School Principal Support in Teacher Professional Development

Autores/as

  • Mehmet Fatih Karacabey Harran University

https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.2020.5158

Palabras clave:


Resumen

Turkish education system has enacted a vision of 2023 which emphasizes that school principals create and organize professional learning activities based on the needs of students and teachers. This research aimed to evaluate this vision by determining the level of support provided by school principals in teachers' professional development. It was based on a cross-sectional survey design of the quantitative method. The data collected from the 4,729 teachers working in Sanliurfa province in Turkey were analyzed. The results suggested that the school principals supported the professional development of the teachers occasionally and only 25.5% of principals supported teachers' professional development sufficiently. School principals mostly followed relevant resources to support teachers' professional development and inform teachers about innovations related to education. In addition, school principals did not adequately perform activities that may support teacher professional development such as determining individual and group development programs, organizing a professional development monitoring form for teachers, organizing educational activities outside the seminar period, receiving enough help from the experts in the area, and giving enough individual reading and research tasks. The results also indicated that the principals of high school teachers supported their professional development more than the principals working in primary and secondary schools, the principals of the classroom teachers and the principals of male teachers supported the professional development of the teachers more than the principals of the female and branch teachers and teachers’ level of education did not create any difference in the perceptions of the teachers.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Referencias

Akiba, M., & Liang, G. (2016). Effects of teacher professional learning activities on student achievement growth. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(1), 99-110.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bakioğlu, A. & İnandı, Y. (2001). Öğretmenin kariyer gelişiminde müdürün görevleri [Duties of the principal in the career development of the teacher]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi [Education Management in Theory and Practice], 28, 513-529.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bentler, P. M. & Bonnet, D. C. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bowe, J., & Gore, J. (2017). Reassembling teacher professional development: The case for Quality Teaching Rounds. Teachers and Teaching, 23(3), 352-366.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bozkuş, K. (2016). Okul müdürlerinin öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimini sağlama düzeyi [The level of school principals' professional development of teachers]. 8. Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Kongresi [8th International Educational Research Congress], Çanakkale, Türkiye.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bozkuş, K. (2019). The teacher professional development student assessment scale: A tool for principals. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership (REAL), 4(2), 375-405. doi: 10.30828/real/2019.2.6

Google Scholar Crossref

Bozkuş, K., & Bayrak, C. (2019). The application of the dynamic teacher professional development through experimental action research. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 11(4), 335-352. doi: 10.26822/iejee.2019450792

Google Scholar Crossref

Bozkuş, K., & Taştan, M. (2016). Teacher opinions about qualities of effective teaching. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 6(4), 469-490. doi: 10.14527/pegegog.2016.023.

Google Scholar Crossref

Buchanan, J. (2012). Improving the quality of teaching and learning: A teacher-as-learner centred approach. International Journal of Learning, 18(10), 345-356.

Google Scholar Crossref

Can, N. (2004). Öğretmenlerin geliştirilmesi ve etkili öğretmen davranışları [Development of teachers and effective teacher behavior]. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi [Journal of Social Sciences Institute of Erciyes University], 16(1), 103-119.

Google Scholar Crossref

Creemers, B., Kyriakides, L. & Antoniou, P. (2013). Teacher professional development for improving quality of teaching. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

Google Scholar Crossref

Çalık, C. & Şehitoğlu, E. T. (2006). Okul müdürlerinin insan kaynakları yönetimi işlevlerini yerine getirebilme yeterlikleri [Competencies of school principals to fulfill human resource management functions]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi [Journal of National Education], 170, 94-111.

Google Scholar Crossref

Day, C. (1999). Developing teachers: The challenges of lifelong learning. London: Falmer.

Google Scholar Crossref

Djatmiko, I. W. (2010). The teaching strategies in vocational education in the knowledge era. International Seminar on Vocational Education and Training at Yogyakarta State University.

