Incentivizing with Bonus in a College Statistics Course

Authors

  • Victoria Ingalls Tiffin Unniversity

https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.2018.2497

Downloads

Abstract

Many studies have argued the negative effects of external rewards on internal motivation while others assert that external motivation does not necessarily undermine intrinsic motivation. At a private university, students were given the option to earn bonus points for achieving mastery in the online homework systems associated with Statistics and Pre-Calculus courses. The results showed a significant difference in online homework grades and final exam scores, dependent upon when the incentive was given. The findings of this research suggest that college students thrive when incentivized. When compared to the students who were not incentivized, the incentivized group had a statistically significantly higher mean for both online homework scores and final exam scores. Many of the incentivized students chose to take the opportunity to earn the bonus points to increase the final semester grade, which apparently also helped to increase the content knowledge necessary for the final exam.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Victoria Ingalls, Tiffin Unniversity

Associate Professor of Mathematics

References

Akin-Little, K., Eckert, T., Lovett, B., & Little, S. (2004). Extrinsic reinforcement in the classroom: Bribery or best practice. School Psychology Review, 33(3), 344-362.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bailey, M., Rosenthal, J., & Yoon, A. (2016). Grades and incentives: Assessing completing grade point average measures and postgraduate outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 41(9), 1548-1562.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Google Scholar Crossref

Black, A., & Deci, E. (2000).The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740-756.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Cameron, J., Banko, K., & Pierce, D. (2001). Pervasive negative effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation. The Behavior Analyst, 24 (1), 1-44.

Google Scholar Crossref

Cameron, J. & Pierce, D. (1994) Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64, 363-423.

Google Scholar Crossref

Deci, E. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105-115.

Google Scholar Crossref

Deci, E. (1975). Intrinsic motivations. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Deci, E., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B., & Leone, D. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determining perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119-142.

Google Scholar Crossref

Deci, E., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. (1999a). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627-668.

Google Scholar Crossref

Deci, E., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. (1999b). The undermining effect is a reality after all- extrinsic rewards, task interest, and self-determination. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 692-700.

Google Scholar Crossref

Deci, E., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71, 1-27.

Google Scholar Crossref

DeVahl, J., King, R., & Williamson, J. (2005). Academic incentives for students can increase participation in and effectiveness of a physical education program. Journal of American College Health. 53(6), 295-298.

Google Scholar Crossref

Harlow, H., Harlow, M. & Meyer, D. (1950). Learning motivated by manipulative drive. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 228-234.

Google Scholar Crossref

Jung, Y., Leung, A., & Miller, J. (2016). Do smart students study harder? An investigation of efficient effort among undergraduate university students. Journal of Economics and Economics Education, 17(1), 25-38.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kohn, A. (1993). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A’s, praise, and other bribes. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kohn, A. (1996). By all available means: Cameron and Pierce’s defense of extrinsic motivators. Review of Educational Research, 66, 1-3.

Google Scholar Crossref

Leper, M. (1983). Extrinsic reward and intrinsic motivations: Implications for the classroom. In J.M. Levine & M.C. Wang (Eds.), Teacher and student perceptions: Implications for learning (pp. 281-317). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Google Scholar Crossref

Miller, M., & Mallott, R. (1997). The importance of overt responding in programmed instruction even with added incentives for learning. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7(4), 497-503.

Google Scholar Crossref

Nonis, S., Ford, C., Logan, L., & Hudson, G. (1996). College student’s blood donation behavior: relationship to demographics, perceived risks, and incentives. Health Marketing Quarterly, 13(4), 33.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pittman, T., Boggiano, A. & Ruble, D. (1983). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations: Limiting conditions on the undermining and enhancing effects of reward on intrinsic motivation. In J.M. Levine & M.C. Wang (Eds.), Teacher and student perceptions: Implications for learning (pp. 319-340). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Google Scholar Crossref

Rassouli, A. (2012). Engagement in classroom learning: Creating temporal participation incentives for extrinsically motivated students through bonus credits. Journal of Education for Business, 87, 86-93.

Google Scholar Crossref

Rousu, M., Corrigan, J., Harris, D., Hayter, J.,Houser, S., Lafrancois, B., Onafowora, O., Colson, G., Hoffer, A. (2015). Do monetary incentives matter in classroom experiments? Effects on course performance. Journal of Economics Education, 46(4), 341-349.

Google Scholar Crossref

Rummell, A. & Fielding, R. (1988). Cognitive evaluation theory: a meta-analysis review of the literature. Social Behavior and Personality, 16, 147-164.

Google Scholar Crossref

Tudor, R.M., & Bostow, D.E. (1991). Computer-programmed instruction: The relation required interaction to practical application. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 361-368.

Google Scholar Crossref

Vasteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Deci, E. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19-31.

Google Scholar Crossref

Vasteenkiste, M., Lens, W., DeWitte, S., DeWitte, H., Deci, E. (2004).The “why and “why not” of job search behavior: Their relation to job searching, unemployment experience and well-being. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 346-363.

Google Scholar Crossref

Downloads

Published

2018-02-24

Almetric

Dimensions

Issue

Section

Articles