Contribuciones de la mujer gitana a la ciencia, a las políticas y a la mejora social

Authors

  • Tania Garcia University of Barcelona

https://doi.org/10.17583/generos.2015.1721

Keywords:


Abstract

The triple exclusion suffered by many Romaní women inEurope(on grounds of gender, ethnicity and, in many cases, low academic level) did not impede that they become today the engine for the transformation to improve their people’s life conditions. This article is based on a documental review on the impact of communicative methodology of research on public policies addressed to the Romani people and also on the improvement of their life conditions. Our analysis focuses specially on the role of Romani women throughout the whole process, in which they have been protagonists and end users at the same. Their communities and society as a whole also took benefit of Romani women’s contributions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abajo, J., & Carrasco, S. (2004). Experiencias y trayectorias de éxito escolar de gitanas y gitanos en España. Madrid: CIDE Instituto de la Mujer.

Google Scholar Crossref

Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bereményi, B. A. (2007). Relaciones y experiencias de los gitanos y los rom con la escuela. Una aproximación comparativa. Perifèria. Revista de recerca i formació en antropologia, 6, 1-25.

Google Scholar Crossref

Cavalli Sforza, L., & Cavalli Sforza, F. (1994). ¿Quiénes somos?. Historia de la diversidad humana. Barcelona: Editorial Crítica.

Google Scholar Crossref

Centro de Estudios Gitanos (CEG). (2010). Acta consejo asesor. Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona.

Google Scholar Crossref

CIS. (2006). Encuesta sociológica a hogares de la población gitana. Estudio CIS nº 2664: Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales.

Google Scholar Crossref

Council of Europe. (2013). 4th Internationsl Conference on romani Women. Helsinki.

Google Scholar Crossref

Council of the European Union. (2011). Council Conclusions on an EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies Up to 2020, 3098, Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council meeting Cong.

Google Scholar Crossref

CREA. (2000-2003). Brudila Callí: Las mujeres gitanas contra la exclusión. Superación del absentismo y el fracaso escolar de las niñas y adolescentes gitanas. Plan Nacional I+D+I. Instituto de la Mujer, Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología, Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales.

Google Scholar Crossref

CREA. (2001-2004). WORKALÓ, The creation of new occupational patterns for cultural minorities. The gypsy case. FP5, DG Research, European Commission.

Google Scholar Crossref

CREA. (2003-2004). Callí Butipen: mujer gitana y mercado laboral . Plan Nacional I+D+I. Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología, Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales-Instituto de la Mujer.

Google Scholar Crossref

Denzin, N. K., & Giardina, M. D. (2007). Ethical futures in qualitative research: Decolonizing the politics of knowledge. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Domínguez, C., Flecha, A., & Fernández, M. (2004). Mujeres gitanas y mercado laboral: mecanismos para superar su triple exclusión. Lan Harremanak/11, 2, 81-93.

Google Scholar Crossref

Drom Kotar Mestipen. (2011). Conclusiones del I Congreso Internacional de Mujeres Gitanas: Las Otras Mujeres. Retrieved from http://dromkotar.org/es/?page_id=80

Google Scholar Crossref

European Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA). (2012). The situation of Roma in 11 EU Member States. Survey results at a glance. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Google Scholar Crossref

European Commission (Directorate General for Employment and Social Affairs). (2004). The Situation of the Roma in an Enlarged European Union: Fundamental Rights & Anti-discrimination. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Google Scholar Crossref

European Commission (Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities). (2010). Improving the tools for the social inclusion and non-discrimination of Roma in the EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Google Scholar Crossref

European Commission. (2010). COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS. The social and economic integration of the Roma in Europe, COM(2010). Brussels.

Google Scholar Crossref

European Commission. (2011a). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Comittee of the Regions an EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies Up to 2020, COM (2011) final. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/discrimination/docs/com_2011_173_en.pdf

Google Scholar Crossref

European Commission. (2011b). Added Value of Research, Innovation and Science portolio. (MEMO/11/520 19/07/2011). Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-11-520_en.htm

Google Scholar Crossref

European Commission. Directorate-General for Research. (2005). Carta europea del investigador. Código de conducta para la contratación de investigadores. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg.

Google Scholar Crossref

European Parliament. (2006). Roma women in the EU. European Parliament resolution on the situation of Roma women in the European Union (2005/2164 (INI)).

