The H2 Visa process in the catfish industry
https://doi.org/10.17583/generos.2015.1662
Downloads
Abstract
This article builds on global ethnography, transnational feminist sociology, and gendered organizations to examine the processes and practices required to obtain H2 visas, temporary work permits for non-U.S. citizens seeking employment in agriculture and non-agricultural sectors. The article is based on ethnographic observation at a U.S. Consulate in Mexico with a focus on observing the process experienced by a group of Mexican workers seeking H2-A Visas to work on a catfish farm in Mississippi. I argue that by more carefully examining the roles and perspectives of the catfish farm manager and a U.S. Consulate Director in the process of obtaining the H2-A visas, we can move beyond “globalization from above” or “globalization from below” perspectives to a more nuanced understanding of what transnationalism looks like from the middle. In addition, by applying a gendered organizations framework to understanding the H2 visa process at an interactional level, I demonstrate how the definition of the “good worker” is gendered.
Downloads
References
Avery, Jimmy, Terry Hanson, and Jim Steeby. 2013. U.S. farm-raised catfish industry:
Google Scholar CrossrefProduction, processing, and import trends 2013. Paper presented at the World Aquaculture Society Meetings.
Google Scholar Crossrefhttps://www.was.org/documents/MeetingPresentations/AQ2013/AQ2013_0803.pdf Accessed 1 August 2013.
Google Scholar CrossrefBartolomei, Maria Rita. 2010. Migrant male domestic workers in comparative perspective: Four case studies from Italy, India, Ivory Coast, and Congo. Men and Masculinities 13(1):87-110.
Google Scholar CrossrefBeasley, Christine. 2008. Rethinking hegemonic masculinity in a globalizing world. Men and Masculinities 11(1): 86-103.
Google Scholar CrossrefBritton, Dana M. 2000. The epistemology of the gendered organization. Gender & Society 14(3): 418-434.
Google Scholar Crossref------- and Laura Logan. 2008. Gendered organizations: Progress and prospects. Sociology Compass 2(1): 107-121.
Google Scholar CrossrefCasanova, Vanessa and Josh McDaniel. 2005. ‘No Sobra Y No Falta’: Recruitment networks and guest workers in southeastern U.S. forest industries. Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development: Environmental Change and Industry in the U.S. South 34(1): 45-84.
Google Scholar CrossrefCimini, Michael H. 1991. Delta pride pact. Monthly Labor Review 114(2): 40-41.
Google Scholar CrossrefCobb, James C. 1992. The most southern place on earth: The Mississippi Delta and the roots of regional identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefConnell, R.W. 1998. Masculinities and globalization. Men and Masculinities 1(1): 3-23.
Google Scholar Crossref------- and Julian Wood. 2005. Globalization and business masculinities. Men and Masculinities 7(4): 347-364.
Google Scholar CrossrefFarmworker Justice Report. 2011. No way to treat a guest: Why the H-2A Agricultural Visa Program fails U.S. and foreign workers. http://www.farmworkerjustice.org/sites/default/files/documents/7.2.a.6%20fwj.pdf. Accessed 1 August 2013.
Google Scholar CrossrefGarcia-Lopez, Gladys. 2008. ‘Nunca Te Toman En Cuenta [They never take you into account]’: The challenges of inclusion and strategies for success of Chicana attorneys. Gender & Society 22(5): 590-612.
Google Scholar CrossrefHanson, Terry and Dave Sites. 2006. 2005 U.S. Catfish Database. Sources: USDA National
Google Scholar CrossrefAgricultural Statistics Service and Mississippi Agricultural Statistics Service.
Google Scholar Crossrefhttp://msucares.com/aquaculture/catfish/database_05.pdf . Accessed 1 August 2013.
Google Scholar CrossrefHondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette. 2001. Domestica: Immigrant workers cleaning and caring in the shadows of affluence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar Crossref-------.1995. Beyond ‘The longer they stay’ (and say they will stay): Women and Mexican immigrant settlement. Qualitative Sociology 18(1):21-43.
Google Scholar CrossrefHossfeld, Karen J. 1990. ‘Their logic against them’: Contradictions in sex, race, and class in Silicon Valley. In Women workers and global restructuring, ed. Kathryn Ward, 149-78. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefHousing Assistance Council. 2012. Rural research note: Poverty in rural America (http://www.ruralhome.org/storage/research_notes/rrn_poverty.pdf, p. 3). Accessed 6 June 2014.
Google Scholar CrossrefKilborn, Peter T. Charges of exploitation roil a catfish plant,” New York Times, 10 December 1990.
