New Forms of Exploitation: The Synthesis of Mis-recognition and Mal-distribution
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
Diversity and inclusion have become major topics in current political and economic thinking. While some practical progress has been made in combating the stigmatization and marginalization of historically discriminated groups, mal-distribution of economic resources persists. In order to devise a conceptual framework which incorporates dimensions of diversity (with respect to social categories) and equality (in terms of economically justifiable distribution of income and wealth), the paper will review the current debate on diversity and its role with respect to exploitation. It will be examined how the economic logic of Western capitalist systems is re-established in diversity studies, and suggestions for from a feminist point of view politically more astute economic approaches are proposed.
Downloads
References
Akerlof, G. and Kranton R (2000). “Economics and Identity.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, 3: 715-753.
Google Scholar CrossrefAnthias, Floya (2013) Hierarchies of social location, class and intersectionality: Towards a translocational frame. International Sociology, 28(1) 121–138.
Google Scholar CrossrefAzoulay, Katja Gibel. (1997). Experience, empathy and strategic essentialism. Cultural Studies, 11(1), 89-110.
Google Scholar CrossrefBaldwin, Marjorie L. & Johnson, William G. (2006). A critical review of studies of discrimination against workers with disabilities. In William M. Rodgers III (Hrsg.), Handbook on the Economics of Discrimination (S. 119-160). Cheltenham, UK: Edward-Elgar Publishing.
Google Scholar CrossrefBanting, K. and Kymlicka, W. (2006). “Multiculturalism and the welfare state: Setting the context (Introduction).” In Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Recognition and Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies, edited by Keith Banting and Will Kymlicka, pp. 1-45. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Google Scholar CrossrefBourdieu, P. (1985) “The social space and the genesis of groups.” Social Science Information 24, 2: 195-220.
Google Scholar CrossrefBourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefBowles, S. and Gintis, H. (1977). “The Marxian theory of value and heterogeneous labour: a critique and a reformulation.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 1: 173-192.
Google Scholar CrossrefBowles, S., Lury, G. and Sethi, R. (2009). “Group Inequality.” Economic Working Paper of the Institute of Advanced Studies, Princeton. http://www.sss.ias.edu/publications/economicsworking. Accessed June 6, 2011.
Google Scholar CrossrefCharles, K. and Guryan J. (2011). “Studying discrimination: fundamental challenges and recent progress.” Working Paper 17156, National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA.
Google Scholar CrossrefCrenshaw, K (1989): “Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics.” HeinOnline, University of Chicago Legal Forum (1989): 139-168.
Google Scholar CrossrefDavis, J. (2007). “Akerlof and Kranton on identity in economics: inverting the analysis.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 31: 349-362.
Google Scholar CrossrefEide, Elisabeth. (2010). Strategic essentialism and ethnification. Nordicom Review, 31(2), 63-78.
Google Scholar CrossrefEisenstein, Hester. (2005). A Dangerous Liaison? Feminism and Corporate Globalization. Science & Society, 69(3), 487-518.
Google Scholar CrossrefElson, Diane & Warnecke Tonia. (2012). IMF Policies and Gender Orders. In Brigitte Young, Isabella Bakker & Diane Elson (Hrsg.), Questioning financial governance from a feminist perspective (S. 110-131). London/New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefEngland, P. (2002). “The Separative Self: Androcentric Bias in Neoclassical Assumptions.” In Readings in Economic Sociology, edited by Nicole Woolsey Biggart, pp. 154–167. Malden, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
Google Scholar CrossrefErel, Umut. (2004). Paradigmen Kultureller Differenz und Hybriditaet. In Martin Sökefeld (Hrsg.), Jenseits des Paradigmas kultureller Differenz: Neue Perspektiven auf Einwanderer aus der Türkei. Kultur und soziale praxis (S. 35-51). Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Verlag.
Google Scholar CrossrefFerber, M. and Nelson, J. (2003). Feminist Economics Today: Beyond Economic Man. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefFine, B. (2009). “The economics of identity and the identity of economics?” Cambridge Journal of Economics 33, 2: 175-191.
