(Il)legal Subjects? Contested Identities of Canadian Indoor Sex Workers

Authors

  • Menaka Raguparan Carleton University

https://doi.org/10.4471/generos.2014.32

Downloads

Abstract

Women’s participation in the sex trade industry has always been a subject of contention, with conflicting representations. In this paper, I present the finding of in-depth, face-to-face interviews with ten independent in-call and/or out-call sex workers in Canada. Through these interviews, I seek to understand the distinctive names and meanings attributed to the identities of sex workers. Driving on divergent analytical concepts such as legal consciousness, respectability, self-creation and the intersection between gender, race, class and sexuality I chart participants’ perceptions and interpretations of the classifications inscribed to them by legal, political, and the civil society. Moving beyond existing languages and discourses that are particularly used to define, name and characterize women’s involvement in the sex industry, in this paper I highlight the fluidity and complexities of personal, social and political identities of the ten sex workers.

 

Key Words: Sex Work, Women, Law, Gender inequality, Resistance

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Menaka Raguparan, Carleton University

PhD Candidate

Department of Law and Legal Studies

References

Bakan, Joel & Robin Elliot (2003). Eds. Canadian constitutional law / the Constitutional

Google Scholar Crossref

Law Group. 3ed Edition. Emond Montgomery: Toronto.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bell, David & Jon Bonnie (2000). The Sexual Citizen: Queer Politics and Beyond. Polity:

Google Scholar Crossref

Cambridge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bruckert, Chris & Colette Parent (2006). “The In-Call Sex Industry: Classed and

Google Scholar Crossref

Gendered Labour on the Margins.” In Criminalizing Women: Gender and (In)Justice in Neo-liberal Times. Ed Gillian Balfourd & Elizabeth Comack. Pp95-112. Fernwood: Black Point, N.S.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bruckert, Chris, Colette Parent & Pascale Robitaille (2003). “Erotic Service/Erotic Dance

Google Scholar Crossref

Establishments: Two Types of Marginalized Labour.” Department of Criminology, University of Ottawa.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ewick, P., & Susan S. Silbey (1998). The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday

Google Scholar Crossref

Life. University of Chicago press: Chicago and London.

Google Scholar Crossref

Foucault, M. (1980). History of sexuality. Pantheon Books: New York

Google Scholar Crossref

Jiwani, Y. (2002).“The Criminalization of "Race" and the Racialization of Crime.” In

Google Scholar Crossref

Crimes of Colour: Racialization and the Criminal Justice System in Canada. Eds. W. Chan & K. Mirchandani. pp. 67-86. Peterborough: Broadview Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Lewis et al., (2005). “Managing Risk and Safety on the Job: The Experience of Canadian

Google Scholar Crossref

Sex Workers.” In Contemporary Research on Sex Work. Pp147-167. The Haworth Press, Inc.

Google Scholar Crossref

Razack, Sherene H. (1998) “Introduction: Looking White People in the Eye.” In Looking

Google Scholar Crossref

White People in the Eye: Gender, Race, and Culture in Courtrooms and Classrooms. Pp 3-22. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Smart, Carol (1989). Feminism and the power of law. Routledge: London ; New York.

Google Scholar Crossref

Stychin, Carl.F(1995). Law’s Desire: Sexuality and the Limits of Justice. London:

Google Scholar Crossref

Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Silbey, S. S (2005). “After Legal Consciousness.” Annual Reviews, Law Social Sciences.

Google Scholar Crossref

:323–68.

Google Scholar Crossref

Downloads

Published

2014-02-24

Almetric

Dimensions

How to Cite

Raguparan, M. (2014). (Il)legal Subjects? Contested Identities of Canadian Indoor Sex Workers. Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies, 3(1), 328–350. https://doi.org/10.4471/generos.2014.32

Issue

Section

Articles