The Men Behind Economically Successful Women: A Focus on Dutch Dual-earner Couples
https://doi.org/10.4471/generos.2012.08
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
Using data from the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study, this paper compares the partners of economically successful women with those of women who have fared less well on the labor market. First, socioeconomic and attitudinal within-couple homogamy is investigated. Second, hypotheses derived from social capital theory and companionate theory are tested to examine how socioeconomic and attitudinal characteristics of male partners are related to women’s economic success. Economically successful women tend to have high-income men, suggesting an accumulation of favorable material resources. Men’s supportive behavior rather than their attitudes contribute to their wives’ economic success.Downloads
References
Avellar, D.F., & Smock, P.J. (2003). Has the price of motherhood declined over time? A cross-cohort comparison of the motherhood wage penalty. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65, 597-607.
Google Scholar CrossrefBecker, G.S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefBeckers, I., Hermans, B., & Portegijs, W. (2009). Betaalde arbeid [Paid work]. In A. Merens & B. Hermans (Eds.), Emancipatiemonitor 2008. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
Google Scholar CrossrefBernardi, F. (1999). Does the husband matter? Married women and employment in Italy. European Sociological Review, 15, 285-300.
Google Scholar CrossrefBernasco, W., De Graaf, P.M., & Ultee, W. (1998). Coupled careers: Effects of spouse’s resources on occupational attainment in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 14, 15-31.
Google Scholar CrossrefBianchi, S.M., Milkie, M.A. Sayer, L.C., & Robinson, J.P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191-228.
Google Scholar CrossrefBittman, M., England, P., Folbre,N., Sayer, L., & Matheson, G. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 186-214.
Google Scholar CrossrefBlossfeld, H.-P., & Hofmeister, H. (Eds.). (2006). Globalization, uncertainty, and women’s careers: An international comparison. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Google Scholar CrossrefBorrelli, M.A. (2002). The president’s cabinet: Gender, power, and representation. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Google Scholar CrossrefBlair, S.L., & Lichter, T.D. (1991). Measuring the division of household labor: Gender segregation of housework among American couples. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 91-113.
Google Scholar CrossrefBrayfield, A. (1992). Employment resources and housework in Canada. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 19-30.
Google Scholar CrossrefBrennan, R., Barnett, T., & Gareis, K. C. (2001). When she earns more than he does: A longitudinal study of dual-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 168-182.
Google Scholar CrossrefBrines, J. (1993). The exchange value of housework. Rationality & Society, 5, 302-340.
Google Scholar CrossrefBrines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652-688.
Google Scholar CrossrefBrines, J., & Joyner, K. (1999). The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review, 64, 333-355.
Google Scholar CrossrefBrynin, M., & Francesconi, M. (2004). The material returns to partnership: The effects of educational matching on labor market outcomes and gender equality. European Sociological Review, 20, 363-377.
Google Scholar CrossrefBrynin, M., Schupp, J. (2000). Education, employment, and gender inequality amongst couples: A comparative analysis of Britain and Germany. European Sociological Review, 16, 349-365.
Google Scholar CrossrefBudig, M. J. (2004). Feminism and the family. In Scott, J.L., Treas, J.K., & Richards, M. (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to the sociology of families . Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Google Scholar CrossrefBudig, M. J., & England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 66, 204-225.
Google Scholar CrossrefCBS (2011). Inkomensverdeling 2003 naar persoonskenmerken [Distribution pattern of income in 2003, by individual characterstics]. Statline. Retrieved from statline.cbs.nl on August 30 2011
Google Scholar CrossrefCohen, Ph. N. (2002). Cohabitation and the declining marriage premium for men. Work and Occupations, 29, 346-363.
Google Scholar CrossrefColtrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1208-1233.
Google Scholar CrossrefColtrane, S., & Ishii-Kuntz, M. (1992). Men’s housework: A life course perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 43-57.
Google Scholar CrossrefCooke, L. P. (2006). “Doing” gender in context: Household bargaining and risk of divorce in Germany and the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 442-472.
Google Scholar CrossrefCooke, L. P., & Baxter, J. (2010). “Families” in international context: Comparing institutional effects across Western societies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 516-536.
Google Scholar CrossrefCooke, L. P. (2011). Gender-class equality in political economies. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefDavis, S. N., Greenstein, T.N. & Gerteisen Marks, J.P. (2007). Effects of union type on division of household labor: do cohabiting men really perform more housework? Journal of Family Issues, 28, 1246-1272.
Google Scholar CrossrefDe Hoog, S., Van Egten, C., & De Jong, T. (2010). Vrouwen en financiële zelfredzaamheid. Een onderzoek naar de kenmerken van financieel kwetsbare vrouwen [Women and financial independence: A study on the characteristics of financially vulnerable women]. Den Haag: E-Quality.
