INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: THE ROLE OF HEADS OF SCHOOLS IN MANAGING THE INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMME

Autores/as

https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.2016.1691

Palabras clave:


Descargas

Resumen

Scholars and practitioners agree that instructional leadership (IL) can be one of the most useful tools for creating an effective teaching and learning environment. This paper investigates the instructional leadership practices engaged in by heads of secondary schools to enhance classroom instruction and students learning, particularly the way they manage the school instructional programme. Two objectives guided the study: to explore the informants’ understanding on the concept of instructional leadership; and to examine the role played by heads of schools (HoSs) in managing the instructional programme to enhance teachers’ classroom instruction and students’ learning. It draws on the qualitative data generated from interviews, focus group discussions, and observations. The informants for this study were HoSs, senior academic masters/mistresses, teachers and students. The study findings confirm that HoSs, SAMs, teachers and students were not familiar with the concept of instructional leadership. On the other hand the instructional programme was not effectively managed as heads of departments were not involved in curriculum coordination, syllabi were not covered on time, and HoSs did not undertake classroom observations or engage in review of curriculum materials. The paper, however, concludes that without an effective management of the instructional programme in favour of promoting teachers’ classroom instruction and students’ learning, efforts to that effect are doomed to fail.


Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Aaron Mkanga Manaseh, Mkwawa University College of Education

Department: Educational Foundations and management

Rank: Assistant Lecturer

Referencias

Day, C., Harris, A., Hadfield, M., Tolley, H., & Beresford, J., (2000). Leading schools in times of change. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Dimmock, C., & Wildy, H. (1995). Conceptualizing curriculum management in an effective secondary school: A Western Australian case study. The Curriculum Journal, (22)6, 297- 323.

Google Scholar Crossref

Elmore, R. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington DC: The Albert Shanker Institute.

Google Scholar Crossref

Galabawa, J. C. J., & Nikundiwe, A. M. (2000). “Why Ugandan secondary schools do well” in Galabawa, J. C. J. et al., Quality of education in Tanzania: Issues and experiences. Dar es Salaam: University of Dar es Salaam.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gillet, J. (2010). The making of the preferred principal. South African Educational Leader, (7)2, 1-11.

Google Scholar Crossref

Heck, R. H. (1992). Principals’ instructional leadership and school performance: Implications for policy development. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, (14)1, 21-34.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hakielimu, (2011). The relationship between curriculum and education quality. Dar es Salaam: Hakielimu.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hallinger, P. (2005). “Instructional leadership: How has the model evolved and what have we learned?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 2005. Montreal, Canada.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hallinger, P. (2008). “Methodologies for studying school leadership: A review of 25 years of research using the principal instructional management rating scale.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, June 2008. New York.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hallinger, P., & Walker, A. (2014). Exploring whole school vs. subject department improvement in Hong Kong secondary schools. School improvement and school effectiveness. Retrieved from http://www.philliphallinger.com. on 1st April 2015.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hoadly, U., Christie, P., Jacklin, H., & Ward, C. (2007). Managing to learn- instructional leadership in South African secondary schools. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hoy, W., & Miskel, C. (2008). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice. New York: McGraw Hill.

Google Scholar Crossref

Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y.S. Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 428- 444). London: Sage Publications.

Google Scholar Crossref

Jita, L. C. (2010). Instructional leadership for the improvement of science and mathematics in South Africa. Procodia–Social and Behavioral Sciences,(9)2, 851–854.

Google Scholar Crossref

King, D. (2002). The changing shape of leadership. Educational Leadership, (59)8,

Google Scholar Crossref

–63.

Google Scholar Crossref

Lwaitama, A. L., & Galabawa, J. C. J. (2008). “Community secondary schools: How long is their journey to quality education.” Paper presented as a contribution to the on-going national education debate, 21st October 2008. Dar es Salaam: Tanzania Education Network (TEN).

Google Scholar Crossref

McEwan, E. K. (2009). Ten traits of highly effective schools: Raising the achievement bar for all students. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ministry of Education and Vocational Training (MoEVT), (2011). Secondary education development programme II, final draft July 2010–June 2015. Dar es Salaam: MoEVT.

Google Scholar Crossref

Mwasoo, D. (2011). Does syllabi coverage enable students to pass exams? Nairobi: Nairobi University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ngirwa, C. C. (2006). The effects of leadership styles in promoting academic performance in primary education. M.A. (Ed) Dissertation, Dar es Salaam: University of Dar es Salaam.

Google Scholar Crossref

Nguni, S. (2005). Transformational leadership in Tanzania education: A study of the effects of transformational leadership on teachers’ job satisfaction, commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in Tanzania primary and secondary schools. Doctoral thesis, Rod bound University.

Google Scholar Crossref

Plewis, I. (2011). Curriculum coverage and classroom grouping as explanation of teacher differences in students’ mathematics progress. Educational Research and Evaluation, (4)2, 97- 107.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pustejovsky, J., Spillane, J.P., Heaton, R.M., & Lewis, W. J. (2009). Understanding teacher leadership in middle school mathematics: A collaborative research effort. Journal of Mathematics and Science: Collaborative Explorations, (11)2, 19–40.

Google Scholar Crossref

Spillane, J., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. (2000). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Evanston: Institute for Policy Research.

Google Scholar Crossref

Spillane, J. P., Camburn, E. M., & Parej, A. S. (2007). Taking a distributed perspective to the school principal’s workday. Leadership and Policy in Schools, (6)1,

Google Scholar Crossref

–125.

Google Scholar Crossref

Spillane, J. P., & Zuberi, A. (2009). Designing and piloting a leadership daily practicelog: Using logs to study the practice of leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, (45)3, 375–423.

Google Scholar Crossref

Sumra, S. & Rajani, R. (2006). Secondary education in Tanzania: Key policy challenges. Dar es Salaam: Hakielimu.

Google Scholar Crossref

World Bank, (2010). Recruiting, retaining, and retraining secondary school teachers and principals in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington DC: The World Bank.

Google Scholar Crossref

Descargas

Publicado

2016-01-15

Almetric

Dimensions

Cómo citar

Manaseh, A. M. (2016). INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: THE ROLE OF HEADS OF SCHOOLS IN MANAGING THE INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMME. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 4(1), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.2016.1691

Número

Sección

Artí­culos