Google Scholar CrossrefFolbre, N. (1991). “The Unproductive Housewife: Her Evolution in Nineteenth-Century Economic Thought.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 16, 3: 463-484.
Google Scholar CrossrefFraser, N. (1995). “From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a ‘Post-Socialist’ Age.” New Left Review 212: 68-93.
Google Scholar CrossrefFraser, N. (2000). “Rethinking Recognition.” New Left Review 3, May/June: 107-120.
Google Scholar CrossrefFraser, N. and Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition?: a political-philosophical exchange. London, New York: Verso.
Google Scholar CrossrefFraser, N. and Nicholson, L. (1989). “Social Criticism without Philosophy: An Encounter between Feminism and Postmodernism.” Social Text (21), Universal Abandon? The Politics of Postmodernism: 83-104.
Google Scholar CrossrefGiddens, A. (1987). “Structuralism, post-structuralism and the production of culture.” In Social theory and modern sociology, edited by Anthony Giddens, pp. 73-108. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefHajdukowski-Ahmed, M. (2008) A dialogical approach to identity: implications for refugee women. In Hajdkowski-Ahmed, M., Khanlou, N. and Moussa, H. (eds) Not born a refugee woman: contesting identities, rethinking practices, 28–54. New York: Berghahn.
Google Scholar CrossrefHanappi, H. (2013) Can Europe survive? Papers in Evolutionary Political Economics, 9 (2012), www.econ.tuwien.ac.at/hanappi/publications.html. Accessed September 9th, 2013.
Google Scholar CrossrefHanappi, H. and Hanappi-Egger, E. (2003). Elements of an I-O-based Framework for Marxian, Feminist and World-System Approaches. In: Kohler, G., Chaves E. J. (eds.): Globalization: Critical Perspectives, pp. 315-334. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Google Scholar CrossrefHanappi, G. and Hanappi-Egger, E. (2012). “Middle Class or in the Middle of a Class?” AHE-Conference "Political Economy and the Outlook for Capitalism, Paris, France, 5.-7. July, 2012.
Google Scholar CrossrefHanappi, G. and Hanappi-Egger, E. (2013) Gramsci meets Veblen: On the search for a new revolutionary class. Journal of Economic Issues (JEI) XLVII (2): 375-381.
Google Scholar CrossrefHanappi-Egger, E. (2006). Gender and diversity from a management perspective: Synonyms or complements? Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change, 3(2), 121-134.
Google Scholar CrossrefHanappi-Egger, E. (2011). The Triple M of Organizations: Man, Management and Myth. Vienna, New York: Springer.
Google Scholar CrossrefHanappi-Egger, E. and Hanappi, H. (2011). Exploitation re-visited: New forms, same ideologies? Manuscript, AHEconference, Nottingham, Great Britain, 06.07.-09.07.2011.
Google Scholar CrossrefHanappi-Egger, E. and Ortlieb, R. (2014) Age, ethnicity and class in organizations. The Oxford Handbook of Diversity Studies in Organization and Management, forthcoming.
Google Scholar CrossrefHanappi-Egger, E. and Ukur, G. (2011). “Challenging Diversity Management: on the meaning of cultural context: the Case of Kenya.” Proceeding of the 7th Critical Management Studies Conference, Naples, Italy, 11.-13. July, 2011.
Google Scholar CrossrefHanappi-Egger, Edeltraud; Hermann, Anett, and Hofmann, Roswitha. (2010). Mikrokredite für Frauen: Instrument zur Akkumulation von symbolischem Kapital?! Empowermentmaßnahmen als Basis für genderspezifischen sozialen Wandel am Beispiel des Mikrokreditsektors in Mittelägypten. Gender - Zeitschrift für Geschlecht, Kultur und Gesellschaft (3): 77-91.
Google Scholar CrossrefKelly, E. and Dobbin, F. (1998). “How Affirmative Action Became Diversity Management.” American Behavioral Scientist 4, 7: 960-984.
Google Scholar CrossrefKersten, A. (2000). “Diversity management. Dialogue, dialectics and diversion.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 13, 3: 235-248.
