Student Engagement Variations across Institutions and Disciplines: Findings from Azerbaijan
Keywords:
Abstract
Although student engagement has been a widely researched area known to improve student learning and a topic of scholarly debate for many decades now, this has yet to be the case in Azerbaijan. Data from the National Survey of Student Engagement, conducted among 433 undergraduate students of the 18-23 age range (M = 21.37, SD = 1.43) at eight universities in Azerbaijan, allowed us to examine variations in the conditions meant to foster student engagement, as well as students’ perspectives on improving their educational experiences. Specifically, we looked at differences related to academic challenges, learning with peers, teacher experiences, and campus environment. Student engagement varied across disciplines. Small universities in the capital city provided better collaborative learning conditions. However, students at regional universities were more satisfied with the quality of student-faculty interactions. Nonetheless, students saw a strong need for fundamental changes in higher education in Azerbaijan, focusing on improving the quality of teachers, teaching and the curriculum. The study provided an overview of student engagement variations across institutions and disciplines and how students conceptualise necessary improvements in student experiences. Institutional leaders must understand the variations for seeking essential changes in the HE system to effectively accommodate students’ needs and expectations.
Downloads
References
Ahn, M. Y., & Davis, H. D. (2020). Four domains of students’ sense of belonging to university. Studies in Higher Education, 45(3), 622–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1564902
Google Scholar CrossrefArum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011a). Are undergraduates actually learning anything. Chronicle of Higher Education, 57(21), A30–31.
Google Scholar CrossrefAshwin, P. (2020). Transforming university education: A manifesto (1st ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Google Scholar CrossrefAstin, A. W. (1977). Four critical years. Effects of college on beliefs, attitudes, and knowledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefBaron, P., & Corbin, L. (2012). Student engagement: Rhetoric and reality. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6), 759–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.655711
Google Scholar CrossrefBowden, J. L.-H., Tickle, L., & Naumann, K. (2021). The four pillars of tertiary student engagement and success: A holistic measurement approach. Studies in Higher Education, 46(6), 1207–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672647
Google Scholar CrossrefBowen, H. R. (1996). Investment in learning: the individual and social value of American higher education. Transaction Publishers.
Google Scholar CrossrefBrint, S., & Cantwell, A. M. (2014). Conceptualizing, measuring, and analyzing the characteristics of academically disengaged students: results from UCUES 2010. Journal of College Student Development, 55(8), 808–823. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2014.0080
Google Scholar CrossrefBryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877
Google Scholar CrossrefCarey, P. (2018). The impact of institutional culture, policy and process on student engagement in university decision-making. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 22(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2016.1168754
Google Scholar CrossrefCarini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: testing the linkages*. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
Google Scholar CrossrefCoates, H. (2005). The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 11(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320500074915
Google Scholar CrossrefCohen, J. (1988). Edition 2. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum.
Google Scholar CrossrefCohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed). Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefCook‐Sather, A. (2009). From traditional accountability to shared responsibility: the benefits and challenges of student consultants gathering midcourse feedback in college classrooms. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801956042
Google Scholar CrossrefCownie, F., & Gallo, M. (2021). Alumni gratitude and academics: implications for engagement. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(6), 788–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1820457
Google Scholar CrossrefCreswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefCreswell, J. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefCreswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed). Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefDahlvig, C. A., Dahlvig, J. E., & Chatriand, C. M. (2020). Institutional expenditures and student graduation and retention. Christian Higher Education, 19(5), 352–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/15363759.2020.1712561
Google Scholar CrossrefDalmon, D. L., Fonseca, I., Pondé Avena, C., Carnoy, M., & Khavenson, T. (2019). Do students make greater achievement gains in some higher education institutions’ programs than others? Insights from Brazil. Higher Education, 78(5), 887–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00376-6
Google Scholar CrossrefDrezner, N. D., Pizmony-Levy, O., & Anderson-Long, M. (2020). In “Alma Mater” we trust? Exploring attitudes toward institutions and alumni giving. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 122(9), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012200907
Google Scholar CrossrefDužević, I., Mikulić, J., & Baković, T. (2018). An extended framework for analysing higher education performance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 29(5–6), 599–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2016.1224083
Google Scholar CrossrefEagle, L., & Brennan, R. (2007). Are students customers? TQM and marketing perspectives. Quality Assurance in Education, 15(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880710723025
Google Scholar CrossrefFetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving Integration in Mixed Methods Designs—Principles and Practices. Health Services Research, 48(6pt2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
Google Scholar CrossrefField, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefFosnacht, K, Gonyea, R. M., & Graham, P. A. (2020). The relationship of first-year residence hall roommate assignment policy with interactional diversity and perceptions of the campus environment. The Journal of Higher Education, 91(5), 781–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2019.1689483