Google Scholar Crossref

Duffield, S., Wageman, J., & Hodge, A. (2013). Examining how professional development impacted teachers and students of U.S. history courses. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 37(2), 85-96.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ekinci, A. (2010). Aday öğretmenlerin iş başında yetiştirilmesinde okul müdürlerinin rolü [The role of school principals in training prospective teachers at work]. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Journal of Dicle University Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education], 15, 63-77.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ekinci, E. (2015). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin mesleki gelişime ilişkin görüşleri (Mesleki gelişim modeli önerisi) [Classroom teachers' views on professional development (Professional development model proposal)]. (Unpublished master's thesis). Düzce University, Düzce, Turkey.

Google Scholar Crossref

Elçiçek, Z. (2016). Öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimine ilişkin bir model geliştirme çalışması [Study of developing a model for the professional development of teachers.]. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.

Google Scholar Crossref

Elmore, R. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.

Google Scholar Crossref

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.

Google Scholar Crossref

Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San-Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gedik, S., & Bellibas, M. S. (2015). Examining schools’ distributed instructional leadership capacity: Comparison of elementary and secondary schools. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(6), 101-110.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gözler, A., & Özmen, F. (2008). Öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişiminde okul yöneticilerinin güdüleme rolleri [Motivational roles of school administrators in the professional development of teachers]. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 3(1), 66-79.

Google Scholar Crossref

Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and teaching, 8(3), 381-391.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gündüz, Y. & Balyer, A. (2013). Gelecekte okul müdürlerinin gerçekleştirmeleri gereken roller [Roles that school principals should perform in the future]. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 13(3), 45-54.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gürbüz, R., Erdem, E. & Yıldırım, K. (2013). Başarılı okul müdürlerinin özellikleri [Characteristics of successful school principals]. Journal of Dicle University Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education, 20, 167-179.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gürer, G. T. (2017). Maarif müfettişlerinin ilkokul yöneticilerinin mesleki gelişimine katkısının belirlenmesi [Determining the contribution of education supervisors to the professional development of primary school administrators]. (Unpublished master's thesis). Balıkesir University, Balıkesir, Turkey.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hardy, I. (2012). The politics of teacher professional development: Policy, research and practice. New York: Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008): Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.

Google Scholar Crossref

Imhof, M. & Picard, C. (2009). Views on using portfolio in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 149-154.

Google Scholar Crossref

İlğan, A. (2013). Öğretmenler için etkili mesleki gelişim faaliyetleri [Effective professional development activities for teachers]. Uşak University Journal of Social Sciences, Special Issue, 41-56.

Google Scholar Crossref

Jöreskog, K. & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of educational research, 86(4), 945-980.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kenny, D. A. & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(3), 333-351.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kızılkaya, H. A. (2012). Öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimlerinin mesleki gelişime yönelik tutumları ve iş doyumları bakımından incelenmesi üzerine bir araştırma [A study on the examination of teachers' professional development in terms of their attitudes towards professional development and job satisfaction]. (Unpublished master's thesis). Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey.

Google Scholar Crossref

Korkmaz, İ. (2015). Öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimlerinde okul yöneticileri ve denetmenlerin etkililiğinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the effectiveness of school administrators and supervisors in the professional development of teachers]. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(4), 55-64.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kyriakides, L., Campbell, R. J., & Gagatsis, A. (2000). The significance of the classroom effect in primary schools: An application of Creemers’ comprehensive model of educational effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(4), 501-529.

Google Scholar Crossref

Liu, S., Hallinger, P., & Feng, D. (2016). Supporting the professional learning of teachers in China: Does principal leadership make a difference?. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 79-91.

Google Scholar Crossref

Lysaght, Z., O’Leary, M., & Ludlow, L. (2017). Measuring Teachers’ Assessment for Learning (AfL) Classroom Practices in Elementary Schools. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 3(2), 103-115. doi:10.12973/ijem.3.2.103

Google Scholar Crossref

MEB [Ministry of National Education]. (2016). PISA 2015 ulusal raporu. Ankara: MEB.

