Gender, Language, and Society: Saudi Female University Students’ Perception of the Category of Professions

Ghsoon Reda, Amani Hamdan



This study concerns itself with the prevalence of gender stereotypes and classification of professions in Saudi Arabia. A survey and follow-up interview were administered to 80 female university students to determine whether young Saudi females’ classification of professions carries evaluative connotations related to gender. The results show that the subjects associate higher status (or skilled) professions with males and lower status professions with females despite the following facts: (i) Saudi women work in almost all professions, due to the rule of gender segregation and (ii) the image of women as professionals forms part of the participants' knowledge about Islam in which women are not stereotyped. The research highlights how the social experience of gender stereotyping plays a more important role than any other kind of experience in the hierarchical organization of the category of professions.


gender and language; gender and identity; women’s education in Saudi Arabia, gender stereotypes and classification; Saudi women

Full Text:



Ahmed, L. (1992). Women and gender in Islam: Historical roots of modern debate. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Ali, A. (1993). Al-Qur’an: A contemporary translation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Al-Manea, A. (1984). Historical and contemporary policies of women’s education in Saudi Arabia (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

AlMunajjed, M. (2009).Women’s education in Saudi Arabia: The way forward. Retrieved from Booz & Co., The Ideation Center,

Almutairi, N. H. (2007). The influence of educational and sociocultural factors on the learning styles and strategies of female students in Saudi Arabia (Doctoral dissertation).School of Education. Leicester, University of Leicester, U.K.

Arebi, S. (1994).Women & words in Saudi Arabia: The politics of literary discourse.New York, NY: Colombia University Press.

Bullock, K. (2002).Rethinking Muslim women and the veil: Challenging historical and modern stereotypes. Herndon, VA: International Institute of Islamic Thoughts.

Cooke, M. (2001).Women claim Islam: Creating Islamic feminism through literature. New York, NY: Routledge.

Eckert, P. M., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992) Communities of practice: Where language, gender and power all live. In K. Hall, M. Bucholtz, & B. Moonwomon (Eds.), Locating

power: Proceedings of the 1992 Berkeley women and language conference (pp. 89-99). Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group.

Eckert, P. M., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Evans, V. ( 2006). Lexical concepts, cognitive models and meaning construction.Cognitive Linguistics, 17(4), 491-534.

Feldman, K. A. (1992). College students‘ views of male and female college teachers: Part I— Evidence from the social laboratory and experiments. Research in Higher Education, 33(3), 317-375.

Hamilton, D. L. (1979).A cognitive-attributional analysis of stereotyping. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology,12, 53-84. New York: Academic Press.

Hausmann, R., Tyson, L. D., &Zahidi, S. (2009) The global gender gap report 2009. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.

Ibn-Saad, M. (1958).At-tabbaqat al-kubra. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Sadir.

Krieg, J.M. (2005). Student gender and teacher gender: What is the impact on high stakes test

scores? Current Issues in Education, 8(9). Kvale, S. (1996).Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London:


Lahelma, E. (2000). Lack of male teachers: A problem for students or teachers? Pedagogy,

Culture & Society, 8(2), 173-186. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the

mind. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. 23

Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. 2). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Mousa, K. (2013). KholoudMousa: The other face of Saudi women. saudi-women/

Office of the Auditor General of Canada. (2007). The Reliability and Validity of Survey Information. In Conducting Surveys (Section 5). Retrieved from http://www.oag-

Saudi Arabia, Ministry of Higher Education. (2010). Women in higher education: Saudi initiatives & achievements. Riyadh: Author.

Smith, E. R., &Zarate, M. A. (1992).Exemplar-based model of social judgment.Psychological Review, 99, 3-21.

Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., &Quinn, D. M. (1999).Stereotype threat and women‘s math performance.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,35, 4–28. on

Sternglanz, S. H., &Lyberger-Ficek, S. (1977). Sex differences in student–teacher interactions in the college classroom.Sex Roles, 3(4), 345-352.

Sullivan, P. (2001). Gender differences and the online classroom: Male and female college students evaluate their experiences. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 25(10), 805-818.

Syed, M. (2004).The position of women in Islam: A progressive view. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.

UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2009). Global education digest 2009. Montreal, QC: Author.

VázquezHermosilla, S. (2013). I bought my son an iPad and my daughter an iPod.The wife got me an iPhone and I got her an iRon.Indirect Linguistic Sexism in Computer- MediatedCommunication: An Analysis of Cosmopolitan andMen‘s Health’s Online Forums (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat de València, València, Spain.

World Bank.(2008). Investment in education. In The road not traveled : Education reform in the Middle East and North Africa. Retrieved Jan 29, 2012, from


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Copyright (c) 2015 GÉNEROS - Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies

Géneros - Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies | ISSN: 2014-3613

Legal Deposit : B.34284-2012 | |