Google Scholar CrossrefFredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Google Scholar CrossrefGallo, M. (2012). Beyond Philanthropy: Recognising the value of alumni to benefit higher education institutions. Tertiary Education and Management, 18(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2011.611892
Google Scholar CrossrefGansemer-Topf, A. M., & Schuh, J. H. (2006). Institutional selectivity and institutional expenditures: examining organizational factors that contribute to retention and graduation. Research in Higher Education, 47(6), 613–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9009-4
Google Scholar CrossrefGibbs, P., Grdzelidze, I., & Tavadze, G. (2023). Quality assurance of higher education in the South Caucasus. Quality in Higher Education, 29(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2022.2100598
Google Scholar CrossrefGreene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry (1. ed). Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar CrossrefGreene, J. C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807309969
Google Scholar CrossrefGunuc, S., Artun, H., Yigit, E., & Keser, H. (2022). Examining the relationship between student engagement and campus climate: a case in Turkey. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 23(4), 1099–1119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025119894579
Google Scholar CrossrefHasanov, Z., Antoniou, P., Suleymanov, E., & Garayev, V. (2021). The impact of behavioural, cognitive and emotional dimensions of student engagement on student learning: The case of Azerbaijani higher education institutions. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 14(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKL.2021.115027
Google Scholar CrossrefIsaeva, R., & Aliyev, R. (2023). Excellence in teaching at Azerbaijani universities: a conceptualisation. Quality in Higher Education 29(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2022.2100613
Google Scholar CrossrefIsaeva, R., Eisenschmidt, E., Vanari, K., & Kumpas-Lenk, K. (2020). Students’ views on dialogue: improving student engagement in the quality assurance process. Quality in Higher Education, 26(1), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2020.1729307
Google Scholar CrossrefIsaeva, R., Ratinen, I., & Uusiautti, S. (2023). Understanding student success in higher education in Azerbaijan: the role of student engagement. Studies in Higher Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2217208
Google Scholar CrossrefIsakhanli, H., & Pashayeva, A. (2018). Higher education transformation, institutional diversity and typology of higher education institutions in Azerbaijan. In J. Huisman, A. Smolentseva, & I. Froumin (Eds.), 25 years of transformations of higher education systems in post-Soviet countries (pp. 97–121). Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52980-6_4
Google Scholar CrossrefKahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
Google Scholar CrossrefKezar, A. J., & Kinzie, J. L. (2006). Examining the ways institutions create student engagement: the role of mission. Journal of College Student Development, 47(2), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2006.0018
Google Scholar CrossrefKrause, K.‐L., & Coates, H. (2008). Students’ engagement in first‐year university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701698892
Google Scholar CrossrefKuh, G. D. (2001). The national survey of student engagement: conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties.
Google Scholar CrossrefKuh, G. D., & Documenting Effective Educational Practice (Project) (Eds.) (2010). Student success in college: creating conditions that matter. Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar CrossrefKuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772116
Google Scholar CrossrefLeach, L. (2016). Enhancing student engagement in one institution. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2013.869565
Google Scholar CrossrefLester, J., Brown Leonard, J., & Mathias, D. (2013). Transfer student engagement: blurring of social and academic engagement. Community College Review, 41(3), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552113496141
Google Scholar CrossrefLiang, X., Su, Y., & Shang, W. (2022). Prior campus experience and alumni donation: a cross-cultural study of China and the USA. Higher Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00948-z
Google Scholar CrossrefLizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2009). Student participation in university governance: The role conceptions and sense of efficacy of student representatives on departmental committees. Studies in Higher Education, 34(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802602000
Google Scholar CrossrefLocke, W. (2014). The intensification of rankings logic in an increasingly marketised higher education environment. European Journal of Education, 49(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12060
Google Scholar CrossrefMammadova, L., & Valiyev, A. (2020). Azerbaijan and European Higher Education Area: students’ involvement in bologna reforms. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.30828/real/2020.4.4
Google Scholar CrossrefMarginson, S. (2013). The impossibility of capitalist markets in higher education. Journal of Education Policy, 28(3), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2012.747109
Google Scholar CrossrefMayhew, M. J., Rockenbach, A. N., Bowman, N. A., Seifert, T. A. D., & Wolniak, G. C. (2016). How college affects students: 21st century evidence that higher education works. Vol. 1. John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar CrossrefMayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173
Google Scholar CrossrefMcCormick, A. C., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2013). Student engagement: bridging research and practice to improve the quality of undergraduate education. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: handbook of theory and research (pp. 47–92). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5836-0_2
Google Scholar CrossrefNelson Laird, T. F., Seifert, T. A., Pascarella, E. T., Mayhew, M. J., & Blaich, C. F. (2014). Deeply Affecting First-Year Students’ Thinking: Deep Approaches to Learning and Three Dimensions of Cognitive Development. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(3), 402–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2014.11777333
Google Scholar CrossrefOleksiyenko, A. V. (2023). De-Sovietisation of Georgian higher education: deconstructing unfreedom. Quality in Higher Education, 29(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2022.2100599
Google Scholar CrossrefOnwuegbuzie, A. J., & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, 2(1), 397–430.