Google Scholar Crossref

Muijs, D. & Reynolds, D. (2000). School effectiveness and teacher effectiveness in mathematics: Some preliminary findings from the evaluation of the mathematics enhancement programme (primary). School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(3), 273-303.

Google Scholar Crossref

Odabaşı, H. F. (2011). Öğretmenlikte mesleki gelişimin kuramsal ve kavramsal yapısı: Öğretmenlikte mesleki gelişim [Theoretical and conceptual structure of professional development in teaching: Professional development in teaching]. Eskişehir, Turkey: Anadolu University Publication, No: 1809.

Google Scholar Crossref

OECD. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: first results from TALIS. Paris: OECD.

Google Scholar Crossref

OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results in focus: what 15-year-olds know and 2 what they can do with what they know. Paris: OECD.

Google Scholar Crossref

Özdemir, S. M. (2016). Öğretmen niteliğinin bir göstergesi olarak sürekli mesleki gelişim [Continuous professional development as an indicator of teacher quality.]. Gazi Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(3), 233‐244.

Google Scholar Crossref

Özer, B. (2008). Öğretmenlik meslek bilgisi alanındaki gelişmeler [Developments in teaching professional knowledge.]. In A, Hakan (Ed.), Öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimi [Professional development of teachers] (pp. 195-216). Eskişehir, Turkey: Anadolu University Faculty of Open Education Publications.

Google Scholar Crossref

Postholm, M. B. (2012). Teachers’ professional development: A theoretical review. Educational Research, 54(4), 405-429.

Google Scholar Crossref

Richard, V., & Bélanger, M. (2018). Accepting Research: Teachers' Representations of Participation in Educational Research Projects. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 4(2), 61-73. doi:10.12973/ijem.4.2.61

Google Scholar Crossref

Rushton, S., Morgan, J., & Richard, M. (2007). Teacher’s Myers-Briggs personality profiles: Identifying effective teacher personality traits. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 432-441.

Google Scholar Crossref

Sabuncuoğlu, O. (2006). A Study of the effects of model of teacher education and professional development on practising and prospective teachers of English in ELT at universities. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey.

Google Scholar Crossref

Scheerens, J. (2010). Teachers’ professional development: Europe in international comparison. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Union.

Google Scholar Crossref

Smith, C. & Gillespie, M. (2007). Research on professional development and teacher change: Implications for adult basic education. Review of adult learning and literacy, 7(7), 205-244.

Google Scholar Crossref

Smith, K. & Tillema, H. (2001). Long-term influences of portfolios on Professional development. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(2), 183-203.

Google Scholar Crossref

Stein, M. K., & Nelson, B. S. (2003). Leadership content knowledge. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 25(4), 423-448.

Google Scholar Crossref

Stentoft, D. (2017). From saying to doing interdisciplinary learning: Is problem-based learning the answer? Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(1), 51-61.

Google Scholar Crossref

Swart, F., Knèzic, D., Onstenk, J., & Graaff, R.d. (2019). Evaluating and Improving Teacher Educators’ Language-Oriented Performance in Content-Based Teaching. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(1), 71-86. doi:10.12973/ijem.5.1.71

Google Scholar Crossref

Usdan, M. (2000). Leadership for student learning: Reinventing the principalship. Institute for Educational Leadership, National Pres Club, 12, 1-24.

Google Scholar Crossref

Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teaching and teacher education, 61, 47-59.

Google Scholar Crossref

World Bank. (2011). Improving the quality and equity of basic education in Turkey challenges and options. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Google Scholar Crossref

Publicado

2021-01-16

Almetric

Dimensions

Cómo citar

Karacabey, M. F. (2021). School Principal Support in Teacher Professional Development. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 9(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.2020.5158

Número

Sección

Artí­culos