Gender, Language, and Society: Saudi Female University Students’ Perception of the Category of Professions

Authors

  • Ghsoon Reda
  • Amani Hamdan

https://doi.org/10.17583/generos.2015.1334

Keywords:


Downloads

Abstract

 

This study concerns itself with the prevalence of gender stereotypes and classification of professions in Saudi Arabia. A survey and follow-up interview were administered to 80 female university students to determine whether young Saudi females’ classification of professions carries evaluative connotations related to gender. The results show that the subjects associate higher status (or skilled) professions with males and lower status professions with females despite the following facts: (i) Saudi women work in almost all professions, due to the rule of gender segregation and (ii) the image of women as professionals forms part of the participants' knowledge about Islam in which women are not stereotyped. The research highlights how the social experience of gender stereotyping plays a more important role than any other kind of experience in the hierarchical organization of the category of professions.


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, L. (1992). Women and gender in Islam: Historical roots of modern debate. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ali, A. (1993). Al-Qur’an: A contemporary translation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Al-Manea, A. (1984). Historical and contemporary policies of women’s education in Saudi Arabia (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Google Scholar Crossref

AlMunajjed, M. (2009).Women’s education in Saudi Arabia: The way forward. Retrieved from Booz & Co., The Ideation Center, http://www.ideationcenter.com/ideation_research/ideation_article/47143812

Google Scholar Crossref

Almutairi, N. H. (2007). The influence of educational and sociocultural factors on the learning styles and strategies of female students in Saudi Arabia (Doctoral dissertation).School of Education. Leicester, University of Leicester, U.K. http://hdl.handle.net/2381/10217

Google Scholar Crossref

Arebi, S. (1994).Women & words in Saudi Arabia: The politics of literary discourse.New York, NY: Colombia University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bullock, K. (2002).Rethinking Muslim women and the veil: Challenging historical and modern stereotypes. Herndon, VA: International Institute of Islamic Thoughts.

Google Scholar Crossref

Cooke, M. (2001).Women claim Islam: Creating Islamic feminism through literature. New York, NY: Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Eckert, P. M., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992) Communities of practice: Where language, gender and power all live. In K. Hall, M. Bucholtz, & B. Moonwomon (Eds.), Locating

Google Scholar Crossref

Google Scholar Crossref

power: Proceedings of the 1992 Berkeley women and language conference (pp. 89-99). Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group.

Google Scholar Crossref

Eckert, P. M., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Evans, V. ( 2006). Lexical concepts, cognitive models and meaning construction.Cognitive Linguistics, 17(4), 491-534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.016

Google Scholar Crossref

Feldman, K. A. (1992). College students‘ views of male and female college teachers: Part I— Evidence from the social laboratory and experiments. Research in Higher Education, 33(3), 317-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00992265

Google Scholar Crossref

Hamilton, D. L. (1979).A cognitive-attributional analysis of stereotyping. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology,12, 53-84. New York: Academic Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hausmann, R., Tyson, L. D., &Zahidi, S. (2009) The global gender gap report 2009. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ibn-Saad, M. (1958).At-tabbaqat al-kubra. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Sadir.

Google Scholar Crossref

Krieg, J.M. (2005). Student gender and teacher gender: What is the impact on high stakes test

Google Scholar Crossref

scores? Current Issues in Education, 8(9).http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume8/number9/ Kvale, S. (1996).Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London:

Google Scholar Crossref

Sage.

Google Scholar Crossref

Lahelma, E. (2000). Lack of male teachers: A problem for students or teachers? Pedagogy,

Google Scholar Crossref

Culture & Society, 8(2), 173-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14681360000200093 Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the

Google Scholar Crossref

mind. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. 23

Google Scholar Crossref

Google Scholar Crossref

Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. 2). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Mousa, K. (2013). KholoudMousa: The other face of Saudi women. http://deloittemiddleeastmatters.com/2013/03/07/kholoud-mousa-the-other-face-of- saudi-women/

Google Scholar Crossref

Office of the Auditor General of Canada. (2007). The Reliability and Validity of Survey Information. In Conducting Surveys (Section 5). Retrieved from http://www.oag- bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/meth_lp_e_19276.html

Google Scholar Crossref

Saudi Arabia, Ministry of Higher Education. (2010). Women in higher education: Saudi initiatives & achievements. Riyadh: Author.

Google Scholar Crossref

Smith, E. R., &Zarate, M. A. (1992).Exemplar-based model of social judgment.Psychological Review, 99, 3-21.

Google Scholar Crossref

Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., &Quinn, D. M. (1999).Stereotype threat and women‘s math performance.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,35, 4–28. http://www.idealibrary.com on

Google Scholar Crossref

Sternglanz, S. H., &Lyberger-Ficek, S. (1977). Sex differences in student–teacher interactions in the college classroom.Sex Roles, 3(4), 345-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00289557

Google Scholar Crossref

Sullivan, P. (2001). Gender differences and the online classroom: Male and female college students evaluate their experiences. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 25(10), 805-818. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/106689201753235930

Google Scholar Crossref

Google Scholar Crossref

Syed, M. (2004).The position of women in Islam: A progressive view. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2009). Global education digest 2009. Montreal, QC: Author.

Google Scholar Crossref

VázquezHermosilla, S. (2013). I bought my son an iPad and my daughter an iPod.The wife got me an iPhone and I got her an iRon.Indirect Linguistic Sexism in Computer- MediatedCommunication: An Analysis of Cosmopolitan andMen‘s Health’s Online Forums (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat de València, València, Spain.http://roderic.uv.es/handle/10550/29144

Google Scholar Crossref

World Bank.(2008). Investment in education. In The road not traveled : Education reform in the Middle East and North Africa. Retrieved Jan 29, 2012, from http://go.worldbank.org/JLMVU0I6R0

Google Scholar Crossref

Downloads

Published

2015-06-25

Almetric

Dimensions

How to Cite

Reda, G., & Hamdan, A. (2015). Gender, Language, and Society: Saudi Female University Students’ Perception of the Category of Professions. Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies, 4(2), 666–689. https://doi.org/10.17583/generos.2015.1334

Issue

Section

Articles