Google Scholar CrossrefDe Leeuw, E. D., & De Heer, W. (2001). Trends in household survey nonresponse: A longitudinal and international comparison. In R. M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge & R.J.A. Little (Eds.), Survey Nonresponse. New York: Wiley.
Google Scholar CrossrefDykstra, P.A., & Fokkema, T. (2000). Partner en kinderen: belemmerend of bevorderend voor beroepssucces? Beroepsmobiliteit van mannen en vrouwen met verschillende huwelijks- en ouderschapscarrières [Partner and children: obstacle or stimulus for occupational success? Occupational mobility of men and women with different marital and parental careers]. Mens & Maatschappij, 75, 110-128.
Google Scholar CrossrefDykstra, P.A., Kalmijn, M., & Knijn, T.C.M., Komter, A.E., Liefbroer, A.C. & Mulder, C.H. (2005). Codebook of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study: A multi-actor, multi-method panel study on solidarity in family relationships, wave 1. July 2005, Version 1. NKPS Working Paper No 4. Den Haag: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute.
Google Scholar CrossrefDykstra, P.A., & Poortman, A. (2010). Economic resources and remaining single: Trends over time. European Sociological Review, 26, 277-290..
Google Scholar CrossrefEngland, P. (2010). The gender revolution. Gender & Society, 24, 149-166.
Google Scholar CrossrefEngland, P., & Li, S. (2006). Desegregation stalled: The changing gender composition of college majors 1971-2002. Gender & Society, 20, 656-677.
Google Scholar CrossrefEsping-Andersen, G. (2009). The incomplete revolution. Adapting to women’s new roles. Cambridge: Polity.
Google Scholar CrossrefGash, V. (2009). Sacrificing their careers for their families? An analysis of the penalty to motherhood in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 93, 569-586.
Google Scholar CrossrefGerson, K. (2009). The unfinished revolution: How a new generation is reshaping family, work, and gender in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefGorman, E.H., & Kmec, J.A. (2009). Hierarchical rank and women’s organizational mobility: Glass ceilings in corporate law firms. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 1428-1474.
Google Scholar CrossrefGreenstein, T.N. (1996). Husband’s participation in the domestic division of labour. European Sociological Review, 21, 23-41.
Google Scholar CrossrefGreenstein, T.N. (2000). Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: A replication and extension. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 322-335.
Google Scholar CrossrefGupta, S. (2007). Autonomy, dependence, or display? The relationship between married women’s earnings and housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 399-417.
Google Scholar CrossrefHallenbeck, Ph. (1966). An analysis of power dynamics in marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 28, 200-203.
Google Scholar CrossrefHartgers, M., & Portegijs, W. (2009). Onderwijs [Education]. In: A. Merens & B. Hermans (Eds.), Emancipatiemonitor 2008. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
Google Scholar CrossrefHenz, U., & Sundström, M. (2001). Partner choice and women’s paid work in Sweden: The role of earnings. European Sociological Review, 17, 295-316.
Google Scholar CrossrefHochschild, A.R. (1989). The second shift. Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.
Google Scholar CrossrefJong, A. de & Liefbroer, A.C. (1998). Schalen in de PSIN: Resultaten van schaalanalyses op gegevens uit een panel studie [Sclaes in the PSIN: Results of scale analyses using panel study data]. The Hague: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute
Google Scholar CrossrefKalmijn, M., Bernasco, W., & Weesie, J. (1996). Households in the Netherlands 1995 – Huishoudens in Nederland 1995. Codebook of HIN95. Utrecht University: ISCORE paper # 67.
Google Scholar CrossrefKalmijn, M., Graaf, P.M. de, & Uunk, W. (2000). Codeboek van het survey Scheiding in Nederland 1998 [Codebook of the survey Divorce in the Netherlands]. ICS Codebook # 40, Utrecht University: Department of Sociology/Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology.
Google Scholar CrossrefKalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 349-372.
Google Scholar CrossrefKerr, B., Miller, W., & Reid, M. (2002). Sex-based occupational segregation in U.S. state bureaucracies, 1987-97. Public Administration Review, 62, 412-23.
Google Scholar CrossrefKorenman, S., & Neumark, D. (1991). Does marriage really make men more productive. Journal of Human Resources, 26, 282-307.
Google Scholar CrossrefLewis, J., Knijn, T., Martin, C., & Ostner, I. (2008). Patterns of development in work/family reconciliation policies in France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK in the 2000’s. Social Policy, 15, 261-286.
Google Scholar CrossrefLin, N., Vaughn, J. C., & Ensel, W. M. (1981). Social resources and occupational status attainment. Social Forces, 59, 1163-1181.