Google Scholar CrossrefPascarella, E. T., Seifert, T. A., & Blaich, C. (2010). How effective are the NSSE benchmarks in predicting important educational outcomes? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380903449060
Google Scholar CrossrefPedro, I. H., & Andraz, J. M. (2021). Alumni Commitment in Higher Education Institutions: Determinants and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 33(1), 29–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2019.1656138
Google Scholar CrossrefPedro, I. M., Da Costa Mendes, J., & Nobre Pereira, L. (2020). Identifying patterns of alumni commitment in key strategic relationship programmes. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 17(4), 445–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-020-00256-1
Google Scholar CrossrefPike, G. R. (2013). NSSE benchmarks and institutional outcomes: a note on the importance of considering the intended uses of a measure in validity studies. Research in Higher Education, 54(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9279-y
Google Scholar CrossrefPike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., & McCormick, A. C. (2011). An investigation of the contingent relationships between learning community participation and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 52(3), 300–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9192-1
Google Scholar CrossrefPike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., McCormick, A. C., Ethington, C. A., & Smart, J. C. (2011). If and when money matters: the relationships among educational expenditures, student engagement and students’ learning outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 52(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9183-2
Google Scholar CrossrefPike, G. R., Smart, J. C., Kuh, G. D., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). Educational expenditures and student engagement: when does money matter? Research in Higher Education, 47(7), 847–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9018-3
Google Scholar CrossrefPlano Clark, V. L., & Creswell, J. W. (Eds.). (2008). The mixed methods reader. Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefPusser, B., & Marginson, S. (2013). University rankings in critical perspective. The Journal of Higher Education, 84(4), 544–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2013.11777301
Google Scholar CrossrefRau, N. E., & Erwin, T. D. (2015). Using student engagement to predict alumni donors. Journal of Nonprofit Education & Leadership, 5(2).
Google Scholar CrossrefRocconi, L. M., Liu, X., & Pike, G. R. (2020). The impact of person-environment fit on grades, perceived gains, and satisfaction: An application of Holland’s theory. Higher Education, 80(5), 857–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00519-0
Google Scholar CrossrefRyan, J. F. (2005). Institutional expenditures and student engagement: A role for financial resources in enhancing student learning and development? Research in Higher Education, 46, 235–249. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1007/s 11162-004-1601-x
Google Scholar CrossrefSainz Sujet, P.. (2022). Do institutions matter in student engagement? A comparison in engagement between two universities in different contexts. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 21(3), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/15381927211052712
Google Scholar CrossrefShan, Y. (2022). Philosophical foundations of mixed methods research. Philosophy Compass, 17(1), e12804. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12804
Google Scholar CrossrefTashakkori, A., Johnson, B., & Teddlie, C. (2021). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences (Second Edition). Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefTinto, V. (2023). Reflections: Rethinking Engagement and Student Persistence. Student Success, 14(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.3016
Google Scholar CrossrefTomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms. ASCD.
Google Scholar CrossrefTrowler, P., & Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement evidence summary. The Higher Education Academy, 11(1), 1-15.
Google Scholar CrossrefTrowler, V., Allan, R. L., Bryk, J., & Din, R. R. (2022). Pathways to student engagement: beyond triggers and mechanisms at the engagement interface. Higher Education, 84(4), 761–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00798-1
Google Scholar CrossrefWilson, D., Jones, D., Bocell, F., Crawford, J., Kim, M. J., Veilleux, N., Floyd-Smith, T., Bates, R., & Plett, M. (2015). Belonging and academic engagement among undergraduate STEM students: a multi-institutional study. Research in Higher Education, 56(7), 750–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9367-x
Google Scholar CrossrefWolf-Wendel, L., Ward, K., & Kinzie, J. (2009). A tangled web of terms: the overlap and unique contribution of involvement, engagement, and integration to understanding college student success. Journal of College Student Development, 50(4), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0077
Google Scholar CrossrefZepke, N. (2014). Student engagement research in higher education: questioning an academic orthodoxy. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(6), 697–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.901956
Google Scholar CrossrefZepke, N., Butler, P., & Leach, L. (2012). Institutional research and improving the quality of student engagement. Quality in Higher Education, 18(3), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2012.730338
Google Scholar CrossrefPublished
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Razia Isaeva, Satu Uusiautti, Ilkka Ratinen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
