Ways of Masculinity in Online Dating Profiles: the Cases of Meetic.es and AdoptaUnTio.es

Authors

https://doi.org/10.17583/mcs.2017.2709

Keywords:


Downloads

Abstract

The analysis of masculinity has been a topic of growing interest in recent decades. Its study has incorporated a wide and diverse range of research areas and themes, including the representation of gender relations and identities on the Internet. Specifically, this article concerns the research area related to online dating websites and aims to compare the principal current tendencies related to identity -as provided by research on masculinity- with the way that men present themselves on two Spanish dating websites: Meetic.es and AdoptaUnTio.es. These types of virtual spaces have specific characteristics that facilitate the analysis of the masculine ideal among their users; or at least the characteristics that these men consider attractive to women. This research was carried out through a qualitative analysis supported by Atlas-ti. The principal results highlight the presence of traces of the so called egalitarian masculinity within predominant forms of traditional masculinity, characterized by a minimal process of reflection and introspection on the part of users of these websites. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Eva Espinar-Ruiz, University of Alicante

Profesora Titular de Universidad en el Departamento de Sociología II
Secretaria del Instituto Interuniversitario de Desarrollo Social y Paz (IUDESP)

Ismael Ocampo, University of Alicante

Grado en Sociología (Universidad de Alicante).
Máster en Dinámicas de cambio en las sociedades modernas avanzadas (Universidad Pública de Navarra)

References

Anderson, E. (2008). Inclusive masculinity in a fraternal setting. Men and masculinities, 10, 604-620

Google Scholar Crossref

Badinter, E., (1993). XY: la identidad masculina. Madrid. Alianza editorial

Google Scholar Crossref

Bak, P. (2010). Sex Differences in the Attractiveness Halo Effect in the Online Dating Environment. Journal of Business and Media Psychology, 1, 1-7

Google Scholar Crossref

Barraket, J. & Henry-Waring, M. S. (2008). Getting it on (line) Sociological perspectives on e-dating. Journal of Sociology, 44(2), 149-165.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bordo, S. (1999). The Male Body: A New Look at Men in Public and in Private. Nueva York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bourdieu, P. (2000). La dominación masculina. Buenos Aires: Anagrama.

Google Scholar Crossref

Braun V. & Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Google Scholar Crossref

Carabí, À. (2000). Construyendo nuevas masculinidades: una introducción. In À. Carabi & M. Segarra (Eds.), Nuevas masculinidades (pp.15-27). Barcelona: Icaria.

Google Scholar Crossref

Carabi, À. & M. Segarra (Eds.) (2000). Nuevas masculinidades. Barcelona: Icaria.

Google Scholar Crossref

Casemiro, C. (2014). Portuguese online dating: explorando las diferencias de género en la presentación personal. Revista Teknokultura, 11 (1), 117-141.

Google Scholar Crossref

Chappetta, K., &, Barth, J. M. (2016). How gender role stereotypes affect attraction in an online dating scenario. Computers in human behavior, 63, 738–746

Google Scholar Crossref

Chaulet, J. (2009). La construcción equipada del vínculo amoroso. Las webs de encuentros y sus «caminos de confianza». Redes: revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales, 16(4)

Google Scholar Crossref

Coll-Planas, G. & Missé, M. (2015). “Me gustaría ser militar”. Reproducción de la masculinidad hegemónica en la patologización de la transexualidad. Prisma social: revista de investigación social, 13, 407-432.

Google Scholar Crossref

Connell, R.W, (1995). Masculinidades. México D.F: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Programa Universitario de Estudios de Género.

Google Scholar Crossref

Duncanson. C. (2015). Hegemonic masculinity and the possibility of change in gender relationship. Men and masculinities, 18, 1-18

Google Scholar Crossref

Ellison, D., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 11(2), 415-441.

Google Scholar Crossref

Finkel, E.J., Eastwick, P.W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 3– 66.

Google Scholar Crossref

Fiore, A.T., Taylor, L.S., Mendelsohn, G.A. & Hearst, M. (2008). Assessing attractiveness in online dating profiles. In Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 797-806). ACM. https://www.ischool.berkeley.edu/research/publications/2008/assessing-attractiveness-online-dating-profiles [accessed on 21/04/2017].

Google Scholar Crossref

Fullick, M. (2013) "Gendering" the Self in Online Dating Discourse. Canadian Journal of Communication, 38(4), 545-562.

Google Scholar Crossref

Goffman, E. (2008). La presentación de la persona en la vida cotidiana. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

Google Scholar Crossref

González García, J. (2010). Atrapados en la red-Las nuevas redes románticas. Kairos: Revista de temas sociales, 14 (25).

