Cooperative Learning: Developments in Research

Authors

  • Robyn M. Gillies The University of Queensland

https://doi.org/10.4471/ijep.2014.08

Keywords:


Downloads

Abstract

Cooperative learning is widely recognized as a pedagogical practice that promotes socialization and learning among students from kindergarten through to college level and across different subject areas. Cooperative learning involves students working together to achieve common goals or complete group tasks. Interest in cooperative learning has grown rapidly over the last three decades as research has been published that clearly demonstrates how it can be used to promote achievements in reading and writing, conceptual development in science, problem-solving in mathematics, and higher level thinking and reasoning. It has also been shown to promote inter-personal relationships with students with diverse learning and adjustments needs and with those from culturally and ethnically different backgrounds. In fact, Johnson and Johnson (2000)argue there is no other pedagogical practice that achieves such outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to review the research on cooperative learning and to examine the factors that contribute to its success. In particular, the review focuses on the key elements that underpin successful cooperative learning, including group structure, composition and task, and the key role teachers’ play in developing students’ thinking and learning. The intention is to provide insights on how teachers can effectively utilize this pedagogical approach to teaching and learning in their classrooms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, V. (I976). Children helping children: Psychological processes in tutoring. In J. Levin and

Google Scholar Crossref

V. Allen (Eds.), Cognitive learning in children: Theories and strategies (pp. 241-299). NewYork: Academic Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bertucci, A., Conte, S., Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2010). The impact of size of cooperative

Google Scholar Crossref

group on achievement, social support, and self-esteem. The Journal of General Psychology, 137, 256-272.

Google Scholar Crossref

Cohen, E. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review

Google Scholar Crossref

of Educational Research, 64, 1-35.

Google Scholar Crossref

Damon, W. (1984). Peer education: The untapped potential. Journal of Applied

Google Scholar Crossref

Developmental Psychology, 5, 331-343.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gartner, A., Kholer, M., & Riesman, F. (1971). Children teach children: Learning by teaching.

Google Scholar Crossref

New York: Harper & Row.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gillies, R. (2011). Promoting thinking, problem-solving, and reasoning during small group

Google Scholar Crossref

discussions. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17, 73-89.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gillies, R. (2008). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students’

Google Scholar Crossref

behaviours, discourse and learning during a science-based learning activity. School Psychology International, 29, 328-347

Google Scholar Crossref

Gillies, R. (2006). Teachers’ and students’ verbal behaviours during cooperative and small-group

Google Scholar Crossref

learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 271-287.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gillies, R. (2004). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students during small group learning. Learning and Instruction, 14, 197- 213.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gillies, R. (2003). The behaviours, interactions, and perceptions of junior high school students during small-group learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 137-147.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gillies, R. & Haynes, M. (2011). Increasing explanatory behaviour, problem-solving and reasoning within classes using cooperative group work. Instructional Science, 39, 349-366.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gillies, R., & Khan, A. (2008). The effects of teacher discourse on students’ discourse, problem-solving and reasoning during cooperative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 323-340.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gillies, R., & Khan, A. (2009). Promoting reasoned argumentation, problem-solving and learning during small-group work. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39, 7-27.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gillies, R., Nichols, K., Burgh, G., & Haynes, M. (2012). The effects of two meta-cognitive questioning approaches on children’s explanatory behaviour, problem-solving, and learning during cooperative, inquiry-based science. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 93-106.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1989). Cooperation and helping in the classroom: A contextual approach. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 113-119.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., & Shachar, H. (1990). Teachers’ verbal behavior in cooperative and whole-class instruction (pp. 77-94). In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research. New York: Praeger.

Google Scholar Crossref

Howe, C. (2013). Optimizing small group discourse in classrooms: Effective

Google Scholar Crossref

practices and theoretical constraints. International Journal of Educational Research, 63, 107-115.

Google Scholar Crossref

Howe, C. (2009). Collaborative group work in middle childhood. Human Development, 52, 215-

Google Scholar Crossref

Google Scholar Crossref

Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2002). Learning together and alone: Overview and meta-analysis.

Google Scholar Crossref

Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22, 95-105.

Google Scholar Crossref

Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2000). Cooperative learning, values, and culturally plural

Google Scholar Crossref

classrooms. In. M. Leicester, C. Modgil, & S. Modgil (Eds.), Classroom issues: Practice, pedagogy and curriculum (pp 15-28). Palmer Press: London.

Google Scholar Crossref

Johnson, D., Johnson, R., Stanne, M., & Garibaldi, A. (1990). Impact of group processing on

Google Scholar Crossref

achievement in cooperative groups. The Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 504-516.

Google Scholar Crossref

Johnson, D., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., &Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative,

Google Scholar Crossref

competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 47-62.

Google Scholar Crossref

Lou, Y., Abrami, P., Spence, J., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d’Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 423-458.

Google Scholar Crossref

Lou, Y., Abrami, P., & d’Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 449-521.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pai, H., Sears, D., & Maeda, Y. (2014). Effects of small-group learning on transfer: A meta-

Google Scholar Crossref

analysis. Educational Psychology Review. DOI 10.1007/s10648-014-9260-8

Google Scholar Crossref

Roseth, C., Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and

Google Scholar Crossref

peerrelartionships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 223-246.

Google Scholar Crossref

Shachar, H., & Sharan, S. (1994). Talking, relating, and achieving: Effects of cooperative

Google Scholar Crossref

learning and whole-class instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 313-353.

Google Scholar Crossref

Sharan, S., &Shaulov, A. (1990). Cooperative learning, motivation to learn, and academic

Google Scholar Crossref

achievement (pp.77-94). In S. Sharan (Ed.). Cooperative learning: Theory and research. Praeger: New York.

Google Scholar Crossref

Slavin, R. (2013). Effective programmes in reading and mathematics: Evidence from the Best

Google Scholar Crossref

Evidence Encyclopedia. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24, 383-391.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2013.797913

Google Scholar Crossref

Slavin, R. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what

Google Scholar Crossref

we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43-69.

Google Scholar Crossref

Slavin, R., & Lake, C. (2008). Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A best evidence

Google Scholar Crossref

synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78, 427-515.

Google Scholar Crossref

Slavin, R., & Cooper, R. (1999). Improving intergroup relations: Lessons learned from

Google Scholar Crossref

cooperative learning programs. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 647-663.

Google Scholar Crossref

Stevens, R., & Slavin, R. (1995a). The cooperative elementary school: Effects on students’

Google Scholar Crossref

achievement, attitudes, and social relations. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 321-351.

Google Scholar Crossref

Stevens, R., &Slavin, R. (1995b). Effects of a cooperative learning approach in reading and

Google Scholar Crossref

writing on academically handicapped and non handicapped students.The Elementary School Journal, 95, 241-262.

Google Scholar Crossref

Thurston, A., Topping, K., Tolmie, A., Chrristie, D., karagiannidou, E., & Murray, P. (2010).

Google Scholar Crossref

Cooperative learning in science: Follow-up from primary to high school. International

Google Scholar Crossref

Journal of Science Education, 32, 501-522.

Google Scholar Crossref

Downloads

Published

2014-06-24

Almetric

Dimensions

How to Cite

Gillies, R. M. (2014). Cooperative Learning: Developments in Research. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 3(2), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.4471/ijep.2014.08

Issue

Section

Articles