Google Scholar CrossrefKim-Puri, H.J. 2005. Conceptualizing gender-sexuality-state-nation: An introduction. Gender & Society 19(2): 137-159.
Google Scholar CrossrefLee, Ching Kwan. 1998. Gender and the south China miracle: Two worlds of factory women. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefLevitt, Peggy. 2001a. The transnational villagers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar Crossref-------. 2001b. Transnational migration: Taking stock and future directions. Global Networks 1(3): 195-216.
Google Scholar CrossrefMcDaniel, Josh and Vanessa Casanova. 2003. Pines in lines: Tree planting, H2 B guest Workers, and rural poverty in Alabama. Southern Rural Sociology 19(1): 73-96.
Google Scholar CrossrefMuñoz, Carolina Bank. 2008. Transnational tortillas: Race, gender, and shopfloor politics in Mexico and the United States. New York: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2011. NOAA Fisheries:http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/aquaculture/homepage_stories/09_13_12_top_seafood_consumed.html Accessed 23 July 2013.
Google Scholar CrossrefOdem, Mary E. and Elaine Lacy (eds). 2009. Latino immigrants and the transformation of the U.S. south. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefParrenas, Rhacel Salazar. 2000. Migrant Filipina domestic workers and the international division of reproductive labor. Gender & Society 14 (4): 560-81.
Google Scholar CrossrefPatil, Vrushali. 2011. Transnational feminism in sociology: Articulations, agendas, and debates. Sociology Compass 5(7): 540-550.
Google Scholar CrossrefPeacock, James, Harry Watson, and Carrie Matthews. 2005. The American south in a global world. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefPortes, Alejandro, Luis E. Guarnizo and Patricia Landolt. 1999. The study of transnationalism: Pitfalls and promise of an emergent research field. Ethnic and Racial Studies 22(2): 217-237.
Google Scholar CrossrefPoster, Winifred. 2002. Racialism, sexuality, and masculinity: Gendering “global ethnography” of the workplace. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State, and Society 9(1):126-138.
Google Scholar CrossrefPurkayastha, Bandana. 2012. Intersectionality in a transnational world. Gender & Society 26:55-66.
Google Scholar CrossrefPyle, Jean L. 2006. Globalization, transnational migration, and gendered care work: Introduction. Globalizations 3(3): 283-295.
Google Scholar CrossrefRamirez, Hernan. 2011. Masculinity in the workplace: The case of Mexican immigrant gardeners. Men and Masculinities 14(1):97-116.
Google Scholar CrossrefSalzinger, Leslie. 1997. Genders in production: Making workers in Mexico’s global factories. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefSchweid, Richard. 1992. Catfish and the Delta: Confederate fish farming in the Mississippi
Google Scholar CrossrefDelta. Berkeley: Ten Speed Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefSmith-Nonini, Sandy. 2009. H2A guest workers and the state in North Carolina: From transnational production to transnational organizing. In Global connections and local receptions: New Latino immigration to the southeastern United States, ed. Jon Shefner and Fran Ansley, 249-278. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Google Scholar Crossref------. 2005. Federally-sponsored Mexican migrants in the transnational South. In The American South in a global world, ed. James L. Peacock, Harry L. Watson, and Carrie R. Matthews, 59-82. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefTilly, Charles. 1984. Big structures, large processes, huge comparisons. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Google Scholar CrossrefU.S. Census Bureau. 2014. State and county quick facts. (http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/28000.html). Accessed 6 July 2014.
Google Scholar CrossrefU.S. Department of Labor. 2010. Fact Sheet #26: Section H-2A of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). U.S. Wages and Hour Division. http://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/whdfs26.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2014.
Google Scholar CrossrefWaldinger, Roger and David Fitzgerald. 2004. Transnationalism in question. American Journal of Sociology 109(5): 1177-95.
Google Scholar CrossrefWilliams, Christine L., Chandra Muller, and Kristine Kilanski. 2012. Gendered organizations in the new economy. Gender & Society 26(4): 549-573.
Google Scholar CrossrefWilson, Jill H. 2013. Immigration facts: Temporary foreign workers. Brookings. http://www.brookings.edu/research/reports/2013/06/18-temporary-workers-wilson. Accessed 6 June 2014.
Google Scholar CrossrefYelvington, Kevin A. 1995. Producing power: Ethnicity, gender, and class in a Caribbean workplace. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefZuniga, Victor and Ruben Hernandez-Leon. 2005. New destinations: Mexican immigration in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.