Google Scholar Crossref

Guash, O. (2008). Los varones en perspectiva de género. Teorías y experiencias de discriminación. Asparkía. Investigació feminista, 19, 29-38.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gutmann, M. C. (1998). Traficando con hombres: la antropología de la masculinidad. La ventana. 8, 47-99.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hernández Ochoa, D. (2011). La “confluencia” de los géneros a través del sistema mediático: De la mujer sumisa y el macho ibérico al “ser andrógino”. Papers: revista de sociología. 96(2), 569-587.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hitsch, G. J., Hortaçsu, A. & Ariely, D. (2010). What makes you click?—Mate preferences in online dating. Quantitative marketing and Economics, 8(4), 393-427.

Google Scholar Crossref

Illouz, E. (2006) Intimidades congeladas. Las emociones en el capitalismo. Madrid: Katz editores.

Google Scholar Crossref

Johansson, T. & Ottemo, A. (2013). Ruptures in hegemonic masculinity: the dialectic between ideology and utopia. Journal of gender studies, 24(2), 192-206

Google Scholar Crossref

Kaufman, M. (1999). La construcción de la masculinidad y la triada de la violencia. In Violencia doméstica (pp. 52-69). Cuernava-Morelos (México): Cidhal, PRODEC, Centro de Documentación Betsie Hollants.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kimmel, M. S. (1993). Invisible Masculinity. Society, 30 (6), 28-35

Google Scholar Crossref

Lomas, T. (2013). Critical Positive Masculinity. Masculinity and social change, 2(1), 165-183.

Google Scholar Crossref

Marcus, S. (2014). Online dating profile analysis: The intersection of identity, gender & religion. Proceedings of the New York State Communication Association, 8, 1-15

Google Scholar Crossref

Martínez-Lirola, M. (2012). Aproximación a la interacción virtual: el caso de la red social Badoo. Palabra Clave, 15 (1), 107-127.

Google Scholar Crossref

Mira, A. (2015). Mario Casas y el hombre “Depornosexual”: La “espectacularización erótica del cuerpo masculino. Área abierta, 15(1), 15-30.

Google Scholar Crossref

Morgan, E. M., Richards, T.C., & VanNess, E.M. (2010). Comparing narratives of personal and preferred partner characteristics in online dating advertisements. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 883-888.

Google Scholar Crossref

O’Neill, R. (2015). Whiter critical masculinity studies? Notes on inclusive masculinity theory, postfeminism, and sexual politics. Men and masculinities, 18(1), 100-120

Google Scholar Crossref

Padrós, M. (2012). Modelos de Atractivo Masculinos en la Adolescencia. Masculinities and Social Change, 1 (2), 165-183.

Google Scholar Crossref

Peacock, D., & Barker, G. (2014). Working with men and boys to prevent gender-based violence: principles, lessons, learned, and ways forward. Men and masculinities, 17(5), 578-599.

Google Scholar Crossref

Portell, D., & Pulido, C. (2012). Communicative acts which promote new masculinities. Overcoming hegemonic masculinity in the workplace and school. Masculinities and Social Change, 1(1), 61-80.

Google Scholar Crossref

Rosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a mate the rise of the internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 523-547.

Google Scholar Crossref

Sanfélix, J. (2011). Las nuevas masculinidades. Los hombres frente al cambio en las mujeres. Prisma Social: revista de ciencias sociales, 7: 220-247.

Google Scholar Crossref

Subirats, M. (2007). Ser hombres. In M. Castells & M. Subirats (Eds.), Mujeres y Hombres: ¿Un amor imposible? (pp.49-135). Madrid: Ed Alianza.

Google Scholar Crossref

Valles, M. S. (2000). Técnicas cualitativas de investigación social. Madrid: Síntesis Editorial.

Google Scholar Crossref

Walker, L. & Eller, J. (2016), Raising Capital: Claims of Masculinity among Men on Match.com, Men and Masculinities, 19 (1): 42-63.

Google Scholar Crossref

Wang, Y.J. (2012). Internet dating sites as heterotopias of gender performance: A case study of Taiwanese heterosexual male daters. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(5), 485-500.

Google Scholar Crossref

Downloads

Published

2017-10-21

Almetric

Dimensions

How to Cite

Espinar-Ruiz, E., & Ocampo, I. (2017). Ways of Masculinity in Online Dating Profiles: the Cases of Meetic.es and AdoptaUnTio.es. Masculinities &Amp; Social Change, 6(3), 196–216. https://doi.org/10.17583/mcs.2017.2709

Issue

Section

Articles