Public Opinion, Democracy, and the Armed Forces: Chile before the 1973 Military Coup
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
The 1973 military coup in Chile was one of the most violent in Latin America. In an environment of high political polarization and poor economic indicators, the Chilean Armed Forces overthrew President Salvador Allende. There is extensive literature discussing the political and institutional causes of the military coup without much reference to the characteristics of public opinion. Based on surveys conducted in 1972 and 1973, we evaluated support for a military government and the Armed Forces’ image in a context of high political upheaval. We found that months before the military coup, about 25% supported a military government and the Armed Forces also had broad popular support, being perceived as reliable and politically neutral actors. Although there is some consensus on the insurrectionary character of the Armed Forces before the military coup, we conclude that this image was far from being reflected in public opinion.
Downloads
References
Adelman, J., & Fajardo, M. (2016). Between Capitalism and Democracy: A Study in the Political Economy of Ideas in Latin America, 1968–1980. Latin American Research Review, 51(3), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2016.0031
Google Scholar CrossrefAgüero, F. (2003). 30 años después: la ciencia política y las relaciones Fuerzas Armadas, Estado y Sociedad. Revista de Ciencia Política, 23(2), 251-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2003000200013
Google Scholar CrossrefAgüero, F., Bustamante, F., & Varas, A. (1980). Chile, democracia, Fuerzas Armadas. FLACSO.
Google Scholar CrossrefAlmond, G., & Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture. Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefArriagada, G. (1986). El pensamiento político de los militares. Editorial Aconcagua.
Google Scholar CrossrefBarros, R. (2002). Constitutionalism and Dictatorship: Pinochet, the Junta, and the 1980 Constitution. Cambridge University Press
Google Scholar CrossrefBeck, P. & Jennings, M.K. (1991). Familiy Traditions, Political Periods, and the Development of Partisan Orientations. The Journal of Politics, 53(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/2131578
Google Scholar CrossrefBerman, S. (1998). The Social Democratic Movement: Ideas and Politics in the Making of Interwar Europe. Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefBoeninger, E. (1998). Democracia en Chile: Lecciones para la Gobernabilidad. Editorial Andrés Bello.
Google Scholar CrossrefBooth, J., & Seligson M. (2009). Legitimacy and Political Participation in Eight Latin American Nations. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefCampbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stokes, D. (1960). The American Voter. University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefCañas, E. (1997). Proceso político en Chile: 1973-1990. Editorial Andrés Bello
Google Scholar CrossrefCarlin, R. (2017). Sorting Out Support for Democracy: AQ-Method Study. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12409
Google Scholar CrossrefCarmines, E., & Stimson, J. (1989). Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefCollier, R., & Collier, D. (1991). Shaping the Political Arena. Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regimen Dynamics in Latin America. Princenton University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefCollier, S., & Sater, W. (1998). Historia de Chile 1808-1994. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefConverse, P. (1969). Of Time and Partisan Stability. Comparative Political Studies, 2, 139-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041406900200201
Google Scholar CrossrefCordero, R. (2009). Dígalo con números: La industria de la opinión pública en Chile. In R. Rodrigo (Ed.), La sociedad de la opinión: Reflexiones sobre encuestas y cambio político en democracia. Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales.
Google Scholar CrossrefCruz-Coke, R. (1984). Historia Electoral de Chile: 1925-1973. Jurídica de Chile.
Google Scholar CrossrefDahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy: participation and opposition. Yale University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefDrake, P. (1978). Socialism and populism in Chile: 1932-1952. University of Illinois Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefEaston, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. Wiley.
Google Scholar CrossrefFaúndez, J. (1992). Izquierdas y democracia en Chile. 1932-1973. BAT.
Google Scholar CrossrefGalleguillos, N. (2004). Re-establishing civilian supremacy over police institutions: an analysis of attempted reforms of the security in Chile. Journal of Third World Studies, 21(1), 57-77. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45198362
Google Scholar CrossrefGil, F. (1969). El sistema político de Chile. Editorial Andrés Bello.
Google Scholar CrossrefGirard, A. (1958). The First Opinion Research in Uruguay and Chile. Public Opinion Quarterly 22(3), 251-260.