Google Scholar CrossrefMagala, Slawomir J. (2009). Diversity, Darwin and democracy. European Journal of Cross-Cultural Competence and Management, 1(1), 28-33.
Google Scholar CrossrefMalik, Sarita. (2001). Representing Black Britain: Black and Asian images on television. London: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefMcCall, L. (2005). “The Complexity of Intersectionality.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30, 3: 1771-1800.
Google Scholar CrossrefNelson, J. (1995). “Feminism and Economics.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 9, 2: 131–148.
Google Scholar CrossrefNelson, Julie A. (2006). Can We Talk? Feminist Economists in Dialogue with Social Theorists. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture & Society, 31(4), 1051-1074.
Google Scholar CrossrefNoon, Mike. (2007). The Fatal Flaws of Diversity and the Business Case for Ethnic Minorities. Work, Employment and Society, 21(4), 773–784.
Google Scholar CrossrefOwen, J. (2011) Chavs. The demonization of the working class. London, New York: Verso.
Google Scholar CrossrefPrasad, P., Mills, A., Elmes, M. and Prasad, A. (1997). Managing the Organizational Melting Pot: Dilemmas of Workplace Diversity. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar CrossrefRazack, S. (1998) Looking white people in the eye: gender, race and culture in courtrooms and classrooms, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefRosenau, .M. (1992). Post-modernism and social sciences: Insights, inroads, and intrusions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefSasson-Levy, O. (2013) A Different Kind of Whiteness: Marking and Unmarking of Social Boundaries in the Construction of Hegemonic Ethnicity. Sociological Forum, 28, 1, 27-50.
Google Scholar CrossrefSedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. (1997). Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading; or, you’re so paranoid, you probably think this Introduction is about you. In Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick (Hrsg.), Novel Gazing: queer readings in fictions (S. 1-37). London, Durham: Duke University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefShereen, Benjamin. (2002). 'Valuing diversity': a cliche´ for the 21st century?. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 6(4), 309-323.
Google Scholar CrossrefSherif, Musafer & Sherif, Carolyn Wood. (1969). Social psychology. New York: Harper & Row.
Google Scholar CrossrefSkeggs B (1997) Formations of Class and Gender. Cambridge: Polity.
Google Scholar CrossrefSpivak, Gayatri. (1995). Subaltern Studies: Deconstructing Historiography. In Donna Landry & Gerald MacLean (Hrsg.), The Spivak Reader (S. 203-235). New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefTajfel, H. and Turner, J. (1986) “The social identity theory of inter-group behavior.” In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by Stephen Worchel and William Austin, pp. 7-24. Chigago: Nelson-Hall.
Google Scholar CrossrefTaylor, Y., Hines, S. and Casey, M. E. (eds.) (2011) Theorizing Intersectionality and Sexuality (Genders and Sexualities in the Social Sciences), London: Palgrave
Google Scholar CrossrefWeisskopf, T., Bowles, S. and Gordon. D. (1983). “Hearts and Minds: A Social Model of US Productivity Growth.” Brooking Papers on Economic Activity 2: 381-441.
Google Scholar CrossrefWetterer, Angelika. (2002). Strategien rhetorischer Modernisierung. Zeitschrift für Frauenforschung und Geschlechterstudien, 20(3), 129-148.
Google Scholar CrossrefWilson, Elisabeth. (2000). Inclusion, exclusion and ambiguity – The role of organisational culture. Personnel Review, 29(3), 274 – 303.
Google Scholar CrossrefWinker G and Degele N (2011) Intersectionality as multi-level analysis: Dealing with social inequality. European Journal of Women’s Studies 18(1): 51–66.
Google Scholar CrossrefWrench, John. (2005). Diversity management can be bad for you. Race Class, 46(3), 73-84.
Google Scholar CrossrefZanoni Patrizia; Janssens, Maddy; Benschop, Yvonne & Nkomo, Stella. (2010). Unpacking Diversity, Grasping Inequality: Rethinking Difference Through Critical Perspectives. Organization, 17(1), 9-29.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Metrics
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
