HANDSHAKING IN THE SECULAR: UNDERSTANDING AGENCY OF VEILED TURKISH-DUTCH MUSLIM STUDENTS

Authors

  • Deniz Batum Radboud University Institute for Gender Studies

https://doi.org/10.17583/generos.2016.1679

Keywords:


Downloads

Abstract

The article discusses agency of second generation veiled Turkish-Dutch Muslim students by looking at the issue of handshake. Utilising the Bourdesian conceptual tool of habitus and its accompanying concepts, we present the ways in which handshaking works for our respondents. Subsequently, we show how both not-handshaking and handshaking can lead to strategic gains. While not-handshaking becomes a positive and valued feature of their cultural capital in interactions with pious Muslim men, following the handshaking norm in Dutch social interaction is widely practiced to gain benefits. Given how they act in adaptive ways, we show how women’s agency can be defined and accounted for in two ways; both through the paradigm of ‘doing religion’ (Avishai, 2008), as well as through the paradigm of agency as defined by liberal feminism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Deniz Batum, Radboud University Institute for Gender Studies

PhD Candidate at the Institute for Gender Studies at the Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

References

Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Asad, T. (2009). Free speech, blasphemy and secular criticism. In T. Asad, W. Brown, J. Butler, & S. Mahmood (Eds.), Is Critique Secular? Blasphemy, injury and free speech (pp. 20–63). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Avishai, O. (2008). “Doing Religion” In a Secular World: Women in Conservative Religions and the Question of Agency. Gender & Society, 22(4), 409–433. doi:10.1177/0891243208321019

Google Scholar Crossref

Batum, D., & Jansen, W. (2013). Migrant Living Spaces: Religiosity and Gender in a Disciplinary Institution. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 34(4), 321–339. doi:10.1080/07256868.2013.807226

Google Scholar Crossref

Benn, T., & Dagkas, S. (2006). Incompatible? Compulsory mixed-sex Physical Education Initial Teacher Training (PEITT) and the inclusion of Muslim women: a case-study on seeking solutions. European Physical Education Review, 12(2), 181–200. doi:10.1177/1356336X06065181

Google Scholar Crossref

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bourdieu, P. (1992). The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian Meditations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bourdieu, P. (2004). In other words: essays towards a reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bourdieu, P. (2008). The forms of capital. In N. W. Biggart (Ed.), Readings in Economic Sociology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bracke, S. (2008). Conjugating the Modern/ Religious, Conceptualizing Female Religious Agency: Contours of a `Post-secular’ Conjuncture. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(6), 51–67. doi:10.1177/0263276408095544

Google Scholar Crossref

Bracke, S. (2011). Subjects of Debate: Secular and Sexual Exceptionalism, and Muslim Women in the Netherlands. Feminist Review 98 (1), 28–46.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bracke, S., & Fadil, N. (2012). “Is the headscarf oppressive or emancipatory?” Field notes

Google Scholar Crossref

Downloads

Published

2016-06-25

Almetric

Dimensions

How to Cite

Batum, D. (2016). HANDSHAKING IN THE SECULAR: UNDERSTANDING AGENCY OF VEILED TURKISH-DUTCH MUSLIM STUDENTS. Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies, 5(2), 962–985. https://doi.org/10.17583/generos.2016.1679

Issue

Section

Articles