Google Scholar Crossrefhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2746333
Google Scholar CrossrefHadenius, A., & Teorell, J. (2005). Cultural and Economic Prerequisites of Democracy: Reassessing Recent Evidence. Studies in Comparative International Development 39(4), 87-106.
Google Scholar Crossrefhttps://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686166
Google Scholar CrossrefHamuy, E., Salcedo, D., & Sepúlveda, O. (1958). El primer satélite artificial: Sus efectos en la opinión pública. Instituto de Sociología & Editorial Universitaria.
Google Scholar CrossrefHarmer, T., & Riquelme,A. (2014). Chile y la Guerra Fría global. RIL Editores.
Google Scholar CrossrefHigley, J., & Pakulski, J. (2000). Elite Power Games and Democratic Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. In M. Dobry (Ed.), Democratic and Capitalist Transitions in Eastern Europe: Lessons for the Social Sciences. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Google Scholar Crossrefhttps://doi.org/10.1163/187633299X00057
Google Scholar CrossrefHuneeus, C. (2000). El Régimen de Pinochet. Editorial Sudamericana Chilena.
Google Scholar CrossrefHuneeus, C. (2003). Chile, un país dividido: la actualidad del pasado. Catalonia.
Google Scholar CrossrefInglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefInglehart, R. (1988). The renaissance of political culture. American Political Science Review, 82(4), 1203-1230. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961756
Google Scholar CrossrefInglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization. Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefInglehart, R. (2004). Human beliefs and values: A cross-cultural sourcebook based on the 1999-2002 values surveys. Siglo XXI.
Google Scholar CrossrefJennings, K., & Niemi, R. (1968). The transmission of political values from parent to Child. American Political Science Review, 62(1), 169-184.
Google Scholar CrossrefKingdon, J. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Harper-Collins.
Google Scholar CrossrefLinz, J. (1990). Democracia: Presidencialismo o parlamentarismo. ¿Hace alguna diferencia?. In O. Godoy (Ed.), Hacia una Democracia moderna: La opción parlamentaria. Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.
Google Scholar CrossrefLinz, J. (1994). Democracy, Presidential or Parliamentary: Does It Make a Difference? In J. Linz & A. Valenzuela, A. (Ed.), The Failure of Presidential Democracy: The Case of Latin America. John Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefLipset, S. (1959). Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. The American Political Science Review 53(1), 69-105. https://doi.org/10.2307/1951731
Google Scholar CrossrefMainwaring, S., & Pérez-Liñán, A. (2013). Democracies and Dictatorships in Latin America. Emergence, survival, and fall. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefMainwaring, S. (1993). Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination. Comparative Political Studies, 26(4), 198-228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414093026002003
Google Scholar CrossrefMiller, W., & Shanks, M. (1996). The New American Voter. Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefMonsálvez, D. (2007). Entre el discurso y la acción: una mirada a las complejas y no menos tensionantes relaciones entre la unidad popular y las fuerzas armadas. Tiempo y Espacio, 15(18), 19-55.
Google Scholar Crossrefhttps://revistas.ubiobio.cl/index.php/TYE/article/view/1722
Google Scholar CrossrefMontes, E, Mainwaring, S., & Ortega, E. (2000). Rethinking the Chilean Party Systems. Journal of Latin American Studies, 32, 795-824. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X00005873
Google Scholar CrossrefNavia, P., & Osorio, R. (2015). Las encuestas de opinión pública en Chile antes de 1973. Latin American Research Review, 50(1), 117-139. https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2015.0009
Google Scholar CrossrefNavia, P. (2005). La transformación de votos en escaños: leyes electorales en Chile, 1833-2004. Política y Gobierno, 12(2), 233-276. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1665-20372005000200233&lng=es&tlng=es
Google Scholar CrossrefO”Donnell, G., & Schmitter, G. (1988). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. The Johns Hopkins University Press
Google Scholar CrossrefO”Donnell, G. (1973). Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. University of California Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefPassmore, L. (2016). The Apolitics of Memory: Remembering Military Service under Pinochet throught and alongside Transitional Justice, Truth and Reconcilation. Memory Studies 9(2), 173-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698015587152
Google Scholar CrossrefPassmore, L. (2017). The Wars inside Chile’s Barracks: Remembering Military Service under Pinochet. The University of Wisconsin Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefPion-Berlin, D. (2001). Civil-Military Relations in Latin America: New Analytical Perspectives. The University of North Carolina Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefPopkin, S. (1991). The reasoning voter: communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefPower, M. (2008). La mujer de derecha. El poder femenino y la lucha contra Salvador Allende 1964-1973. Centro de Investigaciones Diego Barros Arana.