Google Scholar CrossrefLückerath-Rovers, M. (2009). The Dutch Female Board Index 2008. Erasmus Institute Monitoring & Compliance. Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Google Scholar CrossrefMare, R.D. (1991). Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review, 56, 15-32.
Google Scholar CrossrefMcLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the Second Demographic Transition. Demography, 41, 607-627.
Google Scholar CrossrefMeier, J.A., McNaughton-Cassill, M., & Lynch, M. (2006). The management of household and childcare tasks and relationship satisfaction in dual-earner families. Marriage & Family Review, 40, 61-88.
Google Scholar CrossrefMeier, K.J., & Wilkins, V.M. (2002). Gender differences in agency head salaries: The case of public education. Public Administration Review, 62, 405-411.
Google Scholar CrossrefOppenheimer, V.K. (1997). Women’s employment and the gain to marriage: The specialization and trading model. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 431-453.
Google Scholar CrossrefPollman-Schult, M. (2011). Marriage and earnings: Why do married men earn more than single men? European Sociological Review, 27, 147-163.
Google Scholar CrossrefPixley, J.E. (2008). Life course patterns of career-prioritizing decisions and occupational attainment in dual-earner couples. Work and Occupations, 35, 127-163.
Google Scholar CrossrefPress, J.E. (2004). Cute butts and housework: A gynocentric theory of assortative mating. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1029-1033.
Google Scholar CrossrefSchoen, R., & Cheng, Y-H. A. (2006). Partner choice and the differential retreat from marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1-10.
Google Scholar CrossrefSigle-Rushton, W., & Waldfogel, J. (2007). Motherhood and women’s earnings in Anglo-American, Continental European, and Nordic countries. Feminist Economics, 13, 55-91.
Google Scholar CrossrefSmits, J., Ultee, W., & Lammers,J. (1998). Educational homogamy in 65 countries: An explanation of differences in openness using country-level explanatory variables. American Sociological Review, 63, 264-285.
Google Scholar CrossrefStorvik, A. E., & Schöne, P. (2008). In search of the glass ceiling and recruitment to management in Norway’s state bureaucracy. British Journal of Sociology, 59, 729-755.
Google Scholar CrossrefSullivan, O. (2006). Changing gender relations, changing families. Tracing the pace of change over time. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Google Scholar CrossrefSundström, M., & Duvander, A-Z. E. (2002). Gender division of childcare and the sharing of parental leave among new parents in Sweden. European Sociological Review, 18, 433-447.
Google Scholar CrossrefSweeney, M.M. (2002.) Two decades of family change: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. American Sociological Review, 67, 132-147.
Google Scholar CrossrefSweeney, M.M., & Cancian, M. (2004). The changing importance of white women’s economic prospects for assortative mating. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1015-1028.
Google Scholar CrossrefThatcher, M. (1993). The Downing Street years. Hammersmith, UK: Harper Collins.
Google Scholar CrossrefVerbakel, E., & De Graaf, P.M. (2009). Partner effects on labour market participation and job level: Opposing mechanisms. Work, Employment and Society, 23, 635-654.
Google Scholar CrossrefVerbakel, E., & De Graaf, P.M (2008). Resources of the partner: Support or restriction in the occupational career? Developments in the Netherlands between 1940 and 2003. European Sociological Review, 24, 81-95.
Google Scholar CrossrefVerbakel, E., Luijkx, R., & De Graaf, P.M. (2008). The association between husbands’ and wives’ labor market positions in the Netherlands. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 26, 257-276.
Google Scholar CrossrefVerweij, A. (2002). Rapportage pilot-study schriftelijke vragenlijst Netherlands Kinship Panel Study [Report of the pilot study of the self-completion questionnaire of the NKPS]. NKPS Working Paper, no. 3.
Google Scholar CrossrefVisser, J. (2002). The first part-time economy in the world: a model to be followed? Journal of European Social Policy, 12, 23-42
Google Scholar CrossrefWest, C., & Zimmerman, D.H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125-151.
Google Scholar CrossrefWaldfogel, J. (1997). The effect of children on women’s wages. American Sociological Review, 62, 209-217.
Google Scholar CrossrefWilcox, W.B., & Nock, S. (2006). What’s love got to do with it? Equality, equity, commitment and women’s marital quality. Social Forces, 84, 1331-1345.
Google Scholar CrossrefWinslow-Bowe, S. (2009). Husbands’ and wives’ relative earnings; Exploring variation by race, human capital, labor supply, and life stage. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 1405-1332.
Google Scholar CrossrefWirth, L. (2004). Breaking through the glass ceiling: Women in management. Update 2004.
Google Scholar CrossrefGeneva: International Labour Office.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.