Google Scholar Crossref

European Roma Rights Center. (2004). Shadow Report of the European Roma Rights Center on the Kingdom of Spain's Fifth Periodic Report to the Commitee on Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW 31st Session 6 to 23 July 2004). Budapest: European Roma Rights Center.

Google Scholar Crossref

Fernández Enguita, M. (1999). Alumnos gitanos en la escuela paya: Un estudio sobre las relaciones étnicas en el sistema educativo. Madrid: Ariel Practicum.

Google Scholar Crossref

Flecha, R., & Gómez, J. (1995). Racismo: no, gracias. Ni moderno, ni postmoderno. Barcelona: El Roure.

Google Scholar Crossref

Flecha, R., & Gómez, J. (2004). Participatory Paradigms: Researching ‘with’ rather than ‘on’. In B. Crossan, J. Gallacher, & M. Osborne, Researching Widening Access: Issues and approaches in an international context (pp. 129-140). London, UK: Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogía del oprimido. Madrid: Siglo XXI.

Google Scholar Crossref

Fundación Secretariado General Gitano. (2010). Evaluación de la normalización educativa de las alumnas y los alumnos gitanos en la etapa de Educación Primaria. Madrid: Instituto de la Mujer.

Google Scholar Crossref

Giménez, A. (2000-2003). The education of gypsy childhood in Europe. FP5: European Commission RTD.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gómez, A., Racionero, S., & Sordé, T. (2010). Ten years of critical communicative methodology. International Review of Qualitative Research, 3(1), 17-43.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gómez, J., & Vargas, J. (2003). Why Romà Do Not Like Mainstream Schools: Voices of a People without Territory. Harvard Educational Review, 73(4), 559-590.

Google Scholar Crossref

Habermas, J. (1987). Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Vol. I y II. Madrid: Taurus (v.o. 1981).

Google Scholar Crossref

Hancock, I. (1988). Reunification and the role of of international romani union. Roma, 29, 9-19.

Google Scholar Crossref

Laparra, M. (. (2011). Diagnóstico social de la comunidad gitana en España. Un análisis contrastado de la Encuesta del CIS a Hogares de Población Gitana 2007. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad, Política Social e Igualdad, Secretaría General Técnica, Centro de Publicaciones.

Google Scholar Crossref

Macías, F., & Redondo, G. (2012). Pueblo gitano, género y educación: investigar para excluir o investigar para transformar. RISE-International Journal of Sociology of Education, 1(1), 71-92.

Google Scholar Crossref

Munté, A., Serradell, O., & Sordé, T. (2011). From Research to Policy: Roma Participation Through Communicative Organization. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(3), 256-266. doi:10.1177/1077800410397804

Google Scholar Crossref

Okely, J. (1997). The Traveller-Gypsies (Vol. 4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Phenjalipe. (2014). Strategy on the Advancement of Romani Women and Girls.

Google Scholar Crossref

Puigvert, L. (2001). Las otras mujeres. Barcelona: El Roure.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ringold, D., Orenstein, M. A., & Wilkens, E. (2005). Roma in an Expanding Europe. Breaking the Poverty Cycle. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

Google Scholar Crossref

Rose, R. (1983). Sinti and Roma in Germany. Roma, 7(2), 21-24.

Google Scholar Crossref

San Román, T. (2001). Evolución de los roles de género en la comunidad gitana. Universidad Internacional Menéndez Pelayo. Valencia.

Google Scholar Crossref

Sordé, T. (2006). Les reivindicacions educatives de la dona gitana. Cabrera de Mar: Galerada.

Google Scholar Crossref

Touraine, A., Wieviorka, M., & Flecha, R. (2004). Conocimiento e identidad. Voces de grupos culturales en la investigación social. Barcelona: El Roure.

Google Scholar Crossref

UNDP. (2002). Avoiding the Dependency Trap. The Roma in Central and Eastern Europe. A Regional Human Development Report. Bratislava: UNDP Regional Bureau for Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States.

Google Scholar Crossref

Published

2015-10-25

Almetric

Dimensions

How to Cite

Garcia, T. (2015). Contribuciones de la mujer gitana a la ciencia, a las políticas y a la mejora social. Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.17583/generos.2015.1721

Issue

Section

Articles