Google Scholar CrossrefProthro, J.W., & Chaparro, P. (1974). Public Opinion and the Movement of Chilean Government to the Left, 1952–72. Journal of Politics 36(1), 2-43. https://doi.org/10.2307/2129109
Google Scholar CrossrefPrzeworski, A., Alvarez M., & Cheibub, J. (2000). Democracy and Development. Political Institutions and Well- Being in the World, 1950-1990. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefRehren, A. (1998). La Organización de la Presidencia y el Proceso Político Chileno. Revista de Ciencia Política, 19, 89-124. http://ojs.uc.cl/index.php/rcp/article/view/7046
Google Scholar CrossrefRichardson, L. (1991). Postmodern Social Theory: Representational Practices. Sociological Theory, 9, 173-179. https://doi.org/10.2307/202078
Google Scholar CrossrefRueschemeyer, D., Huber, E., & Stephens, J. (1992). Capitalist development and democracy. University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefSartori, G. (1992). Partidos y sistemas de partidos. Alianza.
Google Scholar CrossrefScully, T. (1992). Rethinking the Center: Party Politics in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Chile. Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefShugart, M., & Carey, J. (1992). Presidents and Assemblies. Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefSiavelis, P. (1997). Continuity and change in the Chilean party system - On the transformational effects of electoral reform. Comparative Political Studies 30(6), 651-674.
Google Scholar Crossrefhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0010414097030006001
Google Scholar CrossrefSinclair, J. (1998). Latin American Television: a global view. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefStepan, A., & Skach, C. (1993). Constitutional frameworks and democratic consolidation: Parliamentarianism versus presidentialism. World Politics 46(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950664
Google Scholar CrossrefStepan, A. (1973). Authoritarian Brazil: Origins, Policies, and Future. Yale University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefTorcal, M., & Mainwaring, S. (2003). The Political Recrafting of Social Bases of Party Competition: Chile, 1973-95. British Journal of Political Science, 33, 55-84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123403000036
Google Scholar CrossrefValenzuela, A. (1978). The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Chile. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefValenzuela, A. (2003). El quiebre de la democracia en Chile. Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales.
Google Scholar CrossrefValenzuela, S. (1995). Orígenes y transformaciones del sistema de partidos en Chile. Estudios Públicos, 58, 5-84.
Google Scholar CrossrefValenzuela, S. (1999). Respuesta a Eugenio Tironi y Felipe Agüero: reflexiones sobre el presente y futuro del paisaje político chileno a la luz de su pasado. Estudios Públicos, 75, 273-290.
Google Scholar CrossrefVaras, A. (2017). Los militares y la política en Chile, 1810-2015. In I. Jacksic & J. Ossa (Eds.), Historia Política de Chile, 1810-2010. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Google Scholar CrossrefVaras, A., & Agüero, F. (1988). La autonomía militar en América Latina. Nueva Sociedad.
Google Scholar CrossrefVaras, A. (1982). Fuerzas armadas y gobierno militar: corporativización y politización castrense. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 44(2), 397-411. https://doi.org/10.2307/3540272
Google Scholar CrossrefVaras, A. (1987). Los militares en el poder. Pehuén/FLACSO
Google Scholar CrossrefVentura, R. (2001). Family political socialization in multiparty systems. Comparative Political Studies 34(6), 666-691. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414001034006004
Google Scholar CrossrefWalker, I. (1999). El futuro de la DC. Ediciones B.
Google Scholar CrossrefZaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mario Herrera, Mauricio Morales
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
.
