitive conceptions of learning, motivation, and instruction: The role of motivational and epistemological beliefs. Understanding and teaching the intuitive mind: Student and teacher learning, 117-143.

Pekrun, R. (1992). The impact of emotions on learning and achievement: Towards a theory of cognitive/motivational mediators. Applied Psychology, 41(4), 359-376.

Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36-48.

Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wiley (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259-282). New York: Springer.

Pekrun, R., & Perry, R. P. (2014). Control-value theory of achievement emotions. In R Pekrun, & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 120-141). New York: Taylor and Francis.

Pekrun. R., & Stephens, E. J., (2012). Academic emotions. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, S. Graham, J. M. Royer, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, (Vol. 2, pp. 3-31). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2015). Emotion and persuasion: Cognitive and meta-cognitive processes impact attitudes. Cognition and Emotion, 29(1), 1-26.

Petty, R., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2012). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer Science & Business Media.

Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(5), 847.

Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget's theory. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 703-732). New York: Wiley.

Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167-199.

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., García, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801-813.

Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W., & Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.

Rueda, R. (2010). 5 Cultural Perspectives in Reading. Handbook of reading research, 4, 84.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Self-determination theory and the role of basic psychological needs in personality and the organization of behavior. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 654–678). New York: Guilford Press.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). Promoting self-determined school engagement. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 171–195). New York: Routledge.

Qian, G. & Alvermann, D. E. (2000). Relationship between epistemological beliefs and conceptual change learning. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 16(1), 59-74.

Qian, G., & Alverman, D. (1995). The role of epistemological beliefs and learned helplessness in secondary school students’ learning science concepts from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 282-292

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macro-theory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49, 182–185.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). Promoting self-determined school engagement. Handbook of Motivation at School, 171-195.

Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., and Dunkle, M. E. (2002). Development and validation of the Epistemic Belief Inventory (EBI). In Hofer, B. K., and Pintrich, P. R. (eds.), Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing, Erlbaum,Mahwah, NJ.

Shirey, L. L., & Reynolds, R. E. (1988). Effect of interest on attention and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 159.

Shtulman, A. (2009). Rethinking the role of resubsumption in conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 44(1), 41-47.

Shtulman, A., & Lombrozo, T. (2015) Bundles of contradiction: A coexistence view of conceptual change. In D. Barner & A. Baron (Eds.) Core knowledge and conceptual change. NY: Oxford University Press.

Sinatra, G. M. (2005). The" warming trend" in conceptual change research: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 107-115.

Sinatra, G. M., Kienhues, D., Hofer, B. K. (2014). Addressing challenges to public understanding of science: Epistemic cognition, motivated reasoning, and conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 123-138. Doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.916216.

Smith III, J. P., Disessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1994). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115-163.

Strike, K.A., & Posner, G.J. (1992). A Revisionist Theory of Conceptual Change. In R.A. Dushl & R.J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and Practice (pp. 147-176). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Van Den Broek, P., & Kendeou, P. (2008). Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: The role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 335-351.

Van Den Broek, P., Youg, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (1999). The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the onine construction of a memory representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71-98). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45-69.

Weaver, G. C. (1998). Strategies in K‐12 science instruction to promote conceptual change. Science Education, 82(4), 455-472.

Windschitl, M. A. (1995). Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: The roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs.

Windschitl, M., & Andre, T. (1998). Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: The roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 145-160.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2018.3349

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



International Journal of Educational Psychology - IJEP | ISSN: 2014-3591

Legal Deposit: B.34286-2012 | https://ijep.hipatiapress.com | ijep@hipatiapress.com